Jonathan Giles?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Jonathan Giles?

Post: # 1262277Post sax »

Has reportedly turned his back on GWS because of a low contract offer.

He's 201cm/99kg, will be 25yo at start of next season. (8/1/88)

He played 20 games this season, kicked 18 goals, had 442 (22.1 per game) hitouts and 285 (14.25 per game) disposals.

Compared with Ben McEvoy

200cm/98kg. DOB - 11/7/89.

Played 16 games, 7 goals, 405 (25.3 pg) hit outs, 196 (12.25 pg) disposals.

They could have a very good partnership!
Last edited by sax on Fri 14 Sep 2012 4:04pm, edited 1 time in total.


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262316Post savatage »

Would be interested in him over most of the other ruckman mentioned.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262318Post gringo »

dream team stats alone make him attractive- i can't actually say I've watched enough to know how good he is.


User avatar
Animal Enclosure
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2364
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
Location: Saints Footy Central

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262320Post Animal Enclosure »

Giles is definitely the type of ruckman that would work well with Big Mac.

I reckon he'll want to go to a club where he can be the #1 ruck though.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262322Post dragit »

He might be the #1 ruckmen if he came to us… we seem to be scared of getting someone that might oust McEvoy, but the fact is that we are smacked nearly every week in actual ruck contests, will Ben improve significantly in this area in the next year or 2?


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262329Post savatage »

I'd rather the best ruckman we have play the majority of time in the ruck. People are a bit too sentimental here about players. If we were to recruit someone better than Mcevoy in the centre square - then what's the bad part about him getting more game time in front of Big Ben? Stronger club > individual success.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262335Post matrix »

grab him!


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262347Post Old Mate »

Ruckman are overrated and McEvoy is doing fine, we need more quality ball winners. We should just draft a state level spud for back up if McEvoy goes down and then recruit/rookie a young ruckman to develop.


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262354Post sax »

Old Mate wrote:Ruckman are overrated and McEvoy is doing fine, we need more quality ball winners. We should just draft a state level spud for back up if McEvoy goes down and then recruit/rookie a young ruckman to develop.

Really? All the finals teams besides maybe Geelong have better ruckmen than us.

Hawks - Roughead & Hale
Swans - Mumford & Pike
Crows - Jacobs
West Coast - Cox & Natenui
Freo - Sandilands
Pies - Jolly
Kangas - Goldstein & McIntosh (inj)
Cats - West (maybe)

Ruckmen are definately NOT overated, that's one reason we didn't make the finals!


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262356Post dragit »

+ some below us…
Maric, Kreuzer, Hampson, Warnock, Ryder, Bellchambers, Hille, Jacobs, etc etc

Big Mac might become a good ruckman, but at the moment there are a lot of players in the comp that can beat him in actual 'ruck work'


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262362Post Old Mate »

sax wrote:
Old Mate wrote:Ruckman are overrated and McEvoy is doing fine, we need more quality ball winners. We should just draft a state level spud for back up if McEvoy goes down and then recruit/rookie a young ruckman to develop.

Really? All the finals teams besides maybe Geelong have better ruckmen than us.

Hawks - Roughead & Hale
Swans - Mumford & Pike
Crows - Jacobs
West Coast - Cox & Natenui
Freo - Sandilands
Pies - Jolly
Kangas - Goldstein & McIntosh (inj)
Cats - West (maybe)

Ruckmen are definately NOT overated, that's one reason we didn't make the finals!
More like better/more depth in their midfield. And the only club that really stands out in the ruck depart. is WC.


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262364Post sax »

Old Mate wrote:
sax wrote:
Old Mate wrote:Ruckman are overrated and McEvoy is doing fine, we need more quality ball winners. We should just draft a state level spud for back up if McEvoy goes down and then recruit/rookie a young ruckman to develop.

Really? All the finals teams besides maybe Geelong have better ruckmen than us.

