Ricky on SEN Mon am

saintbrat · Post: # 1041963Post **saintbrat** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 7:13am

giving his side
herald sun claiming they are just following a story......... and claiming YES she is dangerous....

Spinner · Post: # 1041966Post **Spinner** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 7:27am

Seemed pretty confident in all that.

HS editor interview was quite balanced..

saintbrat · Post: # 1041971Post **saintbrat** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 7:42am

http://sen.com.au/audioplayer/Audio/Ricky-Nixon/1840

Grimfang · Post: # 1041977Post **Grimfang** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:08am

The girl is anything BUT vulnerable.

The little charmer named and threatened the girl at the centre of the Collingwood rape allegations via twitter overnight.

As it stands; she hasn't been held to account for anything she has done. No wonder she believes she can get away with it.

First step in helping her would be for the media to stop giving her attention, which they won't. All they are helping her do at the moment is learn how to spin a better story.

Who wants to bet her next "big story" will be about a certain newspaper journo who plied her with alcohol and had sex with her?

markp · Post: # 1041978Post **markp** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:09am

Just finished on 774 now... gotta say, I believe him.

The Hun are the biggest disgrace here.

Dr Spaceman · Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:11am

I think things are about to get a whole lot more interesting.

If, as many predict, Ricky Nixon is stripped of his accreditation he is unlikely to go quietly.

This girl has had it all her own way up to date, using all forms of social media to blacken the names of those she has an agenda against. To date the Saints have taken a very conservative approach to what has been going on, mainly to protect their players and sponsors and in general their brand. Apart from some court action, which many including myself believe was the correct course of action, thereâ€™s been very little action in the media from the club. It has worked a treat for the girl as she has garnered support from Hinch and the like and ended up with accommodation paid by the Saints.

However if Nixon falls he will effectively lose his income and his career; his reputation will be permanently tarnished as will his personal life. If that happens then watch out.

Those of us who have taken a keen interest in this matter know the girl has a lot of things going on. Some of it may be gossip but a lot of it comes straight from her own mouth via twitter and various blogs. The MSM has to date shielded the general public from all this with her dark side revealing itself only in cute references to her being â€œtroubledâ€

DWOODROW · Post: # 1041987Post **DWOODROW** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:24am

If St kilda had taken action a long time ago we wouldn,t be still tallking about this little piece of work

joffaboy · Post: # 1041991Post **joffaboy** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:28am

DWOODROW wrote:If St kilda had taken action a long time ago we wouldn,t be still tallking about this little piece of work

What crap.

They did take action, which resulted in an out of court agreement.

The media was on her side, and condemned the Saints for taking legal action.

What bloody action do you suggest other than what they took.

And how would have it stopped Nixon from getting involved? he has nothing to do with the Saints apart from managing a couple of players.

What "action" did you want to stop her talking? Taking out a contract with a hitman?

DWOODROW · Post: # 1041997Post **DWOODROW** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:42am

joffaboy wrote:
DWOODROW wrote:If St kilda had taken action a long time ago we wouldn,t be still tallking about this little piece of work
What crap.

They did take action, which resulted in an out of court agreement.

The media was on her side, and condemned the Saints for taking legal action.

What bloody action do you suggest other than what they took.

And how would have it stopped Nixon from getting involved? he has nothing to do with the Saints apart from managing a couple of players.

What "action" did you want to stop her talking? Taking out a contract with a hitman?

So you are telling me there was absolutely nothing to be done to shut this disgraceful little tripe up.
Your a wanka.
She is f****** with everyones lives and wants to be treated like a big girl. She gets into clubs by pretending to be a big girl.
Why not treat her like a big girl and take her to the f****** cleaners.
You are obviously happy that your beloved club has done f*** all to stop there players being named and shamed.
What a joke you are

Eastern · Post: # 1042006Post **Eastern** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:55am

Settle Guys !!

This is the ultimate "Dammed if you do-Dammed if you don't" situation for the club and our players who are/were directly and indirectly involved. Unfortunately, it will forever be linked to our club and I for one am relieved that I am not required to make these decisions either way for our club.

