LYON Mountain, LYON Hill or LYON Valley ?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

LYON Mountain, LYON Hill or LYON Valley ?

Post: # 483384Post Enrico_Misso »

This graph basically tries to encapsulate the history of the StKFC.

The purple line shows the Match % each year.
The match % = (Wins + Draws/2) / Games in season
So if you win 10 and draw 1 in a 20 game season your Match % = 10.5/20 = 52.5%.

The Blue line is the cumulative version of the purple line ie our all time record to that point

The Black line is a trend line (line of best fit using linear regression) to illustrate the long term trend.
It is somewhat misleading as it's steep upward gradient is more due to the influence of our dismal first 15 years

Image
Conclusions
A bleak start to our VFL career saw us sitting on 0% until our 4th year
It took till 1905 before our cumulative Match % reached 10%.
By 1908 we reached 20% before dipping back to 18%
It took till 1929 to pass the 30% barrier
We hit our all time high of 38.46% in 1976 in the last year of Allan Jeans' reign.
After the "lost decade" of the 80s we dropped back to below 36% in 89.
Under Sheldon, Alves and Thomas we have steadily recovered ground.

How far are we from our all time high ?
Very close.
We closed 2007 at 38.23%, and if we were to win our next 8 games (or have 8 more wins than losses in 2008) then we will pass that 1976 high water mark.

When will we hit the 40% barrier ?
To achieve that we would need to win about 63 more games (or accrue 63 more wins than losses) so that would require quite a few years of consistent success.

Selective viewings of history ?
Pre and post Jeans

If you define StK in terms of the influence of Allan Jeans then
- our record before Jeans commenced coaching in 61 was 32.3%
- and 44.4% since he took over in 61
His influence can never be understated.

The "Modern" era
If you define the modern era as commencing with Kenny's manifesto in 1990, then
- our record since Sheldon took over is an impressive 47.7% (and that includes Watson/Blight)

The Four Decades of Shame
In many ways we are still recovering from our dismal dark days prior to 1910, the 40s, the 50s and the 80s
- excluding those 4 decades of shame our overall rate is 47.4% (covering 68 years)
- or conversely those 4 decades of shame produced a rate of only 23.0% (covering 43 years)
It is no surprise that we won 20 of our 26 wooden spoons in those periods
And of the other 6 spoons, the one in 1910 and the two in the late 70s would roll into the decades of shame if I was slightly more flexible in defining those dark periods.
(For completeness sake the other 3 spoons consisted of two in the 20's and the Watson spoon in 2000).
Or Three eras of Shame
In fact if I add 5 more years (1910-11, 1977-9) into our three eras of shame to become 1897-1911, 1940-1959, and 1977-1989
Then our Match rate in the 63 years not covered by these periods is a very respectable 49.6%

Could we reach 50% in our lifetime ?
Not unless you are into cryogenics.
If you define a goodish average season as say 14 wins and 10 losses.
Then it would require 109 consecutive goodish average seasons before we reached 50%, so bookmark 2116.

Basically it will take many many many more respectable decades to obliterate the impact of those three unsuccessful eras.


The stand-out feature of the graph is the impact of Allan Jeans
His reign from 1961 to 1976 is obvious from the purple graph.
His impact is also obvious in the form of a distinct lump in the cumulative curve.
I have called this phenomena "The Allan Jeans Mountain".

The impact of other coaches can also be seen.
Sheldon, Alves and Thomas were also consistently above average.
And the impacts of coaches Watson and Gellie is obvious to see, I have named valleys after them !
From earlier eras George Sparrow and Ansell Clarke had spikes, whilst Allan Hird and Les Foote had dips.
Indeed prior to Allan Jeans we only had 4 coaches who coached for more than two consecutive years (Minogue, Clarke, Froude and Killigrew) and they each managed only 3 years.
ie before Jeans no-one coached us for more than 3 consecutive years.
So the StK coaching position was pretty much a revolving door prior to Jeans, making it hard to name spikes or dips after individual coaches.
Note that prior to McNamara in 1913 we did not have a coach, just a captain as per the custom of that era.

Questions
Can we surpass our all time peak next season ?
When can we reach the 40% threshold ?

Will Lyon be a Mountain, a Hill or a Valley ?


