As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212034Post WinnersOnly »

As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF ! Taking Wilkes off is as bad as decision I have seen from a senior AFL coach, since RL not playing LB in GF. Gilbert hasn't touched either has Cripps I can't believe that decision!


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212036Post jonesy »

No,it's worse

Are we in good hands?


Bring back the Lockett era
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212037Post clarky449 »

Dont care if it was pre planned or not. Surely Watters is willing to change his thought during a match.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1759
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 300 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212040Post saintkid »

Watters' coaching was main reason we lost last week against Dockers. Not impressed so far with this bloke.


User avatar
sainterinsydney
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon 30 Nov 2009 11:03am
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212048Post sainterinsydney »

Why didn't he sub Riewoldt off? He is playing garbage football. O, I forgot, he is Nick Riewoldt and he never plays bad!


slider
Club Player
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 15 Feb 2012 8:43pm

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212053Post slider »

sainterinsydney wrote:Why didn't he sub Riewoldt off? He is playing garbage football. O, I forgot, he is Nick Riewoldt and he never plays bad!
Agree


slider
Club Player
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 15 Feb 2012 8:43pm

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212059Post slider »

WinnersOnly wrote:As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF ! Taking Wilkes off is as bad as decision I have seen from a senior AFL coach, since RL not playing LB in GF. Gilbert hasn't touched either has Cripps I can't believe that decision!
I was totally shocked he subbed Wilkes Roo should of come off


clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212064Post clarky449 »

Small tweak :roll:


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
sendmehomehappy
Club Player
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008 12:39am
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212066Post sendmehomehappy »

apparently a tiny hammy


" If thought corrupts language then language can also corrupt thought."

Politics and the English Language George Orwell
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212068Post Teflon »

Watters reckons he had a minor tweak.....hmm....Wilkes didnt look like it...


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Little Dozer
Club Player
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue 11 Jul 2006 4:44pm
Location: Forward Pocket, Outer side, Linton Street end or bay 38 Waverley

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212070Post Little Dozer »

Gilbert, Geary or Blake should have come off. They have all been disgraceful.


Are we waiting for a saviour?
I'm so sick of waiting!
I've been waiting my whole life!
This is a new day!
jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212072Post jonesy »

What a comprehensive load of sh*t! Covering his a$$ for a totally inept decision


Bring back the Lockett era
westcoast
Club Player
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 12:21am

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212074Post westcoast »

jonesy wrote:What a comprehensive load of sh*t! Covering his a$$ for a totally inept decision

couldn't agree more


User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1759
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 300 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212075Post saintkid »

jonesy wrote:What a comprehensive load of sh*t! Covering his a$$ for a totally inept decision
Exactly. The guy didn't want the red vest. You could easily see he was jacked with the stupid decision.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7610
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 442 times
Been thanked: 205 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212128Post bobmurray »

Plenty of well paid players at the club who should have been subbed before Wilkes....he'll be back at Sandy next week...

That'll be his reward for showing up the so called stars of the club..


Saints looking like a bottom 4 team in 2024.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212137Post SainterK »

Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212142Post joffaboy »

SainterK wrote:Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?

Well said, the usual footy experts showing their usual football knowledge.

Polo was very good in close and at the contests all through the last quarter.

tell me you armchair hero's how many points did Melbourne score in the last quarter?

What was that?

Sorry cant hear you.

How many was it again?


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212146Post clarky449 »

joffaboy wrote:
SainterK wrote:Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?

Well said, the usual footy experts showing their usual football knowledge.

Polo was very good in close and at the contests all through the last quarter.

tell me you armchair hero's how many points did Melbourne score in the last quarter?

What was that?

Sorry cant hear you.

How many was it again?
Yes, because taking Wilkes off and putting Polo on had a huge say in that. :roll: :roll:

I personally would of done Cripps for Polo.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4836
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 317 times
Been thanked: 451 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212147Post Moods »

SainterK wrote:Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?
This actually turned out to be spot on. Polo played really well when he came on - better than I expected. And Riewoldt also played very well in the last 1/4. Wilkes had kicked 3 goals from 4 kicks - good enough to stay on if injury free. For now, I'll back the coaching the staff though.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212150Post SainterK »

I love the move.

It was ballsy (not ladylike, but in this circumstance, completely appropriate)

He knew that the last quarter was going to be what it was, dare I say it, but I think we have a 'match day coach'


User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1759
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 141 times
Been thanked: 300 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212154Post saintkid »

joffaboy wrote:
SainterK wrote:Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?

Well said, the usual footy experts showing their usual football knowledge.

Polo was very good in close and at the contests all through the last quarter.

tell me you armchair hero's how many points did Melbourne score in the last quarter?

What was that?

Sorry cant hear you.

How many was it again?

No you guys are missing the point that there were other passengers tonight that deserved to be subbed before Wilkes.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212158Post sunsaint »

joffaboy wrote:
SainterK wrote:Oh for goodness sake guys.

It was actually the perfect decision.

The last quarter was always going to be full of stoppages, holding on for dear life, contested footy....Polo was just what was needed.

Did you honestly think it was going to pretty?

Well said, the usual footy experts showing their usual football knowledge.

Polo was very good in close and at the contests all through the last quarter.

tell me you armchair hero's how many points did Melbourne score in the last quarter?

What was that?

Sorry cant hear you.

How many was it again?
to both of you, that's not the point
there were others more deserving of the pine than wilkes
while i dont agree with some of the players mentioned above
there were others...


Seeya
*************
User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212159Post Iceman234 »

I think the point was Wilkes had a slight tweak.

Don't believe the coach if you don't want to, but I'm with him on this.

Some rather embarrassing comments here...


Image
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212161Post clarky449 »

SainterK wrote:I love the move.

It was ballsy (not ladylike, but in this circumstance, completely appropriate)

He knew that the last quarter was going to be what it was, dare I say it, but I think we have a 'match day coach'
We didnt have one before? :roll:


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: As bad a decision as Luke Ball GF !

Post: # 1212166Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:I love the move.

It was ballsy (not ladylike, but in this circumstance, completely appropriate)

He knew that the last quarter was going to be what it was, dare I say it, but I think we have a 'match day coach'
How can taking a supposedly injured player off be called "ballsy" and "match day coach" defining?

IF Wilkes wasnt injured it was dumb - pure and simple. We kicked 1.4 or 1.5 in the last, constantly bombed the ball in there and couldnt take a mark to save our life. Milne sagged off out the back and until Gartlett got injured was being pantsed in the last. Riewoldt was nowhere near it. Had Wilkes not been injured (would like to hear more on this) whose to say we couldnt have won by 4 or 5?

I too reckon Polo on as a sub was a good move - Id have bought him on for Gram/Cripps IF Wilkes wasnt injured.....

Wouldnt call that move "ballsy" though.....


“Yeah….nah””
Post Reply