Match Review v Suns

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7040
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311287Post mad saint guy »

Well that was incredibly disappointing. Other than Geary, Armo and Steven, no saints players looked particularly interested tonight. Our pressure was appalling and our ball use was below standard. We don't seem to have progressed in any significant way from last year. We still get killed on the rebound, our midfield still struggles to win clearances and lacks pace.

We saw that four small forwards just doesn't work. It's too great a cost to have two or three forwards doing nothing but take away from midfield rotations. Saad and TDL obviously did nothing and while Milera kicked a few, I feel he still isn't up to scratch in general player; too many soft tackles, errant handballs and poor efforts. Milney didn't have a great game but he should have finished with at least 2, probably 3 goals. Gwilt is still being played as a key defender and leaking goals like crazy (while turning the ball over far too much), Gilbert and Jones are still liabilities with the ball and neither apply pressure or run as well as they used to. It's sad to say but Lenny looked really, really slow tonight. He'll still be a good midfielder but time is catching up with him.

The positives for me were the fantastic games from Armo and Geary, while Steven's run even in the last quarter was excellent. Stanley also did well in defence and looks like a genuine key defensive option. Maister did all he could, and needed more support from the smalls. Roberton tries hard but doesn't seem particularly good at anything - not sure what his upside is. Newnes also tries hard but isn't up to AFL standard yet; he's too easily pushed off the ball and loses his feet too often. Blake did what he could but the defence would be much more secure with Simpkin in there.

Players who should be under serious pressure: Gilbert, Jones, Roberton, Blake, TDL, Milera, Newnes

It won't happen, but my changes for next week would be

OUT: TDL, Jones, Roberton, Newnes, Gilbert (Fisher if fit)
IN: Montagna, Wright, Simpkin, Schneider, Lee (Blake)


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311309Post BigMart »

Riewoldt good

Armitage had good patches, Jones blanketed Bennell, Geary excellent...

Saad, Hickey, Ray Milne, Maister, would all get 1/10 from me

Steven and Gilbert lack composure with the ball......


3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311317Post 3rd generation saint »

TDL only had a quarter, so a little unfair.
Thought Gilbert was ok tonight, Jones and Newnes would be on the outer for next week.


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
jays
Club Player
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008 10:58pm
Location: games
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311318Post jays »

Shocking game looked old and slow


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7040
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311344Post mad saint guy »

BigMart wrote:Riewoldt good

Armitage had good patches, Jones blanketed Bennell, Geary excellent...

Saad, Hickey, Ray Milne, Maister, would all get 1/10 from me

Steven and Gilbert lack composure with the ball......
Saad had a shocker, Hickey did well to win taps but couldn't take marks like he usually would. Ray made about three horrible errors but was otherwise ok. Milney had a pretty typical Milney game, was unlucky to hit the post a couple of times and he'd be getting praise if they went through. Maister worked his arse off all night to provide an option and a contest - that's his job done IMO.

What really struck me tonight is the fact that we no longer have any of the genuine superstars of the competition. Roo is no longer in the top 5 tall forwards, Lenny and Dal probably aren't in the top 10 mids and we don't have any amazing flankers. Ablett won GC the game tonight through sheer brilliance and we had no one who could answer that.


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311366Post fugazi »

Newnes very ordinary...he is only a kid, and kicks it nice, but got thrashed tonight


Nee!
St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311372Post St Ick »

Riewoldt was beaten many times by Thompson. Its not all up to Roo, but after 1/4 time he was disappointing - wouldn't call him good, especially in a game where he should have dominated.

Steven and Armo were good, Lenny tried, Dal quiet, they haven't got enough talent to help them in the middle.

They looked tired, slow, and when they went forward were too flashy and not clean enough.

Surprised noone has mentioned Milne, who was perhaps the biggest disappointment all night.