Let's just accept that this is a very emotive subject and that opinions are going to differ, but what the club and the players need right now is the support of our members & fans !!

Dr Spaceman · Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:56am

Eastern wrote:Settle Guys !!

This is the ultimate "Dammed if you do-Dammed if you don't" situation for the club and our players who are/were directly and indirectly involved. Unfortunately, it will forever be linked to our club and I for one am relieved that I am not required to make these decisions either way for our club.

Let's just accept that this is a very emotive subject and that opinions are going to differ, but what the club and the players need right now is the support of our members & fans !!

Well put Eastern.

DWOODROW · Post: # 1042009Post **DWOODROW** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 8:57am

Eastern wrote:Settle Guys !!

This is the ultimate "Dammed if you do-Dammed if you don't" situation for the club and our players who are/were directly and indirectly involved. Unfortunately, it will forever be linked to our club and I for one am relieved that I am not required to make these decisions either way for our club.

Let's just accept that this is a very emotive subject and that opinions are going to differ, but what the club and the players need right now is the support of our members & fans !!

And the club eastern.

Eastern · Post: # 1042010Post **Eastern** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:01am

DWOODROW wrote:
Eastern wrote:Settle Guys !!

This is the ultimate "Dammed if you do-Dammed if you don't" situation for the club and our players who are/were directly and indirectly involved. Unfortunately, it will forever be linked to our club and I for one am relieved that I am not required to make these decisions either way for our club.

Let's just accept that this is a very emotive subject and that opinions are going to differ, but what the club and the players need right now is the support of our members & fans !!
And the club eastern.

I'm looking from outside. You may know more than me !!

markp · Post: # 1042014Post **markp** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:10am

Are they serious??

The Hun is officially down there with the 'best' in the UK now....

Ricky Nixon should let the Herald Sun release the tapes

Anthony Dowsley From: Herald Sun February 21, 2011 9:00AM

NIXON'S HOTEL VISIT

LAST week the Herald Sun showed Ricky Nixon video and audio of him in hotel rooms.

If Nixon has nothing to hide -- and he has denied he had sex with the "St Kilda Schoolgirlâ€™â€™-- he should consent for the Herald Sun to release the audio and video tapes it has obtained.

The AFL player manager is fighting for his career and the AFLPA will make a decision on whether he is fit to keep his accreditation.

He has just told Triple M, "where is the proofâ€™?â€™â€™. Releasing the tapes is the obvious answer.

He has described the girl at the centre of this scandal as vulnerable, so why would his car be outside the hotel all night?

How was the author of this article able to film him leaving the hotel after being told of his presence in her room at 1.56am on February 15 â€“ after spending Valentineâ€™s Day with her?

There are many questions he must answer.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/r ... 6009237108

samoht · Post: # 1042016Post **samoht** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:11am

Girl, Smirl.

I believe we basically remain the person we were at 17 or 18 the rest of our lives - our personalities have been largely shaped and formed by then.

If you're timid at 17 or 18 .. you remain timid, if you're headstrong you remain headstrong, if you're a manipulator (personipulator?) you remain a manipulator.

and if you've come from a good family and been given every chance in life but decided to stray anyway .. at least have the dignity not to act like a victim.

joffaboy · Post: # 1042022Post **joffaboy** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:19am

DWOODROW wrote: So you are telling me there was absolutely nothing to be done to shut this disgraceful little tripe up.

Onus of what to do is on you Einstein. You are the one making all the accusations

DWOODROW wrote:Your a wanka.

Have a look in the mirror idiot.

DWOODROW wrote:She is f****** with everyones lives and wants to be treated like a big girl. She gets into clubs by pretending to be a big girl.

No s.hit sherlock

DWOODROW wrote:Why not treat her like a big girl and take her to the f****** cleaners.

Wasn't legal action started by the Saints? And what happened when it did?

Fair Dinkum, do you live in a cave?

Also again how would have this stoped Nixon from being an idiot?

DWOODROW wrote:You are obviously happy that your beloved club has done f*** all to stop there players being named and shamed.

