Interesting idea, but ultimately flawed. How flawed depends on how adaptable their definition of the best 22 is and how often it's changed throughout the season.
Round one Sydney vs. St Kilda
We were 91% at full strength, vs. Sydney's 96%
Apparently Jesse Smith, Andrew Lovett (well he's a whole different argument in himself) and Adam Pattison belong in our best 22, Armitage and Peake don't, and Sam Fisher should start either in the forward pocket, ruck, ruck rover or on the bench.
Has anyone seen the HS's full strength indicator?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
CeilidhSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mon 18 Sep 2006 11:00pm
- Location: The Ironically Named Victory Room
-
aussiejones
- Club Player
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Wed 07 Apr 2004 8:42pm
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10685
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Lovett is gone forever, but you have no hope of getting rid of Plugger66, he is here for keeps.CeilidhSaint wrote:I haven't seen it but it sounds like a w@nk.
Including Lovett is like including Plugger. He is no longer to all intents and purposes on our list.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10685
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Best 30 is what qualifies you for the finals.aussiejones wrote:What a crock ...........best 22perhaps best 30 would be fairer
But if you are forced to play your best 30 on the last Saturday in September, you lose.
8 injured players, when you desperately need your best 22.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
!!