I agree too with Newnes comment, love the kid but he needs to be stronger over the ball.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
noob
Club Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:32am

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311381Post noob »

Was it just me or were some of the players looking soft and not going in?


saints66
Club Player
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed 01 Dec 2004 9:04pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311385Post saints66 »

jays wrote:Shocking game looked old and slow
and we just spent a couple of hundred thousand dollars in America on a Club junket to improve our tiredness!!!! hmmmmmm


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7040
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311392Post mad saint guy »

fugazi wrote:Newnes very ordinary...he is only a kid, and kicks it nice, but got thrashed tonight
Agreed, and I think this is the standard he has always displayed. He just doesn't have the strength to match it in the AFL right now. His effort is great and he has good skills so I'm sure he trains brilliantly, but put him against an opponent with 10kgs on him and he's a liability.

Watters now has to decide whether to try and make something of this season or to persevere with the likes of Newnes. If we go all out and play our best side for 2013 we might be able to scrape into the finals with a bit of luck, or we could concede a bottom four finish and use this as a rebuilding year.


User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311438Post Verdun66 »

Thought Roberton did ok until the tide swept over us....or we stopped. Take your pick. Steven, Armo, Geary good. Gwilt was good until he got overwhelmed. Dal had good numbers including 9 tackles, but didn't really influence things. Maister kept trying, always contesting, but the crumbers just didn't have it. Roo good in patches. McEvoy is a workhorse, but was ready for the knackers yard at the end.

Milne, Ray, Newnes, Blake, Saad not too good. Hickey other than a few taps seemed shy. Jones kept Bennell quiet until he got moved on to Ablett when the game was gone. Did his job, and got 22 disposals, so he is clearly our new whipping boy.


User avatar
hungry for a premiership
Club Player
Posts: 856
Joined: Fri 08 Oct 2010 2:01am

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311541Post hungry for a premiership »

I'm surprised people don't really rate Hayes' game. I thought he was best afield for us. Again.

Gotta say I'm bordering on disgusted at Dal Santo's effort though. He should be by far and away our best mid, and a genuine matchwinner, but at no stage in the precedings tonight did he even slightly impose himself on the game. Maybe he needs another spell in the magoo's like what Lyon did to him and milne in '08.


"Too big, too strong, too whatever."
lloyd21
Club Player
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri 28 Sep 2012 4:53pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311648Post lloyd21 »

Positives were getting games into kids ,we knew it was a development year a bad loss though just means Lee , Murdoch,Wright , Hickey ,Siposs ,Stanley will be developed going forward.

But seriously suggesting Kosi blake jones as the future you are kidding. Given their time again they would have picked Wright as sub. Pretty clear you can't have Milne Saad Milera TdL in together they have no midfield depth as a result .Need midfield players thru draft that is the only way back.


User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5286
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311651Post Munga »

For a team touted for their small crumbing forwards, I didn't see any crumbers. I was always waiting for Milne, Saad, Milera, TDL to zap past the pack...never happened.


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
saints66
Club Player
Posts: 382
Joined: Wed 01 Dec 2004 9:04pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311653Post saints66 »

fugazi wrote:Newnes very ordinary...he is only a kid, and kicks it nice, but got thrashed tonight
most of GCS are kids


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311655Post SaintPav »

St Ick wrote:Riewoldt was beaten many times by Thompson. Its not all up to Roo, but after 1/4 time he was disappointing - wouldn't call him good, especially in a game where he should have dominated.

Steven and Armo were good, Lenny tried, Dal quiet, they haven't got enough talent to help them in the middle.

They looked tired, slow, and when they went forward were too flashy and not clean enough.

Surprised noone has mentioned Milne, who was perhaps the biggest disappointment all night.

I agree too with Newnes comment, love the kid but he needs to be stronger over the ball.
I don't agree with you that Roo should have dominated when we were not doing well in the midfield.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
jmac101
Club Player
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue 23 Aug 2005 5:03pm

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311661Post jmac101 »

hungry for a premiership wrote:I'm surprised people don't really rate Hayes' game. I thought he was best afield for us. Again.

Gotta say I'm bordering on disgusted at Dal Santo's effort though. He should be by far and away our best mid, and a genuine matchwinner, but at no stage in the precedings tonight did he even slightly impose himself on the game. Maybe he needs another spell in the magoo's like what Lyon did to him and milne in '08.
Bit harsh on Dal i feel. Not his best game but not alone there. At least he still tackled hard.

May have also been carrying a groin problem most of the game.