Hawks - Roughead & Hale
Swans - Mumford & Pike
Crows - Jacobs
West Coast - Cox & Natenui
Freo - Sandilands
Pies - Jolly
Kangas - Goldstein & McIntosh (inj)
Cats - West (maybe)

Ruckmen are definately NOT overated, that's one reason we didn't make the finals!
More like better/more depth in their midfield. And the only club that really stands out in the ruck depart. is WC.
I said ONE of the reasons!

Midfield depth is another reason!

Yeh, the Eagles stand out, but they are all better ruckmen than Mac!


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262378Post Gershwin »

Ask any midfielder if he would prefer to play to a ruckman winning the hit-outs or to one losing the hit-outs and I'm sure I know what they would say. McEvoy's poor ruckwork is certainly an issue.


summertime and the living is easy ........
Stillwaiting
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262384Post Stillwaiting »

Old Mate wrote:Ruckman are overrated and McEvoy is doing fine, we need more quality ball winners. We should just draft a state level spud for back up if McEvoy goes down and then recruit/rookie a young ruckman to develop.
I agree that ben is going ok especially around the ground, but he gets beaten in the ruck and mids might look a whole lot better if they had the ruckman putting the ball down their throat. I can remember Ben winning a ruck contest near the goals and he put it down the troat of one of our smalls who had an easy goal because of that. Put that same ruckwork at centre bounces and we win a lot more clearances.


I love this club
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262391Post Old Mate »

A lot of the time the centre bounces/throw-ins are a lottery given the poor centre bounces and shallow throw-ins.


Stillwaiting
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262392Post Stillwaiting »

Old Mate wrote:A lot of the time the centre bounces/throw-ins are a lottery given the poor centre bounces and shallow throw-ins.
But the centre bounces are not a lottery, I think there is a huge advantage in giving our mids first use of the ball and that will make them look a whole lot better. I think Ben has a lot of upside and is getting better all the time so I have no issues with him but I think we need another ruckman who can win the hitouts


I love this club
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262397Post Con Gorozidis »

If he walked into our club Id welcome him with open arms - but i wouldnt be throwing big cash or good draft picks at him.


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2174
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262411Post Zed »

I dont really rate Giles, I think he got a guernsey at GWS by default .. and to his credit grabbed it with both hands. I think he is getting ahead of himself if he thinks he can walk out and be a walk up start on big bucks somewhere else.

Having said that, we need another ruckmen, and if he came to us at low cost then its good insurance. Ruckmen are in short supply, and no doubt he will get picked up somewhere, but I'll bet he is no longer in the system 3 years from now, unless he stays at GWS or a bottom 4 club.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
70s sainter
Club Player
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun 09 Oct 2011 6:52pm

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262412Post 70s sainter »

Hes an absolute gun - would be very very happy if we somehow got him .


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7834
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 562 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262416Post magnifisaint »

Get him!

Now!!


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262417Post Sainternist »

sax wrote:He played 20 games this season, kicked 18 goals, had 442 (22.1 per game) hitouts and 285 (14.25 per game) disposals.
A ruckman who is also no stranger to kicking the odd goal.

It'd be a win-win if we can snare this sort of talent.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Darren
Club Player
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu 19 Oct 2006 8:46pm
Location: Australia

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262418Post Darren »

Gonna be a star ruckman in the future. Get him now!


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262419Post dragit »

Darren wrote:Gonna be a star ruckman in the future. Get him now!
Is he? He'll be 25 at the beginning of next year, has spent 4 years on ports list already.


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Johnathan Giles?

Post: # 1262421Post WinnersOnly »

We should have got him last year... he will cost a lot more now and too similar too Big Mc to be an upgrade. Would be much better off getting Tom Hickey or similar...


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
SaintSimmo
Club Player
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Jonathan Giles?

Post: # 1262423Post SaintSimmo »

I read an article before saying the Giants want a key defender in a trade for Giles. So unless the Giants consider Raph to be a key defender I don't think we are much of a chance, and I'm not sure that Macca and Giles can play in the same side.


Sainter for life.
Post Reply