Whose Up For A Clearance

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338290Post Teflon »

Anyone?

Let me guess..... we are rebuilding and played a more senior side with experience ??? Cause a midfield containing Dal Santo, Montagna, Hayes, Steven and Jones is inexperienced??

Nup

It was all the umpires fault??

Nup

The umpires are rebuilding??

Nup

Maybe....just maybe..... We don't have the right set ups? The right talent sitting in the coaching box??

I think Watters is a developer who NEEDS help tactically and we aren't helping him

What a disgraceful performance.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338298Post Munga »

Might be time to promote Curren and bring him straight in


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338302Post savatage »

Tommy Ledger needs to come in. Clearance king. Yes we've all heard about disposal blah blah...but C Jones seems to get games.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338303Post saintspremiers »

Yes Watters isn't a master coach by a million miles.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338309Post SainterK »

It's not the coaches box

Ben isn't a tap ruckman and played v someone who is.

Tap to advantage and dogs goal, was hard to watch


User avatar
battye
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5926
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 1:36pm
Contact:

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338311Post battye »

I think this is a ruck problem to be honest. McEvoy has always been poor with hitouts to advantage, so right away the midfielders have an uphill task.
If their job is to rove off the opposition ruckman, why bother having a ruckman at all.

It's an area where McEvoy needs to improve. Just one area that's obvious from TV is that he never times his jump well.


Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!

TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview

Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
User avatar
Greg T
Club Player
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 825 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338342Post Greg T »

Teflon wrote:Anyone?

Let me guess..... we are rebuilding and played a more senior side with experience ??? Cause a midfield containing Dal Santo, Montagna, Hayes, Steven and Jones is inexperienced??

Nup

It was all the umpires fault??

Nup

The umpires are rebuilding??

Nup

Maybe....just maybe..... We don't have the right set ups? The right talent sitting in the coaching box??

I think Watters is a developer who NEEDS help tactically and we aren't helping him

What a disgraceful performance.
Certainly was Teflon ,maybe st pav from wa may enlighten us on the joys of Dean Laidleys coaching skills again ...


100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338351Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:It's not the coaches box

Ben isn't a tap ruckman and played v someone who is.

Tap to advantage and dogs goal, was hard to watch
Oh it's the coaches Box

I don't think bens ever gonna be a tap ruck


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338356Post savatage »

Ben's biggest problem is that for a big guy he has absolutely no physical presence with the contest.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338360Post SainterK »

Teflon wrote:
SainterK wrote:It's not the coaches box

Ben isn't a tap ruckman and played v someone who is.

Tap to advantage and dogs goal, was hard to watch
Oh it's the coaches Box

I don't think bens ever gonna be a tap ruck
Disagree

Ben tells them what he's going to do and then his opponent does what he was going to do

Would rather the guys position to apply pressure and tackles


User avatar
battye
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5926
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 1:36pm
Contact:

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338365Post battye »

Either way, McEvoy is the best we've got. Let's just hope that in a few years time when the current dominant rucks have retired, McEvoy by default becomes one of the premier rucks in the league.


Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!

TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview

Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338387Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:
Teflon wrote:
SainterK wrote:It's not the coaches box

Ben isn't a tap ruckman and played v someone who is.

Tap to advantage and dogs goal, was hard to watch
Disagree

Ben tells them what he's going to do and then his opponent does what he was going to do

Would rather the guys position to apply pressure and tackles
If thats so it will be up the coaches to fix it - its their problem.

No side can continue to give away the ball out of the middle like we do. Even when we do get a clearance as someone else on here pointed out and it was obvious tonight......its a scrambled, shanked, mongrel scrub forward with no purpose.

BIG PROBLEM this one.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9040
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 351 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338396Post perfectionist »

The only time we looked like getting it away was when Tom Hickey was in the centre. Ben was slaughtered and has been, in the ruck, all year. He can't jump at all so is never going to improve.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338401Post SainterK »

Goodness i agree with you.

He was better for being in there as well


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338417Post Spinner »

What is with this myth that he is a developer of kids? It hasn't happened yet!

It might but not yet...


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338419Post Teflon »

Spinner wrote:What is with this myth that he is a developer of kids? It hasn't happened yet!

It might but not yet...
compare to his predecessor hes just about Les Tentyman youth worker


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338428Post Munga »

I'll sound like GT here, but ruckman are a waste of time if they can't ruck!
In 2004 we had crap ruckmen, pretty much just Knobel with a side of Blake and Kosi. Rubbish hitouts.
BUT we were awesome with the clearances with Harvey, Hayes, Thompson and Powell.

Our guys should be playing every ruck contest like we'll lose it. Much improvement will come.


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338431Post SainterK »

Spinner wrote:What is with this myth that he is a developer of kids? It hasn't happened yet!

It might but not yet...
Wright, Geary, Steven, Newnes, Webster all showing a bit

Saad Milera dreaded second year blues IMO


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338434Post savatage »

It's not second year blues K.

Saad is not clean enough but he has a physical presence. Milera has probably got the cleanest or one of the cleanest skill sets in the league - with absolutely no physical presence. That means that unfortuntely Milera will probably not make it at this level, at least not consistently. Saad can IF he improves his hands. If he can get the ball the first grab rather than fumbling it 3 times - then we have a player.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338438Post Teflon »

Munga wrote:I'll sound like GT here, but ruckman are a waste of time if they can't ruck!
THATS the dilemma I was praying we could avoid..........but McEvoy cant ruck..its frightening, I hate it but its becoming clear..........we just cant get first hands tof the ball.

Sadly, hes great round the ground......


“Yeah….nah””
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338446Post SainterK »

Teflon wrote:
Munga wrote:I'll sound like GT here, but ruckman are a waste of time if they can't ruck!
THATS the dilemma I was praying we could avoid..........but McEvoy cant ruck..its frightening, I hate it but its becoming clear..........we just cant get first hands tof the ball.

Sadly, hes great round the ground......
If they are going to persist with 2 rucks, why isn't he played forward and hickey in the ruck?


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9040
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 351 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338449Post perfectionist »

SainterK wrote:...If they are going to persist with 2 rucks, why isn't he played forward and hickey in the ruck?
They did that, but Ben was hopeless on the rebound. Ben's best work is reading the play in the back half. Alas, you can't sub defence for offence whilst the ball is in play.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23232
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 739 times
Been thanked: 1791 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338452Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:
Teflon wrote:
Munga wrote:I'll sound like GT here, but ruckman are a waste of time if they can't ruck!
THATS the dilemma I was praying we could avoid..........but McEvoy cant ruck..its frightening, I hate it but its becoming clear..........we just cant get first hands tof the ball.

Sadly, hes great round the ground......
If they are going to persist with 2 rucks, why isn't he played forward and hickey in the ruck?
That MOVES the problem it doesnt fix it.

The question is: Can you carry a ruckman who cant win a tap out to advantage?????????????????????????

Around the ground is one thing...........the game starts in the middle and how often do we see one quick out of their and an opposition goal??

tough question this given his age.


“Yeah….nah””
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338459Post SainterK »

Doesn't he lead the comp for contested marks?

Why not in the F50?


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338464Post saintspremiers »

Over to you again barks4eva.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Post Reply