Savage
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Savage
Surely he cannot come in purely because this weeks game is in NZ?
His first 4 AFL matches in Saints colours have been nothing short of terrible. Has really shown nothing to suggest he is anywhere near the player we hoped he'd be. Thankfully getting Dunstan from the Hawks pick has evened out that trade, because Savage looks a big miss.
Templeton looks like he needs a rest (yet in terms of marketing, his image would be great to catch the NZ crowd's attention perhaps offsetting the Savage connection), CJ is on shakey ground, but with Wellar from all accounts tearing the VFL up, and Fisher one step closer, as well as Shenton, Simpkin performing consistently, and Acres being a real wild card, it'd be a very poor message from the selection committee to include Save after what was reportedly nothing more than an average game in the VFL.
Bring back memories of the Saad selection v Lions last year after the drug issue broke, which from all accounts added to the players' disillusionment with Watters. Tokenism. I'm trusting AR won't fall in a similar trap.
His first 4 AFL matches in Saints colours have been nothing short of terrible. Has really shown nothing to suggest he is anywhere near the player we hoped he'd be. Thankfully getting Dunstan from the Hawks pick has evened out that trade, because Savage looks a big miss.
Templeton looks like he needs a rest (yet in terms of marketing, his image would be great to catch the NZ crowd's attention perhaps offsetting the Savage connection), CJ is on shakey ground, but with Wellar from all accounts tearing the VFL up, and Fisher one step closer, as well as Shenton, Simpkin performing consistently, and Acres being a real wild card, it'd be a very poor message from the selection committee to include Save after what was reportedly nothing more than an average game in the VFL.
Bring back memories of the Saad selection v Lions last year after the drug issue broke, which from all accounts added to the players' disillusionment with Watters. Tokenism. I'm trusting AR won't fall in a similar trap.
Re: Savage
Totally agree. Selecting a guy because he was born in the country would be plain stupid. he did play well last week in the 2's but he had 4 chances to show something and didnt. he needs 2 or 3 games in the 2's. having said that Eli will probably be rested but maybe Milera comes in for him as he has done well in the 3 seconds games. Ross should get another chance. he only played about 20 minutes last week. Cant see chips playing. Think there will be one change and i would be disappointed if it was Savage.
Re: Savage
Savage won't come in because he is a kiwi. Richo doesn't roll that way. He may be an emergency and get used for media however. I reckon they may take a couple of our kiwis for the PR opportunity.
Reckon with Armo's injury Seb will get at least another week to show something and deservedly so.
Reckon with Armo's injury Seb will get at least another week to show something and deservedly so.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Savage
Fair calls.PJ wrote:Savage won't come in because he is a kiwi. Richo doesn't roll that way. He may be an emergency and get used for media however. I reckon they may take a couple of our kiwis for the PR opportunity.
Reckon with Armo's injury Seb will get at least another week to show something and deservedly so.
Only possible change I could envisage is giving Templeton a rest and bringing in Savage or Milera. Milera would probably kick a few v Lions and has been consistent in VFL.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12919
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 533 times
- Been thanked: 1818 times
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5454
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
- Contact:
Re: Savage
We already had Webster, didn't we? Pretty sure he played last season.plugger66 wrote:The Fireman wrote:what did we get for McEvoy again ?
Billings and Webster.
Re: Savage
Life Long Saint wrote:We already had Webster, didn't we? Pretty sure he played last season.plugger66 wrote:The Fireman wrote:what did we get for McEvoy again ?
Billings and Webster.
Did he? I didnt see us play last year. i thought we got Webster and Lee for Ben.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5454
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
- Contact:
Re: Savage
I seriously can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse.plugger66 wrote:Life Long Saint wrote:We already had Webster, didn't we? Pretty sure he played last season.plugger66 wrote:
Billings and Webster.
Did he? I didnt see us play last year. i thought we got Webster and Lee for Ben.
Re: Savage
Life Long Saint wrote:I seriously can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse.plugger66 wrote:Life Long Saint wrote:
We already had Webster, didn't we? Pretty sure he played last season.
