Controversial decisons

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3493 times
Been thanked: 2763 times

Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637853Post skeptic »

If anyone has a free moment... I'm trying to think of controversial decisions the club has made over the last 16 years. A few that come to mind:
- Lovett
- Cousins
- Leaving Moorabbin, coming back
- Rotating captains
- Many things Ross Lyon, Thomas, Blight

If anyone can think of any more, i'll reveal why in a few days


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1151 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637854Post Devilhead »

Leaving out Maxy in 09
Col Captains
Playing Ball injured
Sacking Blight


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637856Post supersaints »

Starting Tassie games ...then leaving them to Hawthorn


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637857Post supersaints »

I guess we couod in ode the New Zealand games


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637858Post Stephen Theodore »

Stewart for Barrot


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637862Post bigcarl »

GT sacking was the biggest and arguably cost us a premiership ... or several. Not that I could be bothered arguing that old chestnut again.

Controversial it certainly was though. Brought down the Buttress administration and ushered in Footy First.

On field it meant a conservative, defensive game and more adventurous and attacking sides such as Geelong, Hawthorn and even Collingwood reaped the rewards.

We stopped developing youth, went for role-players and experienced spuds.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637869Post BigMart »

GT going on as coach after interim

Cousins non selection

Lovett even contemplating that

Letting go of Ball, Clarke, Maguire for Lovett, Smith and Will Johnson

Tasmania!!!

Seaford!!!!


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5454
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 470 times
Contact:

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637871Post Life Long Saint »

Not sure why the Cousins non-selection is controversial.
Thought it was a smart thing to do.

Letting Ball go and trading Lovett in was awful. We lost a genuine leader and gained a basket case.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637874Post Impatient Sainter »

Saints administration and management through 70's until current team.
Selling VFL park.
Giving up Tasmanian contract - GT's influence.
Allowing GT to manage players contracts.
Employing Archie Fraser then Nettelfold.
Leaving Moorabbin - worst decision ever.
Being forced into Etihad diabolical $$$ contract.
Choice of coaches?
Saints lack of quality conditioning, development and recruitment staff during critical years.
Having RL undergo Luke Ball trade negotiations - ridiculous.
Not having a stand alone VFL team hurts.
Clubs inability to maintain and grow membership numbers in line with other Vic clubs.


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637875Post St Chris »

As controversial as GT's sacking was, surely GT's appointment was just as controversial????

Was the Yellow peril in the last 16 years?? (just checked, yes it was.....)


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637876Post BigMart »

Cousins - smart thing to do?

Don't want to get into a debate about it... But we lost the next 2 GFs by 9 and 0 points. We had a free shot at a 29yo 4 times B&F Brownlow medallist, premiership player, and ex captain for almost zero

He may have delisted after 3 weeks... Or played instead of Rob Eddy in the GF?

Instead the following year we chose an underperforming, lazy, drunk arse moron with a bad attitude. Fora million bucks and Pick 16.

I'd say we took the wrong risk.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9357
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 634 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637877Post thejiggingsaint »

Starting a thread like this one? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637880Post BigMart »

The stand alone VFL club thing is a complete non issue. The relationship between the two clubs is important though.

We'd have been absolutely non competitive in the VFL if we stood alone, and a non competitive environment is never good for development.

We've been somewhat competitive due to the non listed players who perform week in week out
Harrison and Cockie over the years have been sensational in the VFL winning 7 B&Fs between them as bull midfielders


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5454
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 470 times
Contact:

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637884Post Life Long Saint »

BigMart wrote:Cousins - smart thing to do?

Don't want to get into a debate about it... But we lost the next 2 GFs by 9 and 0 points. We had a free shot at a 29yo 4 times B&F Brownlow medallist, premiership player, and ex captain for almost zero

He may have delisted after 3 weeks... Or played instead of Rob Eddy in the GF?

Instead the following year we chose an underperforming, lazy, drunk arse moron with a bad attitude. Fora million bucks and Pick 16.

I'd say we took the wrong risk.
We won 20/22 in 2009.
Don't think Cousins would have added much there. Would he have taken the kicks that Milne and Schneider missed? Don't think so. Injury probably would have prevented him having much of an impact anyway.
We were in trouble in 2010 GF but the team willed itself back into the game in the 3rd quarter - without Cousins...Would he have made the ball bounce into the arms of Milne instead of away from it?
He played two underwhelming season for the Tigers and was only playing 50% game time by the end of 2010...Not sure he would have added any real value in those GF's. Not even sure he had the fitness level required for Lyon's game plan anyway. Every likelihood that he was still partying too hard off field. Who knows what sort of influence he may have had on some of the young players.

