if fish face is anything......he's predictable...

stinger · Post: # 979020Post **stinger** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:02pm

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/m ... 5911959763

whinging pr1ck...what about ling selwood and that dog chapman.....

GrumpyOne · Post: # 979024Post **GrumpyOne** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:09pm

Let the mind-games begin.....

bendigo bob · Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:13pm

Oh come on Stinger you know Geelong are way too good and too professional to have to resort to using any tactics like jumper punching, scragging, elbowing, striking etc or any other form of illegal contact. They only play purists football and only ever go for the ball not the man.

Yeah right!!!!!
Wake up AFL and smell the roses.

bigred · Post: # 979038Post **bigred** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:34pm

I really hope the club gives this all the attention it deserves.

Absolutely none.

FQF · Post: # 979048Post **FQF** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:44pm

I hope that Ross doesn't make any of these sort of statements and contribute to the "mind games."

Silence can be very loud.

bigcarl · Post: # 979055Post **bigcarl** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:54pm

What a sook. Let's hope whatever protection poor little Stevie J gets from roughhouse tactics also apply to Riewoldt, Milne, etc.

Comments like his can come back to bite you.

plugger66 · Post: # 979057Post **plugger66** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:55pm

Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.

bigcarl · Post: # 979060Post **bigcarl** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 5:57pm

plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.

How is Bomber getting on with the son of God?

markp · Post: # 979066Post **markp** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:04pm

When asked, all Ross has to say is that he has complete faith in the professionalism and judgement of the umpires, and that all he expects is consistency across the board.

bigcarl · Post: # 979069Post **bigcarl** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:05pm

markp wrote:When asked, all Ross has to say is that he has complete faith in the professionalism and judgement of the umpires, and that all he expects is consistency across the board.

Correct response, though we all know that is wishful thinking and Baker is a marked man.

jays · Post: # 979070Post **jays** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:06pm

what a sook

plugger66 · Post: # 979072Post **plugger66** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:08pm

bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.
How is Bomber getting on with the son of God?

Probably the same he always has but after 2 flags I am pretty sure most of their supporters dont give a stuff. Why do you want to know in this thread?

bigcarl · Post: # 979076Post **bigcarl** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:15pm

plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.
How is Bomber getting on with the son of God?
Probably the same he always has but after 2 flags I am pretty sure most of their supporters dont give a stuff. Why do you want to know in this thread?

I heard there are some serious issues there.

Thinline · Post: # 979078Post **Thinline** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:20pm

As long as they keep a close eye on SJ's elbows as well, I don't give a f*** what the umps do.

True Blue Sainter · Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:27pm

plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.

Didn't advantage Brett Ratten and his mob too much on the weekend.

plugger66 · Post: # 979081Post **plugger66** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:27pm

bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt expect anything different. If RL can think of some advantage he will use it as well and so he should.
How is Bomber getting on with the son of God?
Probably the same he always has but after 2 flags I am pretty sure most of their supporters dont give a stuff. Why do you want to know in this thread?

I heard there are some serious issues there.

I hope we have serious issues with Rooy after we win 2 flags in the next 3 years.

bigcarl · Post: # 979083Post **bigcarl** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 6:33pm

Thinline wrote:As long as they keep a close eye on SJ's elbows as well, I don't give a f*** what the umps do.

Oh yeah, they'll look after Bakes.

Gimme a break.

Mr Magic · Post: # 979111Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 7:31pm

I heard, from a reliable source

, that Bakes has to front the Tribunal on Wednesday night to answer charges levelled at him by the AFL's Investigations Officer.

Charge 1.
Baker be called to answer for anything that might occur anywhere in the vicinity of the MCG during the time period of Midnight September 2 to Midnight September 3.

Charge 2.
Baker be called to account for any misbehaviour by any player from any team during Mad Monday.

Charge 3.
Baker be called to answer as to why he shouldn't be suspended for anything he might do to anybody in any future game.

The MRP has levied an indicative penalty as listed below:-

Charge 1 - 2 weeks
Charge 2 - 4 weeks
Charge 3 - 12 weeks

plus, given Baker's record, all penalties to be:-
added together
then multiplied by 2
then add an additional 4 games, just for the hell of it.

Furthermore, in a radical departure from their normal chooklotto deliberations, the MRP have determined that Baker can only serve his penalty against teams that are in the top 4 of the ladder, when the game is on Saturday afternoons.
Therefore it is expected that Baker will be eligible to play sometime in 2015.

stinger · Post: # 979112Post **stinger** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 7:31pm

bakes is just about to be resurrected after being crucified for a second time by the mrp...........lets hope it is third time lucky...or more correctly .....no third time...but i ain't holding my breath......

Cairnsman · Post: # 979115Post **Cairnsman** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 7:35pm

My wish is for Bakes to play this week in a Victory thus vindicating the selection by the Coaches. I then wish that Bakes plays in Saints premiership thus knocking the farking living shyte out of Steve J and of coarse if it is against the pies then smashing the living crap out of Dale Thomas and Didak...thus earning himself a premiership medal and a 45 week suspension.

SainterK · Post: # 979129Post **SainterK** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 7:58pm

I like it this, I really do....play tough Saints footy boys!

Eastern · Post: # 979181Post **Eastern** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 9:12pm

FQF wrote:I hope that Ross doesn't make any of these sort of statements and contribute to the "mind games."

Silence can be very loud.

Too Late.

Ross has already said that Johnson is "one of the most agressive forwards in the game" !!

joffaboy · Post: # 979183Post **joffaboy** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 9:14pm

I agree with Thompson - Baker is a dirty thug

matrix · Post: # 979195Post **matrix** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 9:31pm

Eastern · Post: # 979200Post **Eastern** » Mon 30 Aug 2010 9:38pm

joffaboy wrote:I agree with Thompson - Baker is a dirty thug

You could have saved this crap for your speech on Friday !!