gwilt

[saintjake]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad
where did he plaY?

x

[plugger66]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad
where did he plaY?

x

Back and forward. Very good game.

[Saints Premiers 2008]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad
where did he plaY?

x

Back and forward. Very good game.

i thought he was the link in the chain in scoring opportunties personally...a role that anyone could do...but then again he was there and obviously continued to be

good good

[matrix]

gwilty reminds me of blake for some reason.
gwilt is good.....i like his kicking

[Saints Premiers 2008]

gwilty reminds me of blake for some reason.
gwilt is good.....i like his kicking

blake's kicking is the last thing that is a positive about him...

[matrix]

i just meant general play...the little things.

[Eastern]

It was Jimmy's best game for the club today. Lets hope he backs it up next week !!

[carnasaints55]

i think he played well, but he definitely wasnt amazing. still lacks a bit of awarness and speed. got caught a few times. definitely not denying he played well though.

[BigMart]

He played a very good game........utilised his strengths......getting free and kicking....

[Enrico_Misso]

It was Jimmy's best game for the club today. Lets hope he backs it up next week !!

I assume you are excluding finals from this assessment ?

[casey scorp]

Gwilt has one of the best long accurate kicks in our team (but none are better than Goddard), but so often his decision making when it's in close and quick (and sometimes when he's got space but takes too long to decide what to do) let him down.

Definitely worth persevering with.

Best game was against Adelaide - Q/Final 2005.

[Saint Bev]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad



where did he plaY?

x

Etihad Stadium

[Beej]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad
where did he plaY?

x

back and forward.

xoxox

[skeptic]

i didnt see the game today
but 27 touches isnt bad



where did he plaY?

x

Etihad Stadium

BAM

[Verdun66]

I thought he was very good. Noticed him in the clinches. He is a strong boy, lots of physical presence. And as mentioned he kicks long. Good news.

[Cairnsman]

Fantastic to read this thread.

Does this mean that Gwilt has finally convinced us that he is in the clubs best 22. I liked hearing that people think he is strong with a great accurate long range kick. It sounds like he does great things for our team structure.

[plugger66]

Fantastic to read this thread.

Does this mean that Gwilt has finally convinced us that he is in the clubs best 22. I liked hearing that people think he is strong with a great accurate long range kick. It sounds like he does great things for our team structure.

No it doesnt to me. It proves he has ability but still has a long way to go. We one by 100. I reckon you may have looked ok out there yesterday. Sounds like I am having a whinge but we need to realise that there will be much tougher games than yesterday and if Jimmy, Geary and one or two others stand up then well they may have made it.

[Rickabee]

He played well. He is improving and he needs to continue to improve.

He gave off a bad handpass that gifted a goal to the weagles but his kicks have depth and can deliver the ball well into the forward line.

He remains a work in progress but he certainly deserves to be acknowleded for his improvement.

[To the top]

I thought he played well after going back (to replace Raph Clarke) against Sydney.

Hard to tell against Adelaide (TV) but I did note his big body caused concerns to Adelaide - you just got glimpses of his positioning.

Yesterday I thought he again caused problems for WCE because of his body, his quick gives in hot contests where he gets the ball or inhibits because of his direct route to the ball aided by his body dimensions (he does not flirt around the side looking for the pill, he puts himself in the direct line and says "go around me if you can") - and, of course, the depth of his kicking.