and here's the clean-out at the hawks....

Stjohn · Post: # 1017503Post **Stjohn** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:11pm

Taylor, Dowler, Skipper, Muston, Tuck, Peterson, Moss, Kayler-Thomson, Stokes, Johnston, Hooper all axed. (source L_Holmesby)

Grrrrr · Post: # 1017506Post **Grrrrr** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:14pm

Tuck has been granted a rookie spot unless that has been recindered?

Peterson looks the goods but, for the same reason he was delisted from Richmond, has a s*** attitude.

StNoodles · Post: # 1017507Post **StNoodles** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:15pm

Dowler and Peterson would be worth a look.

Dowler had limited opportunities with Roughy and Buddy. High draft pick.

Peterson has a bit of speed and X factor.

SainterK · Post: # 1017513Post **SainterK** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:24pm

I read somewhere I think, that Peterson has perhaps been not turning up and stuff?

Dr Spaceman · Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:29pm

SainterK wrote:I read somewhere I think, that Peterson has perhaps been not turning up and stuff?

Read the same thing - real attitude problem.

If he still has that after receiving a second chance at the Hawks I'm not confident a move to a third club's going to change it.

IMO - steer clear!

GrumpyOne · Post: # 1017519Post **GrumpyOne** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:32pm

SainterK wrote:I read somewhere I think, that Peterson has perhaps been not turning up and stuff?

and stuffing what?

#1GILL · Post: # 1017539Post **#1GILL** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 3:58pm

SainterK wrote:I read somewhere I think, that Peterson has perhaps been not turning up and stuff?

Injunction

Moods · Post: # 1017547Post **Moods** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 4:15pm

StNoodles wrote:Dowler and Peterson would be worth a look.

Dowler had limited opportunities with Roughy and Buddy. High draft pick.

Peterson has a bit of speed and X factor.

Dowler's a dud. NO WAY. Hawk supporters I know cringed every time he got picked. He slower than Kosi, and smaller than him and can't kick or mark as as well as him. He's not as aggressive either.

And Kos is hanging on by his fingernails as far as I'm concerned.

Cairnsman · Post: # 1017549Post **Cairnsman** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 4:30pm

Let's get Petterson. We are mad if we don't try and pick him up.

sainterinsydney · Tue 19 Oct 2010 4:36pm

Could Peterson be worth a gamble at pick 70 or 90 odd? If we could get Peterson with a late draft pick, maybe it would be worth it?

#1GILL · Post: # 1017555Post **#1GILL** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 4:53pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Could Peterson be worth a gamble at pick 70 or 90 odd? If we could get Peterson with a late draft pick, maybe it would be worth it?

Potentially good player, but take a look at my post about him above.

gringo · Post: # 1017557Post **gringo** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 4:55pm

Gary Moss had a few good games too. I thought he might be a player. I heard it was peterson not so sure he wanted to continue footy.

zebraman · Post: # 1017577Post **zebraman** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 5:35pm

Wayde Skipper could be worth a look at...even allowing for the fact that it was his run down and tackle of Xavier Clarke at Williamstown last year that resulted in X Clarkes knee injury

plugger66 · Post: # 1017581Post **plugger66** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 5:45pm

zebraman wrote:Wayde Skipper could be worth a look at...even allowing for the fact that it was his run down and tackle of Xavier Clarke at Williamstown last year that resulted in X Clarkes knee injury

Yes really looks the goods. We should try to draft him.

Eastern · Post: # 1017586Post **Eastern** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 5:56pm

There are a couple of names on that list that might see them breathing a huge sigh of relief at that club !!

#1GILL · Post: # 1017588Post **#1GILL** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 6:02pm

plugger66 wrote:
zebraman wrote:Wayde Skipper could be worth a look at...even allowing for the fact that it was his run down and tackle of Xavier Clarke at Williamstown last year that resulted in X Clarkes knee injury
Yes really looks the goods. We should try to draft him.

Hahahahahahaha, I love your consistency in sarcasm. It's comittment.

saint66au · Post: # 1017590Post **saint66au** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 6:15pm

Thought Kayler-Thomson a bit stiff. Watched him a bit as I work with one of his relatives.

Promoted from rookie list at the start of the year due to the Hawks injuries and played Round 1. Played a few senior games but was in Box Hills best more often that not

The one thing every one of those players have in common is inconsistancy. Can remember almost all of them playing one blinder for the Hawks but remember hearing plenty of them for Box Hill too

Prefer others

SaintSimmo · Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:01pm

peterson, tuck and downer...wait dowler are all worth a look. interesting delistings there from the dorks.

InkerSaint · Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:06pm

saint66au wrote:Thought Kayler-Thomson a bit stiff. Watched him a bit as I work with one of his relatives.

Promoted from rookie list at the start of the year due to the Hawks injuries and played Round 1. Played a few senior games but was in Box Hills best more often that not

One soft-as-butter game against Essendon stamped his papers. Might be worth a look.

MCG-Unit · Post: # 1017619Post **MCG-Unit** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:14pm

gringo wrote:Gary Moss had a few good games too. I thought he might be a player.........

Yes Moss would be the one I would consider out of those Hawker delistings

plugger66 · Post: # 1017621Post **plugger66** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:19pm

Not one of these players are worth a look at unless you are female and they are good looking. We complain we have to many ordinary players already and we want rejects who either cant play or have poor attitudes.

Moccha · Post: # 1017623Post **Moccha** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:27pm

plugger66 wrote:Not one of these players are worth a look at unless you are female and they are good looking. We complain we have to many ordinary players already and we want rejects who either cant play or have poor attitudes.

What if you're gay.

That's a disciminatory comment!

MCG-Unit · Post: # 1017624Post **MCG-Unit** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:28pm

Yes Leigh Brown and Goldsack are ordinary players IMO, yet they just played in a winning GF side - depends how they're coached, and used on the field........

Michael Barlow was considered an ordinary player, overlooked in drafts

plugger66 · Post: # 1017625Post **plugger66** » Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:29pm

MCG-Unit wrote:Yes Leigh Brown and Goldsack are ordinary players IMO, yet they just played in a winning GF side - depends how they're coached, and used on the field........

Michael Barlow was considered an ordinary player, overlooked in drafts

Any of those delisted?

Dr Spaceman · Tue 19 Oct 2010 8:32pm

plugger66 wrote:Not one of these players are worth a look at unless you are female and they are good looking. We complain we have to many ordinary players already and we want rejects who either cant play or have poor attitudes.

Hamill & Gehrig were high class recruits.

King, Schneider, Dempster, Ray & Peake have either been very good or handy but were secured by trading draft picks.

Can people name one decent player we've picked up after they were delisted by another club?

I'm with p66 on this one.

No more rejects already! Let's back our established players+our developing players+kids we pick up in the 2010 draft.