Agree on Newnes. Got bumped off the ball a bit too easily tonight unfortunately.

Siposs was good for first 2 and a half quarters. Then went missing in a big way.

Really concerning effort given the tigers are up next. If we don't fix up the clearances, riewoldt and vickery could each kick a big bag.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311666Post SainterK »

Munga wrote:For a team touted for their small crumbing forwards, I didn't see any crumbers. I was always waiting for Milne, Saad, Milera, TDL to zap past the pack...never happened.
Crumb off who?

Crashing packs is selfless and unheralded.

There is an art to it IMO

Did the stats in 09 and 10 and should do it again. Who plays kpf when our smalls lift


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311667Post saintsRrising »

mad saint guy wrote:Well that was incredibly disappointing. Other than Geary, Armo and Steven, no saints players looked particularly interested tonight. Our pressure was appalling and our ball use was below standard. We don't seem to have progressed in any significant way from last year. We still get killed on the rebound, our midfield still struggles to win clearances and lacks pace.

We saw that four small forwards just doesn't work. It's too great a cost to have two or three forwards doing nothing but take away from midfield rotations. Saad and TDL obviously did nothing and while Milera kicked a few, I feel he still isn't up to scratch in general player; too many soft tackles, errant handballs and poor efforts. Milney didn't have a great game but he should have finished with at least 2, probably 3 goals. Gwilt is still being played as a key defender and leaking goals like crazy (while turning the ball over far too much), Gilbert and Jones are still liabilities with the ball and neither apply pressure or run as well as they used to. It's sad to say but Lenny looked really, really slow tonight. He'll still be a good midfielder but time is catching up with him.

The positives for me were the fantastic games from Armo and Geary, while Steven's run even in the last quarter was excellent. Stanley also did well in defence and looks like a genuine key defensive option. Maister did all he could, and needed more support from the smalls. Roberton tries hard but doesn't seem particularly good at anything - not sure what his upside is. Newnes also tries hard but isn't up to AFL standard yet; he's too easily pushed off the ball and loses his feet too often. Blake did what he could but the defence would be much more secure with Simpkin in there.

Players who should be under serious pressure: Gilbert, Jones, Roberton, Blake, TDL, Milera, Newnes

It won't happen, but my changes for next week would be

OUT: TDL, Jones, Roberton, Newnes, Gilbert (Fisher if fit)
IN: Montagna, Wright, Simpkin, Schneider, Lee (Blake)
Pretty fair summary.

Blake should be an out.

Ben was pretty awful. Newnes was disappointing

As VS pointed out we played one tall too many.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10708
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 809 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311668Post ace »

I am still in Europe for the opening game of the season.
Is there any point in my returning to watch the Saints?
Last year they lost to an inspired but basically pathetic Port Adelaide team that was enthused by a new season.
Port's true quality soon returned.
Now the Saints have done it again, lost to an enthused Gold Coast.
Every loss counts in an AFL season where finals places are decided by tiny percentage differences and draws.

How is it that a team can be decimated by almost 100 points one year and then win the opener next year.
Simply one team was enthused and the other just going through the motions.

Teams that just go through the motions of playing football don't win premierships or even make the finals.

If only the weather would stay cold in Europe, I would stay and keep skiing.
This football season is already so predictable, Saints playing like professionals but without enthusiasm and failing to even make the finals. AGAIN.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
deadman walking
Club Player
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed 26 Apr 2006 6:40pm

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1311753Post deadman walking »

how can we win with 3 ruckman in the side ?


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1312098Post saintsRrising »

deadman walking wrote:how can we win with 3 ruckman in the side ?
Stanley, while capable of playing as a ruckman, is agile enough to play key position and flank.

So IMO we actually played two ruckman last night, but that was one too many.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Match Review v Suns

Post: # 1312141Post plugger66 »

saintsRrising wrote:
deadman walking wrote:how can we win with 3 ruckman in the side ?
Stanley, while capable of playing as a ruckman, is agile enough to play key position and flank.

So IMO we actually played two ruckman last night, but that was one too many.

You say that but with Stanley and Blake playing as key backs Ben would have had to euck all night on his own. he may have died if that was the case.


Post Reply