I'm not going to get into the whole argument about whether we should have gone there as it's been done to death on this forum. And frankly, I don't really know the true facts behind it (as distinct from all the rumours and gossip).
What I do know is that we are now at Seaford and we will be there for a very long time.
As such it is essential that the main stakeholders do all they can to make it work and to turn around the current misconceptions of it.
It is vital that the club make it a place players want to train at.
But it's also essential that the City of Frankston look at what they can do to improve the Seaford experience.
The Council made a big pitch for the relocation and invested heavily in it. Why? For the promotional advantages of having an elite sporting team located within their boundaries. Such bragging rights are wasted if all the media publicity about the place is negative (as it has been all year)
Rather than satisfy themselves with the thought that the facility has now been completed, both the St Kilda Football Club and the City of Frankston need to keep improving it. They need to consult the players and see how they can make the place even better.
Time for some bright people with bright ideas to come to the fore.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)