Did he? I didnt see us play last year. i thought we got Webster and Lee for Ben.
Seriously? Firey was making a joke of how many times people have asked who we got for Ben. Why are people so serious on here. have some fun. The doctors keep saying you live longer by laughing.
You may not think I understand the game but surely you would know I have a pretty good handle on when we recruit players.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5454
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
- Contact:
Re: Savage
Yeah...Seriously...Not all of us read every post on every thread...plugger66 wrote:Seriously? Firey was making a joke of how many times people have asked who we got for Ben. Why are people so serious on here. have some fun. The doctors keep saying you live longer by laughing.
You may not think I understand the game but surely you would know I have a pretty good handle on when we recruit players.
And never underestimate the importance of a well placed emoticon to convey sarcasm.
Re: Savage
Life Long Saint wrote:Yeah...Seriously...Not all of us read every post on every thread...plugger66 wrote:Seriously? Firey was making a joke of how many times people have asked who we got for Ben. Why are people so serious on here. have some fun. The doctors keep saying you live longer by laughing.
You may not think I understand the game but surely you would know I have a pretty good handle on when we recruit players.
And never underestimate the importance of a well placed emoticon to convey sarcasm.
I quote but use emoticons. Leave it up to others to decide what is crap and what isnt. Most of mine is crap. By the way emoticons with the rolling eyes really give me the s***s. reckon they are rude and when they are multiple they are very rude. Most of the others are fine IMO but choose not to use them.
Interested in what you think about savage this week because apart from not agreeing with things you say off the footy field I rate your opionion about the game. No sarcasm there by the way.
Re: Savage
Old Mate wrote:With Schneider suspended will play IMO.
Yep. The previous stuff written is probably null and void now.
Re: Savage
maverick wrote:Why?plugger66 wrote:Cant see chips playing.
Surely if he's not fit enough, someone of his ilk should not spend too much time in the 2's
Because 2nd up on a 6 day break isnt ideal IMO. They will obviously know how he has pulled up better than me but its just my opinion on the 2nd up rule. And surely if he is not fit enough he should spend time in the seconds. I dont get what you are saying there.
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Savage
I think the marketing value of playing a countryman that has zip profile or established star qualities is significantly over estimated. Just can't think how Savage could be used in the NZ media build up to the game.
Re: Savage
Unless like for like injury I reckon they'll give him the extra week with making minimal changes to a winning team in mind.maverick wrote:Why?plugger66 wrote:Cant see chips playing.
Surely if he's not fit enough, someone of his ilk should not spend too much time in the 2's
- HitTheBoundary
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri 27 Feb 2009 9:00am
- Location: Walkabout
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
- Contact:
Re: Savage
plugger66 wrote:By the way emoticons with the rolling eyes really give me the s***s. reckon they are rude and when they are multiple they are very rude.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Re: Savage
HitTheBoundary wrote:plugger66 wrote:By the way emoticons with the rolling eyes really give me the s***s. reckon they are rude and when they are multiple they are very rude.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You very very very very very very very very very very very rude man.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: Savage
I meant not fit enough for the 1's, obviously a big step up…plugger66 wrote:maverick wrote:Why?plugger66 wrote:Cant see chips playing.
Surely if he's not fit enough, someone of his ilk should not spend too much time in the 2's
Because 2nd up on a 6 day break isnt ideal IMO. They will obviously know how he has pulled up better than me but its just my opinion on the 2nd up rule. And surely if he is not fit enough he should spend time in the seconds. I dont get what you are saying there.
6 day break yeah maybe, but I would like to see him get a game or two before the Hawks and co coming up...
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5454
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
- Contact:
Re: Savage
I watched the VFL and this week and whilst Savage's game was fair it wasn't a stand out and I'd rather see Weller promoted. His game was outstanding. Not only in his ball winning ability but also his leadership on the field. Shenton's was very good too but with Fisher coming back the need for another defender isn't there yet. Loved what I saw from Acres too. That boy has some promise.plugger66 wrote:Interested in what you think about savage this week because apart from not agreeing with things you say off the footy field I rate your opionion about the game. No sarcasm there by the way.