Parker vs Long

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815376Post fugazi »

Who has more upside?

I notice Long had 4 disposals and 1 goal 2 inside 50s and 92 meters gained

Vs

Parker 11 disposals, 1 goal, 4 inside 50s and 392 meters gained

and yet Long retains his spot and Parker is dropped.

Neither have stood out this year, but for me, Parker had had the better year and given he is new to AFL, has done better and has more upside. Another preseason and he could be a really good medium tall, quick pressure forward.


Nee!
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6531
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1207 times
Been thanked: 447 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815379Post Jacks Back »

Parker is so overrated on here. He is a park footballer that gives away free kicks left, right and centre. long is not much chop either though but seems to have a bit of x-factor.

Young will be gone I would think.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Rubyjo
Club Player
Posts: 1156
Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
Has thanked: 197 times
Been thanked: 292 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815384Post Rubyjo »

Parker has never played afl until this year.. Give him time he has so much potential. How long did we give billings like 5 years.. Relax


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8999
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815415Post spert »

Both could be much better players, they have the skills but the work is between the ears. Need the coach (Ratts or whoever) to get them in the right frame of mind- I reckon Clarkson would really get them up and about.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815416Post kosifantutti »

Rubyjo wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:12pm Parker has never played afl until this year.. Give him time he has so much potential. How long did we give billings like 5 years.. Relax
You don’t give a 23 year old five years to prove themselves.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815420Post skeptic »

At the moment it’s a form thing

Gotta remember that the forward pocket role is one of the hardest in AFL. Both have played good games and stinkers.

At the moment I like Parker more because he has more weapons though isn’t as naturally skilled.

He has to close the gap btw his best and worst.

Long clearly has more talent and X-Factor... but he tends to be really undisciplined and often unsighted in games. I wonder about workrate off-field and if it’s everything it could be

Either way, both stay on the list for another year and both have a lot to to... but both also have a lot of talent


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815421Post saintsRrising »

Both have a a lot of talent and physical gifts, BUT both do not really know what to to do as AFL players.

There is too much see ball- get ball going on. Attacking flair is good, but AFL is also very much a team game and in team play they are not so good.

I was hoping that Long had turned the corner against the Dees and he played a good disciplined but still offensive game. But then against the Crows he went MIA again.

Parker's field kicking lets him down as well.

Parker is new to the AFL system though. However he did not really seem to develop as a player over the year.

Both are certainly worth keeping, but both could also easily end up on the scrap pile at the end of next season.

Parker is older, but has been in the AFL system less than a year, and before that has had little experience at good standard clubs. So hopefully another pre-season and coaching will help him a lot.

They will have Ratts or a new coach in charge next season. Let us hope that it is a break out year for both.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10934
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3375 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815422Post Scollop »

Unlike a few of our other players these guys stick their tackles. Both are hard at it and you know you've been bumped if they are within range.

Having the ability to hurt someone is a weapon that is easily as good as kicking 1-2 goals for your team (like Ben Long did to Levi Casboult when we played Carlton and he got reported for what loooked like a high hit...but it wasn't). Casboult felt like he was in a car crash and may have suffered concussion and definitely looked like he got whiplash

I think we have to encourage this sort of skill and both have the speed to hurt. It's like old fashion footy. It weakens your opposition and in some cases if you eliminate a good player's impact you are half way to getting your team over the line.

I wouldn't be looking at just one game of footy to evalutae who has more upside. I reckon Ben is a better set shot at goal and Long is also more creative imo and most importantly - is a better field kick. If they are competing for exactly the same position, I'd have Ben in front. If Ben or Mat were left footed, I'd have them both in front of Lonie


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18647
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1900 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815423Post SaintPav »

Long is in my best 22 and starts in next years forward line of:

Gresham Bruce Long

Lonie King Billings

Delicious!

😋


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815424Post saintsRrising »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 12:20pm Long is in my best 22 and starts in next years forward line of:

Gresham Bruce Long

Lonie King Billings

Delicious!

😋
No Membrey? Surely you jest.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18647
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1900 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815426Post SaintPav »

saintsRrising wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 12:24pm
SaintPav wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 12:20pm Long is in my best 22 and starts in next years forward line of:

Gresham Bruce Long

Lonie King Billings

Delicious!