And, for the record, he was born 30/06/1978, so we would have been 30 when drafted and 32 by the time 2010 GF was played.
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/ ... usins.html


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3493 times
Been thanked: 2763 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637890Post skeptic »

Life Long Saint wrote:
BigMart wrote:Cousins - smart thing to do?

Don't want to get into a debate about it... But we lost the next 2 GFs by 9 and 0 points. We had a free shot at a 29yo 4 times B&F Brownlow medallist, premiership player, and ex captain for almost zero

He may have delisted after 3 weeks... Or played instead of Rob Eddy in the GF?

Instead the following year we chose an underperforming, lazy, drunk arse moron with a bad attitude. Fora million bucks and Pick 16.

I'd say we took the wrong risk.
We won 20/22 in 2009.
Don't think Cousins would have added much there. Would he have taken the kicks that Milne and Schneider missed? Don't think so. Injury probably would have prevented him having much of an impact anyway.
We were in trouble in 2010 GF but the team willed itself back into the game in the 3rd quarter - without Cousins...Would he have made the ball bounce into the arms of Milne instead of away from it?
He played two underwhelming season for the Tigers and was only playing 50% game time by the end of 2010...Not sure he would have added any real value in those GF's. Not even sure he had the fitness level required for Lyon's game plan anyway. Every likelihood that he was still partying too hard off field. Who knows what sort of influence he may have had on some of the young players.

And, for the record, he was born 30/06/1978, so we would have been 30 when drafted and 32 by the time 2010 GF was played.
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/players/ ... usins.html
I think the debate alone proves that it was a controversial decision... And therefore makes the list.

Thanks guys, keep them coming


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637903Post BigMart »

Probably better to state what actually happened compared to what probably would have happened?

And I would have taken a mediocre season (20ppg of quality) from an experienced champion as compared to one of our well documented weak bottom 6.

If we talk probables ... Chances are Ben (the second best gut runner in the history of the game) might have lit it up in the last quarter on the big stage.

If we talk actual
He finished top 5 in Richmonds B&F and added to their team from a leadership POV. Was not an issue off field.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5454
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 470 times
Contact:

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637905Post Life Long Saint »

BigMart wrote:Probably better to state what actually happened compared to what probably would have happened?

And I would have taken a mediocre season (20ppg of quality) from an experienced champion as compared to one of our well documented weak bottom 6.

If we talk probables ... Chances are Ben (the second best gut runner in the history of the game) might have lit it up in the last quarter on the big stage.

If we talk actual
He finished top 5 in Richmonds B&F and added to their team from a leadership POV. Was not an issue off field.
Says more about Richmond than St Kilda.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637909Post saintsRrising »

Voting in Footy First and Wasteaway - They sounded good, but delivered little


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637937Post Impatient Sainter »

BigMart wrote:The stand alone VFL club thing is a complete non issue. The relationship between the two clubs is important though.

We'd have been absolutely non competitive in the VFL if we stood alone, and a non competitive environment is never good for development.

We've been somewhat competitive due to the non listed players who perform week in week out
Harrison and Cockie over the years have been sensational in the VFL winning 7 B&Fs between them as bull midfielders
We wouldnt be discussing this if the club had the finances to run their own VFL side - Sandi would have struggled to remain viable in the VFL and we would have taken on all there top up players. It only suits both clubs because the Saints are the AFL porpers!


Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637940Post Playon »

St Chris wrote:As controversial as GT's sacking was, surely GT's appointment was just as controversial????
Giving Corn Flakes a list that Ray Charles could of coached


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12919
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 533 times
Been thanked: 1818 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637943Post The Fireman »

Not visiting Geoff Cunningham when he was in hospital for a couple of weeks


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637947Post Scollop »

Toss Lyon left Ball on the bench in the last quarter of a grand final to prove a point. Luke was influential in the first 3 quarters and ...he wasn't injured. If risking a loss in a grand final and being stubborn enough to leave one of your best players on the bench all quarter isn't one of the most contreversial I don't know what is.

The stubborness and controversy didn't end there. The coach was backed up by the kool-aid loving board and managed to not only lose Ball as a player but refused to trade with Collingwood thereby losing any chance of receiving any compensation or any worthwhile draft picks.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/l ... 5840032507


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637948Post saintsRrising »

Resting the players from training and instead sending them to see "The Day After Tomorrow".


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637957Post BigMart »

Scallop

That was hideous by Lyon!

Not only did it hurt our chances 09/10.. It cost a player who could be helping us now!!


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4517
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: Controversial decisons

Post: # 1637959Post whiskers3614 »

BigMart wrote:Scallop

That was hideous by Lyon!

Not only did it hurt our chances 09/10.. It cost a player who could be helping us now!!
And yet the Lyon-worship persists!


Post Reply