Collingwood?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297622Post matrix »

a 13 year old nuffy by the sounds of it
but that could prob get you and in trouble


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297624Post SaintPav »

dragit wrote:
SaintPav wrote:BTW, I really like your avatar. You're either 13 or a moron.
How did you guess, I am both a 13 year old moron.

I won't ridicule you pav, you make a fool of yourself well enough on your own.

Why don't you tell us all how we should post a bit more, that's good fun.
That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.

I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297625Post SaintPav »

dragit wrote:
matrix wrote:maybe he likes waffles????
correct… was a reference to Scotty Watters favourites…

What sort of picture would you prefer pav?
It will do. Touched a nerve have I.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297627Post SainterK »

Haven't you seen the holopraphic image when you stare at his avy...


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297628Post dragit »

SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.

I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
What don't you hear?

Take what? being called a moron?

You're really starting to babble… might be time for a nap.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297629Post matrix »

ok im confused

how could you not read posts apart from the ones that are over the top?
you would have to read all the posts to determine what ones are over the top

anyhoo back to the important stuff

hmmmm
waffles.......


Sainterman
Club Player
Posts: 1497
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297630Post Sainterman »

Boring!

Get a room you 2!


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297631Post dragit »

Sainterman wrote:Boring!

Get a room you 2!
apologies sorry.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297632Post SaintPav »

dragit wrote:
SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.

I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
What don't you hear?

Take what? being called a moron?

You're really starting to babble… might be time for a nap.
only if you go and eat a waffle.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297691Post sunsaint »

SainterK wrote:Yes and no...

We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?

The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whinging
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times


Seeya
*************
Sainterman
Club Player
Posts: 1497
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297694Post Sainterman »

sunsaint wrote:
SainterK wrote:Yes and no...

We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?

The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whinging
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
I can't find anything to say Armstrong tested positive...did find this which seems to suggest he didn't....

http://news.yahoo.com/did-lance-armstro ... 38095.html


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297708Post Old Mate »

That's cos Armstrong never tested positive to a banned substance.


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297710Post saintbrat »

nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series :|


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
ozrulestrace
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2358
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
Location: East of Bentleigh

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297711Post ozrulestrace »

saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series :|
Say what?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297712Post Con Gorozidis »

sunsaint wrote:
SainterK wrote:Yes and no...

We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?

The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whinging
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
people pick and choose to satisfy their bias

'oh lance never tested positive so hes innocent'
'oh chinese 16yo with faster time than michael phelps didnt test positive but we all know she cheated'


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297713Post Old Mate »

ozrulestrace wrote:
saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series :|
Say what?

U wot m8?


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297716Post saintbrat »

Old Mate wrote:
ozrulestrace wrote:
saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series :|
Say what?

U wot m8?
Collingwood are partners with the Holden Racing team - cars have to carry their logo-- check side window of the car
http://www.news.com.au/sport/motor-spor ... 6575541048


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
User avatar
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297812Post barks4eva »

We're Collingwood players on the juice in 2010 ?

Is the pope catholic?

The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance

You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL

Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted

And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing

They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL

The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership

You know it makes sense

St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice


DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297823Post Con Gorozidis »

barks4eva
im on your side on this.
people can call me a sore loser or a conspiracy theorist all day long.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297825Post matrix »

+2


User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297839Post Iceman234 »

barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance

You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL

Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted

St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
plus another.


Image
User avatar
saint75
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2101
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 2:05pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297841Post saint75 »

Iceman234 wrote:
barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance

You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL

Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted

St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
plus another.
Can we have a link to this statement? I know there were a couple of journos on the case, but I never saw an AFL statement.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297842Post Iceman234 »

not sure s75 cos I'm not that clever but wait for it re Swan...


Image
User avatar
saint75
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2101
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 2:05pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297843Post saint75 »

barks4eva wrote:We're Collingwood players on the juice in 2010 ?

Is the pope catholic?

The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance

You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL

Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted

And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing

They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL

The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership

You know it makes sense

St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
Can' believe I agree with you re-Collingwood. Don't agree with your comments about the board though.

However, in light of recent events, I would like to add the 2009 Premiers to that also.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Collingwood?

Post: # 1297848Post Con Gorozidis »

matrix wrote:a 13 year old nuffy by the sounds of it
but that could prob get you and in trouble
i know its probably not politically correct but use of the word 'nuffy' always makes me laugh without fail.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Post Reply