😋
No Membrey? Surely you jest.
My bad...

Gresham Bruce Long

Lonie King Membrey


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11483
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2499 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815435Post B.M »

Long is better than Parker... but not by much. Neither have kicked a bag yet.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22736
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8644 times
Been thanked: 3788 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815436Post saynta »

B.M wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 1:34pm Long is better than Parker... but not by much. Neither have kicked a bag yet.
Long certainly has more talent. Parker more desire.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815441Post Ghost Like »

Jacks Back wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:05pm Parker is so overrated on here. He is a park footballer that gives away free kicks left, right and centre. long is not much chop either though but seems to have a bit of x-factor.

Young will be gone I would think.
Warner was a park cricketer

Kelly a park footballer

Glad we took a chance, I have hope for Parker, especially if we acquire Hill. Long still needs work but worth persevering with. Agree about Young but like to see all given another AFL pre season & opportunity.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11227
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815442Post Bernard Shakey »

Parker goes for everything, even when he shouldn't. The number of times he spoils teammates, especially Bruce is infuriating!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815444Post shanegrambeau »

I wonder if us fans influenced the selection of Parker, who played in my (esteemed) opinion at least four more games than his form has warranted. Surely they don’t just pick ‘fan favorites’ do they? Especially at the beginning of the year. I don’t accept that we give people ‘time to improve’ in the firsts when premiership points are for sale, when proven players languish in the seconds and we compromise our capacity game day.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13520
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815447Post The_Dud »

Both might make it, but I think Long has the bigger upside.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815448Post skeptic »

saynta wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 1:36pm
B.M wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 1:34pm Long is better than Parker... but not by much. Neither have kicked a bag yet.
Long certainly has more talent. Parker more desire.
Bang.

I think that’s the crux of the issue at the moment


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11483
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2499 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815454Post B.M »

Long goes pretty damn hard, not sure that’s his issue. Consistency is though.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22736
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8644 times
Been thanked: 3788 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815462Post saynta »

B.M wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 2:56pm Long goes pretty damn hard, not sure that’s his issue. Consistency is though.
Some of the time. Went missing after quarter time klast week.

Very disappointing actually.

Lucky to be playing tomorrow.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815471Post Ghost Like »

shanegrambeau wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 2:12pm I wonder if us fans influenced the selection of Parker, who played in my (esteemed) opinion at least four more games than his form has warranted. Surely they don’t just pick ‘fan favorites’ do they? Especially at the beginning of the year. I don’t accept that we give people ‘time to improve’ in the firsts when premiership points are for sale, when proven players languish in the seconds and we compromise our capacity game day.
Jeez, if they did that, explain Newnes run of games?

The next question has to be who are the proven players left to languish?

I do believe when we've kids with talent we play them in the firsts. It is working for Paton, Clark, Coffield and Marshall. It will work for Clavarino and would have worked for White. We embraced mediocrity & were left with a core of senior players that have hit a ceiling.

Dare to dream I say.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11483
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2499 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815474Post B.M »

Hardest position on the ground to play nowadays. You play fwd of the footy, yet rarely get the ball directed through you, and you first job is to trap the ball i50 and provide pressure.
Sometimes given a job to shut down defender.

Especially hard to be consistent.

12ppg a goal and 3 tackles is a serviceable game, any numbers better than that usually signify a good game


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22736
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8644 times
Been thanked: 3788 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815481Post saynta »

Both have a habit of getting in the way of our key forwards.

It was Long's hip that caused Paddy's latest concussion.


User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815486Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

They both have the hardest role in modern day footy. We have to remember that. The coaches do too.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Parker vs Long

Post: # 1815489Post Ghost Like »

saynta wrote: Sat 10 Aug 2019 6:12pm Both have a habit of getting in the way of our key forwards.

It was Long's hip that caused Paddy's latest concussion.
Said it before, will say it again. Not convinced of that, I believe the young female trainer popped the lid off the water bottle a little too close to Paddy.

Yes, Long & Parker need to learn when to contest & when not to. End of the day, would rather a contest than not one.


Post Reply