Huggins+ Stonecold ban

[WellardSaint]

banning for ongoing dispute?
Would be better to move their posts to AE for the time being.

Why does a mod have to trawl thru their stuff to see other 'breaches'?
He should only look if someone reports a post.

A council ranger won't drive around listening for barking dogs; they respond to complaints only.
This smacks of complete over-reaction

[Sainter_Dad]

banning for ongoing dispute?
Would be better to move their posts to AE for the time being.

Why does a mod have to trawl thru their stuff to see other 'breaches'?
He should only look if someone reports a post.

A council ranger won't drive around listening for barking dogs; they respond to complaints only.
This smacks of complete over-reaction

I disagree - I get frustrated by the hi-jacking of threads for personal tit-for-tat

Needing to trawl through pages of bickering for a few snippets of information does not make for good reading.

I would agree that if they wanted to avoid a ban - they could start a separate thread - call it a verbal sparring match, quote the post they want to fight about and go for it - that way we do not need to get involved - it is not like we are all going to take sides.

[dragit]

You should picket HQ.

[samuraisaint]

I don't have a problem with a bit of banter. Bit like the footy actually.

[BackFromUSA]

You can read the ‘banter’ in the Animal Enclosure.

This went beyond banter.

Posts had multiple rule breaches for both of them and their ongoing dispute had taken over multiple threads in the forum stifling discussion and had escalated to a point where it could no longer be tolerated by the majority of readers.

On a side note it is actual work to move these posts to another forum. Not a fun a Sunday night activity!

[saintspremiers]

You can read the ‘banter’ in the Animal Enclosure.

This went beyond banter.

Posts had multiple rule breaches for both of them and their ongoing dispute had taken over multiple threads in the forum stifling discussion and had escalated to a point where it could no longer be tolerated by the majority of readers.

On a side note it is actual work to move these posts to another forum. Not a fun a Sunday night activity!

No one much uses the AE

Did Huggins at least get a warning or two before the ban?

He adds a lot to the forum, but sadly got sucked in by that forum troll stonecold. Yes it takes two to tango, but stoney has a track record doesn’t he Simon??

[Joffa Burns]

Sorry to see them both go, I enjoy reading their input.
Hopefully they return when their ban is complete!!!!!

[The Fireman]

Sorry to see them both go, I enjoy reading their input.
Hopefully they return when their ban is complete!!!!!

+1

[satchmo]

You can read the ‘banter’ in the Animal Enclosure.

This went beyond banter.

Posts had multiple rule breaches for both of them and their ongoing dispute had taken over multiple threads in the forum stifling discussion and had escalated to a point where it could no longer be tolerated by the majority of readers.

On a side note it is actual work to move these posts to another forum. Not a fun a Sunday night activity!

No one much uses the AE

Did Huggins at least get a warning or two before the ban?

He adds a lot to the forum, but sadly got sucked in by that forum troll stonecold. Yes it takes two to tango, but stoney has a track record doesn’t he Simon??

As does DH, and of course, your good self.

[SaintPav]

You should picket HQ.

He thinks that's a former football player.

No hope.

[SaintPav]

Sorry to see them both go, I enjoy reading their input.
Hopefully they return when their ban is complete!!!!!

+1

+2

[Stephen Theodore]

Sorry to see them both go, I enjoy reading their input.
Hopefully they return when their ban is complete!!!!!

+1

+2

+3

[saint64]

You can read the ‘banter’ in the Animal Enclosure.

This went beyond banter.

Posts had multiple rule breaches for both of them and their ongoing dispute had taken over multiple threads in the forum stifling discussion and had escalated to a point where it could no longer be tolerated by the majority of readers.

On a side note it is actual work to move these posts to another forum. Not a fun a Sunday night activity!

No one much uses the AE

Did Huggins at least get a warning or two before the ban?

He adds a lot to the forum, but sadly got sucked in by that forum troll stonecold. Yes it takes two to tango, but stoney has a track record doesn’t he Simon??

+1

[Scollop]

Sorry to see them both go, I enjoy reading their input.
Hopefully they return when their ban is complete!!!!!

+1

+2

+3

- 1/2 (half)

[barneyboyz]

I get the feeling some new names are a coming soon!


Again

[loris]

I get the feeling some new names are a coming soon!


Again

True...... but the modus operandi of posting style always reverts to type

[barneyboyz]

I get the feeling some new names are a coming soon!


Again

True...... but the modus operandi of posting style always reverts to type

[David-Lee]

Brilliant! Now everyone will salivate as they suckle on my wisdom...let the ingenious posting begin!

[spert]

Sorry to see GT get banned

[parkeysainter]

Sorry to see GT get banned

Who is GT?

Mr Huggins will come up with a new name and avatar in no time.

[saint64]

Huggins is welcome back under whatever name he chooses. At least he adds value to the forum (unlike Stonecold).

[takeaway]

Huggins is welcome back under whatever name he chooses. At least he adds value to the forum (unlike Stonecold).

Depends on your definition of "value". Obviously different from mine.

[parkeysainter]

Wonder what his next pseudo name will be?

[asiu]

there is no way Stonemotherlesscold is GT

blowme said so !!!

[asiu]

sorry

new at this game

COZ blowme said so !!!!!!