MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Which method would you prefer the MRP/Tribunal to adopt when assessing player suspensions
1 - reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
2 - reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
3 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
4 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
5 - reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
6 - reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
7 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
8 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
1 - reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
2 - reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
3 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
4 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
5 - reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
6 - reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
7 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + reduced sentence for guilty plea
8 - NO reduced sentence for a good record + NO loading for a bad record + NO reduced sentence for guilty plea
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Here I will kick it off
P66 prefers 1
I prefer 3
P66 prefers 1
I prefer 3
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- Kate
- Club Player
- Posts: 1174
- Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2004 1:58pm
- Location: Emerald
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I prefer option 4.
A "good" record is too hard to define. number of seasons? number of games? fines? junior record?
Repeat offenders do need to be dealt with more harshly to get the message across.
I think all reports should go to the tribunal. I feel uncomfortable with the concept of accepting a penalty because there is a "risk" in arguing the case.
A "good" record is too hard to define. number of seasons? number of games? fines? junior record?
Repeat offenders do need to be dealt with more harshly to get the message across.
I think all reports should go to the tribunal. I feel uncomfortable with the concept of accepting a penalty because there is a "risk" in arguing the case.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10369
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 183 times
- Been thanked: 694 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Give the guilty party a choice between 10 weeks or his victim being allowed to do the same to him. Betcha wellingham would take 10 weeks over taking what he dished out. Steven baker would've taken love taps on his knuckles over the ten, but the ten over the farmer incident.
Easy.
Easy.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8988
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
A vote on Saintsational, where ordinary members get one vote, plugger66 gets 10 votes and I get 1000 votes. It's the good, the bad and the ugly (not necessarily in that order of course). Can't be fairer than that.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Thanks Kate for your no nonsense anwserKate wrote:I prefer option 4.
A "good" record is too hard to define. number of seasons? number of games? fines? junior record?
Repeat offenders do need to be dealt with more harshly to get the message across.
I think all reports should go to the tribunal. I feel uncomfortable with the concept of accepting a penalty because there is a "risk" in arguing the case.
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I'm with BM.
Common sense.
If it looks bad, it is bad.
Would anyone really argue if Wellingham got 5?
Looked a 5 to me. High, likely intent, player broken.
Common sense.
If it looks bad, it is bad.
Would anyone really argue if Wellingham got 5?
Looked a 5 to me. High, likely intent, player broken.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
- Contact:
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Option 1 BUT with a clause that if you have been charged with intentional conduct there is no reduction for an early plea.
If you intend to cause a reportable offence then you should pay for it.
If you intend to cause a reportable offence then you should pay for it.
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Devilhead wrote:Here I will kick it off
P66 prefers 1
I prefer 3
Do you read what I say? Obviously not but thanks for answering. I wouldnt have a reduced penalty for pleading guilty in certain circumstances. Hocking and Wellingham shouldnt get a discount as they were obviously guilty. I would leave it to the MRP to say no guilty discount applies in certain cases. The first 2 parts of number one is how I would vote.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
plugger66 wrote:Devilhead wrote:Here I will kick it off
P66 prefers 1
I prefer 3
Do you read what I say? Obviously not but thanks for answering. I wouldnt have a reduced penalty for pleading guilty in certain circumstances. Hocking and Wellingham shouldnt get a discount as they were obviously guilty. I would leave it to the MRP to say no guilty discount applies in certain cases. The first 2 parts of number one is how I would vote.
Hocking low impact...what a crock of shtt....mrp can review as they please
Did not Goddard have medium impact?
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Freebird wrote:plugger66 wrote:Devilhead wrote:Here I will kick it off
P66 prefers 1
I prefer 3
Do you read what I say? Obviously not but thanks for answering. I wouldnt have a reduced penalty for pleading guilty in certain circumstances. Hocking and Wellingham shouldnt get a discount as they were obviously guilty. I would leave it to the MRP to say no guilty discount applies in certain cases. The first 2 parts of number one is how I would vote.
Hocking low impact...what a crock of shtt....mrp can review as they please
Did not Goddard have medium impact?
Yes because it is done on the doctors report from the club of the player who got hit. If you dont like low impact then you think our Doctor is a liar or incompetent.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
So all club doctors are part of the MRP committee now??plugger66 wrote: Yes because it is done on the doctors report from the club of the player who got hit. If you dont like low impact then you think our Doctor is a liar or incompetent.
And all club doctors are tuned into each other and to what exactly constitutes low medium and high impact
Wow - This system is brilliant!!
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Devilhead wrote:So all club doctors are part of the MRP committee now??plugger66 wrote: Yes because it is done on the doctors report from the club of the player who got hit. If you dont like low impact then you think our Doctor is a liar or incompetent.
And all club doctors are tuned into each other and to what exactly constitutes low medium and high impact
Wow - This system is brilliant!!
I dont think anyone said that. The doctor sends in a report on the player hit. Maybe they shouldnt. Maybe the MRP should find 3 days after they revue reports that the player hit is missing because the kick to the leg actually broke his leg or the punch to the face actually broke his nose even though on the day the player looked fine.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Three weeks for breaking a jaw...2 wks for love tap - system works well.