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
n1ck
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9870
Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
Location: Clarinda
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Post: # 483391Post n1ck »

Are you Russel Holmesby, Bruce Eva, or just an accountant?


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Post: # 483394Post bergholt »

Magnificent post, thanks mate.

The graph seems to suggest that both Alves and Thomas were unlucky to be dumped, seeing as they never really had dips. Lyon starts above average - will he be able to keep it up there?


User avatar
Oh When the Saints
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5621
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006 4:25pm
Location: QLD
Contact:

Post: # 483395Post Oh When the Saints »

Actually, they have added an appendage to the name of the world's highest mountain, in anticipation of the success of the Lyon era at St Kilda.


From now on, it will be known as Mt. Lyon-Everest


They should only play AFL games now when it's raining. Slow games of footy are so much better to watch.
User avatar
saint patrick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4338
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
Location: mt.martha

Post: # 483406Post saint patrick »

Geez looking at that graph the 80,s were as grim as I remember... :roll:

No wonder I have a nervous condition when it comes to watching games...

A legacy of a decades of torture :shock:


Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....

'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05

"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
El Wood
Club Player
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 11:29am
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 483419Post El Wood »

Very interesting chart. One thing though, can you re-do the chart with the Y-axis up to 100%. It is slightly misleading keeping it to 80% - it makes it look higher than it really is. (Also, you don't need the two decimal points on the Y-axis figures).


User avatar
my les foote
Club Player
Posts: 1024
Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
Location: Beside the seaside
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 483425Post my les foote »

From earlier eras George Sparrow and Ansell Clarke had spikes, whilst Allan Hird and Les Foote had dips.
I named myself after Les Foote because I heard he "had a dip". Maybe I misinterpreted?


Win it for HIM!
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5764
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 586 times
Been thanked: 436 times
Contact:

Post: # 483451Post samoht »

Before adulating and crediting Alan Jeans for our golden era and how much influence he had , what I'd like to know is ..
- was it a quirk of history, our recruiting or the favourable zoning that provided us the wealth of player talent in the 60's and 70's..

Those players would have succeeded under any coach.


User avatar
Beej
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6864
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 3:57pm
Location: Carlton Norf

Post: # 483595Post Beej »

samoht wrote:Before adulating and crediting Alan Jeans for our golden era and how much influence he had , what I'd like to know is ..
- was it a quirk of history, our recruiting or the favourable zoning that provided us the wealth of player talent in the 60's and 70's..

Those players would have succeeded under any coach.
I'm sure it was a combination of good recruiting and Jeans' ability to unify a group of footballers and bring the best out of them.

We were the dominant team around then and should've won a lot more than the one flag.

The coach is the most important person at any club imo.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Post: # 483601Post saintsRrising »

I was thinking more the Lyon Plateau....where we reach the top and stay there fora while :wink:


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
spidoir
Club Player
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007 6:11pm
Location: Perth

Post: # 483610Post spidoir »

could it be that the extra volatility seen post 1990 could be in part due to the introduction of the salary cap, draft etc... effectively showing that football goes in cycles, making the comp fairer as compared to prior decades where the powerful clubs were able to dominate???

such, the peaks and troughs of Alves, Thomas & Co not solely because of their coaching ability but also due to these innovations in footy.

a coaching performance would be judged more on the ability to stay at the top, reduce volatility of year to year results - signifying something that nullifies cyclical effect of draft etc. Going by that it would suggest we have never really had an outstanding coach, or that their influence was limited


"The line 'I'm a mad St Kilda supporter' is one of life's great tautologies, because sanity has never been a requisite to follow the fortunes of the red, white and black"
User avatar
Persuader
Club Player
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed 30 Mar 2005 3:23pm
Location: wherever the AFL doesn't want me

Post: # 483614Post Persuader »

That is a very impressive piece of work...or should I say, work avoidance.
Also reminds me of the living hell that was the early 80's.
Please God we're heading for the Lyon Peaks of Heaven.


Founding member of the Jason Blake Appreciation Society
User avatar
Dan Warna
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12846
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:56am
Location: melbourne

Post: # 483616Post Dan Warna »

the graph has disappeared for me, but its a good read.

the graphs back.

its a great read, nice piece of research and analysis.

as for teh comment 'anyone can coach', well thats bollux IMO.

you have the ingredients in teh players, its up to the coach to extract it from them.