Please point to where I have said that.

DWOODROW wrote:What a joke you are

The only joke is you and your tantrum.

Wake up to yourself.

You bleat and carry on like a two year old because the club didn't do what you wanted.

When asked to elaborate, you are so braindead you can't, all you can do is abuse me.

Well the club attempted to pour cold water on this and seem to have until Nixon was so incredibly stupid to get caught up with this girl.

So maybe in your macho world of testosterone fueled rage, you attack 17.y.o girls, in the civilised world people attempt to help these type of disturbed people.

The club attempted that and succeeded. Nixon stuffed it, and now all you can do is take pot shots at the club, probably because your brother isn't getting a game.

Now get stuffed.

Con Gorozidis · Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:25am

She has done nothing illegal. No point ranting and raving at her.
So what did Nixon say on this interview anyhow? (i cant access the audio at work).

joffaboy · Post: # 1042026Post **joffaboy** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:29am

Con Gorozidis wrote:She has done nothing illegal. No point ranting and raving at her.
So what did Nixon say on this interview anyhow?

Well thats debatable.

Stole images

Now allegedly has stolen Credit Card information and used it fraudulently.

Sounds pretty illegal if true.

SENsei · Post: # 1042028Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:31am

If Ricky IS so sure of his innocence, why indeed not let the tapes out.

Surely that would clear him?

Con Gorozidis · Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:34am

joffaboy wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:She has done nothing illegal. No point ranting and raving at her.
So what did Nixon say on this interview anyhow?
Well thats debatable.

Stole images

Now allegedly has stolen Credit Card information and used it fraudulently.

Sounds pretty illegal if true.

if so its a police matter. press charges. anyway. what did he say?

markp · Post: # 1042030Post **markp** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:36am

SENsaintsational wrote:If Ricky IS so sure of his innocence, why indeed not let the tapes out.

Surely that would clear him?

Because he says they were stolen from his phone....

Why don't the Hun just release them if they're so certain they incriminate him?

It's all very grubby.

Johnny Member · Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:36am

joffaboy wrote: Well the club attempted to pour cold water on this and seem to have until Nixon was so incredibly stupid to get caught up with this girl.

It depends who you believe.

According to him, he was just helping her out.

According to her, she was trying to fry him from the start and looks to have succeeded.

For the life of me, I can't see how or why the public are taking her word for it! Especially why Saints fans are taking her word it! Her track record aint great

SENsei · Post: # 1042034Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:38am

markp wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:If Ricky IS so sure of his innocence, why indeed not let the tapes out.

Surely that would clear him?
Because he says they were stolen from his phone....

Why don't the Hun just release them if they're so certain they incriminate him?

It's all very grubby.

But still, he could lose his career over this. If the tapes clear him, then why not release them?

Thinline · Post: # 1042037Post **Thinline** » Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:40am

SENsaintsational wrote:
markp wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:If Ricky IS so sure of his innocence, why indeed not let the tapes out.

Surely that would clear him?
Because he says they were stolen from his phone....

Why don't the Hun just release them if they're so certain they incriminate him?

It's all very grubby.
But still, he could lose his career over this. If the tapes clear him, then why not release them?

Tapes are just tapes. Who took the pictures? Under what circumstances? Is there an entrapment in play? Were they stolen? Who took pix/film? Who can prove what?

Life is never simple.

Dr Spaceman · Mon 21 Feb 2011 9:43am

Thinline wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:
markp wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:If Ricky IS so sure of his innocence, why indeed not let the tapes out.

Surely that would clear him?
Because he says they were stolen from his phone....

Why don't the Hun just release them if they're so certain they incriminate him?

It's all very grubby.
But still, he could lose his career over this. If the tapes clear him, then why not release them?
Tapes are just tapes. Who took the pictures? Under what circumstances? Is there an entrapment in play? Were they stolen? Who took pix/film? Who can prove what?

Life is never simple.

3AW this morning played a grab from a KD YouTube from December.

In it she basically slams Nixon and suggests she's out to get him.

And yet this relationship is said to have occurred in 2011. Hmmmmm.