MRP sucked in by diving players...shamefully unprofessional.
Its obvious if you make contact with a Stevie J the consequences are going to be more detrimental than the reality of the hit.
No matter what spin you put on it 66 it does not add up
MRP sucked in by diving players...shamefully unprofessional.
Its obvious if you make contact with a Stevie J the consequences are going to be more detrimental than the reality of the hit.
No matter what spin you put on it 66 it does not add up
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5442
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
- Contact:
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I wonder what the Freo doctor said in his report two seasons ago when Judd hit Pavlich with enough force to require stitches in his cheek but not enough to warrant a report.plugger66 wrote:I dont think anyone said that. The doctor sends in a report on the player hit. Maybe they shouldnt. Maybe the MRP should find 3 days after they revue reports that the player hit is missing because the kick to the leg actually broke his leg or the punch to the face actually broke his nose even though on the day the player looked fine.
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Freebird wrote:Three weeks for breaking a jaw...2 wks for love tap - system works well.
MRP sucked in by diving players...shamefully unprofessional.
Its obvious if you make contact with a Stevie J the consequences are going to be more detrimental than the reality of the hit.
No matter what spin you put on it 66 it does not add up
5 for breaking your jaw and 3 for a behind play incident that the North Doctor obviously said hurt the player otherwise our club would have appealed unless of course our club is incompetent. Dont understand the Stevie J thing or the diving players. System has it faults. The older system had more IMO. If someone knows a better system Im sure the AFL would like to hear about it. Maybe we should be like soccer and send guys off and then find later it was an incorrect decision. There would be a 500 page thread if it cost our club a game.
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Life Long Saint wrote:I wonder what the Freo doctor said in his report two seasons ago when Judd hit Pavlich with enough force to require stitches in his cheek but not enough to warrant a report.plugger66 wrote:I dont think anyone said that. The doctor sends in a report on the player hit. Maybe they shouldnt. Maybe the MRP should find 3 days after they revue reports that the player hit is missing because the kick to the leg actually broke his leg or the punch to the face actually broke his nose even though on the day the player looked fine.
Dont think they asked back then. Probably means they have made the right decision and now ask the club doctors.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
And all club doctors would come to the same conclusions??plugger66 wrote:Life Long Saint wrote:I wonder what the Freo doctor said in his report two seasons ago when Judd hit Pavlich with enough force to require stitches in his cheek but not enough to warrant a report.plugger66 wrote:I dont think anyone said that. The doctor sends in a report on the player hit. Maybe they shouldnt. Maybe the MRP should find 3 days after they revue reports that the player hit is missing because the kick to the leg actually broke his leg or the punch to the face actually broke his nose even though on the day the player looked fine.
Dont think they asked back then. Probably means they have made the right decision and now ask the club doctors.
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
Devilhead wrote:plugger66 wrote:I wonder what the Freo doctor said in his report two seasons ago when Judd hit Pavlich with enough force to require stitches in his cheek but not enough to warrant a report.Life Long Saint wrote:I dont think anyone said that. The doctor sends in a report on the player hit. Maybe they shouldnt. Maybe the MRP should find 3 days after they revue reports that the player hit is missing because the kick to the leg actually broke his leg or the punch to the face actually broke his nose even though on the day the player looked fine.
And all club doctors would come to the same conclusions??
I doubt it. So we shouldnt ask and as i said earlier just find out how injured they are when they cant play the next week which is 3 days after the MRP meet.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I say scrap that idea completely and go for an offense equals X amount of games regardless of impact, good and bad records etc. The only difference would be in play or not. Behind play should be doubled
Eg
all trips = 1 match in play and 2 match out of play.
King hit ( Hall ) = 10 matches and 20 matches out of play.
etc
This will put an end to the lotto of rubbed out games, as everyone would know what they are going to get.
Eg
all trips = 1 match in play and 2 match out of play.
King hit ( Hall ) = 10 matches and 20 matches out of play.
etc
This will put an end to the lotto of rubbed out games, as everyone would know what they are going to get.
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I prefer that regardless of what St Kilda players do, we should never be reported. If a player from another team hits one of our blokes its an automatic 10+ week penalty pending severity of hit. Can't be any farer than that
Qld Saints Supporter Group
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
- Location: Gippsland
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I'm OK with 1.
A good record should mean something in your favour, a bad one should mean the opposite. The reason for the ealy plea discount is to reduce the number of tribunal sittings because of time/expense, and that's reasonable; matches a plea bargain the the judicial system.
A good record should mean something in your favour, a bad one should mean the opposite. The reason for the ealy plea discount is to reduce the number of tribunal sittings because of time/expense, and that's reasonable; matches a plea bargain the the judicial system.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
I'll go with 1 also.
I hate it when a player gets a suspension then the intreptation changes such that he would've got off/got less weeks but the loading carries. Can work the other way also.
Hard to sort that one out though.
I hate it when a player gets a suspension then the intreptation changes such that he would've got off/got less weeks but the loading carries. Can work the other way also.
Hard to sort that one out though.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8275
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 1149 times
Re: MRP - Your Preferred Method of Assessing Suspensions
As I said in the other thread - a good record should not be rewarded it should be expected - hence I am against reductions for good records
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!