IMO guys like lethal and once pagan, and once sheedy regularly took 'ordinary talents' and slotted them into champion teams.


Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime

SHUT UP KRIME!
spidoir
Club Player
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007 6:11pm
Location: Perth

Post: # 483635Post spidoir »

and that would be why those teams spent more than a year or two at the peak (because they are doing more with what they've got), or their 'dips' would not go as low.

your opinion is not inconsistent with what was proposed, in fact it supports it.


"The line 'I'm a mad St Kilda supporter' is one of life's great tautologies, because sanity has never been a requisite to follow the fortunes of the red, white and black"
fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 483656Post fingers »

Dude - love the effort - but get yourself an Xbox or something....even online porn would be a break.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Post: # 483745Post Enrico_Misso »

fingers wrote:Dude - love the effort - but get yourself an Xbox or something....even online porn would be a break.
Thanks for the advice - they don't call you "Fingers" for nothing. :lol:


I have always been troubled by our low historical win rate which is why I have monitored it over time.
It is something of an embarassment that we have won less than 40% of our games in total.
And I sort of feel that passing that barrier gives us credibility.


Even worse is our record against the three horror clubs.

Against Essendon our Match % is just 31.3% and has only recently hit 30%.

Against Collingwood it languishes at 26.6%

And against Carlton it is a pathetic 22.3%.
And that is after winning our last 9 games against them.
Before that it was just 18.65% :shock: :shock:

These are embarassing numbers.
The modern (post 1990) era with it's Match rate of almost 48% has been a source of satisfaction to all of us who endured the deep dark days of the 80s, as we watch ourselves gradually haul our way back to respectability.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Post: # 483767Post Enrico_Misso »

samoht wrote:Before adulating and crediting Alan Jeans for our golden era and how much influence he had , what I'd like to know is ..
- was it a quirk of history, our recruiting or the favourable zoning that provided us the wealth of player talent in the 60's and 70's..

Those players would have succeeded under any coach.
I think there are two components to being a successful coach.
Firstly you need to have the cattle.
And there is no doubt Jeans was lucky to have such a talented bunch of players emerging in 63.
And then he rebuilt another talented team in 71.
And at Hawthorn he picked up an even more talented group in 81 which he kept topping up through till 1990.

But it is one thing being "lucky" to inherit a talented list.
It is quite another thing to get them to perform.

Jeansy averaged over 58% with us.
And incredibly over 72% with Hawthorn.

All up he coached 575 games at a 62.3% success rate.
That is phenomenal.
And proves he is the best of the best.

There have been plenty of other "talented" teams over the years.
But it takes a talented coach to bring them together.

And that 62.3% includes the 22 games he coached at Richmond for just 5 wins in 92. (A worse record than even KB).

I met Allan Jeans once and I asked him why he coached Richmond.
His answer was "for the money".
Whilst that was an honest answer I found it sad that despite his successes at StK and Hawthorn he obviously never got the sort of money that someone of his talent would command today.
Bit of an indictment on both clubs. :oops:


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11227
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 483815Post Bernard Shakey »

And he was a copper.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 483854Post fingers »

Enrico_Misso wrote:
fingers wrote:Dude - love the effort - but get yourself an Xbox or something....even online porn would be a break.
Thanks for the advice - they don't call you "Fingers" for nothing. :lol:


I have always been troubled by our low historical win rate which is why I have monitored it over time.
It is something of an embarassment that we have won less than 40% of our games in total.
And I sort of feel that passing that barrier gives us credibility.


Even worse is our record against the three horror clubs.

Against Essendon our Match % is just 31.3% and has only recently hit 30%.

Against Collingwood it languishes at 26.6%

And against Carlton it is a pathetic 22.3%.
And that is after winning our last 9 games against them.
Before that it was just 18.65% :shock: :shock:

These are embarassing numbers.
The modern (post 1990) era with it's Match rate of almost 48% has been a source of satisfaction to all of us who endured the deep dark days of the 80s, as we watch ourselves gradually haul our way back to respectability.
LOL. In all seriousness it's an interesting piece of analysis. The carlton figures REALLY sh!t me. It would be interesting to compare the overall rate to other clubs.


Post Reply