Saints at the Brownlow

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393756Post 8856brother »

Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts

It must also be said that if you get 47 possies, including 34 kicks, 12 marks and 2 goals in a strong win and don't get 3 brownlow votes, you should consider yourself unlucky. I suppose one of either Monty or Jack had to get 2 votes in the Freo game.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393789Post joffaboy »

8856brother wrote:Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts

It must also be said that if you get 47 possies, including 34 kicks, 12 marks and 2 goals in a strong win and don't get 3 brownlow votes, you should consider yourself unlucky. I suppose one of either Monty or Jack had to get 2 votes in the Freo game.

He is not a midfielder, so the umpires dont see him.


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393791Post Old Mate »

Con Gorozidis wrote: p.s Anyone else find Bruce just nqr? Always makes me squirm a little.
<edit by mods>


felix
Club Player
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2011 3:29pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393793Post felix »

3 votes = footy player partners.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23122
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 727 times
Been thanked: 1754 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393795Post Teflon »

Did Scott and Pelchens sit at same table.....


“Yeah….nah””
terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2511
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 169 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393796Post terry smith rules »

8856brother wrote:Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts
What makes this worse is that the 3 votes went to Ted Richards who had to be moved off him at half time.

In an era of sports betting fraud, something like this needs to be more accountable


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393797Post Sobraz »

Jack dipped his toe in the water this year....

He'll be wearing the medal around his neck 2015 or 2016...


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393798Post dragit »

terry smith rules wrote:
8856brother wrote:Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts
What makes this worse is that the 3 votes went to Ted Richards who had to be moved off him at half time.

In an era of sports betting fraud, something like this needs to be more accountable
Completely outrageous… Riewoldt doubled every single indicator.

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
final siren rating - 153

Richards
16 disposals
7 marks
3 tackles
1 goal
final siren rating - 82

I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393800Post The Redeemer »

How does Tom Lynch kick 10 goals but not get 3 votes? Regardless who he plays agains


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393805Post joffaboy »

The Redeemer wrote:How does Tom Lynch kick 10 goals but not get 3 votes? Regardless who he plays agains

He is not a midfielder. Ineligible for the Brownlow


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393807Post stinger »

Old Mate wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote: p.s Anyone else find Bruce just nqr? Always makes me squirm a little.
Definitely wouldn't leave my kids alone with him
''second that....reckoned sam.....the female presenter ......was 205cm... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393810Post kosifantutti »

terry smith rules wrote:
8856brother wrote:Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts
What makes this worse is that the 3 votes went to Ted Richards who had to be moved off him at half time.

In an era of sports betting fraud, something like this needs to be more accountable
From afl.com.au
Riewoldt was in vintage form. He ran Ted Richards ragged for a half before doing similar to Heath Grundy, and played a game that coach Scott Watters said "just reeked of one of the great captains".


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
sainterjo
Club Player
Posts: 514
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:08am
Location: Anticipation

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393824Post sainterjo »

saintbrat wrote:Image
Every time I see Nick with the magnificent Catherine, I think "oh well done, young man. Your heart is in good hands".


They will not grow old, as those from more northern States grow old.
For them it will always be three-quarter-time, with the scores level
and the wind advantage in the final term.
mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 235 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393846Post mr six o'clock »

sainterjo wrote:
saintbrat wrote:Image
Every time I see Nick with the magnificent Catherine, I think "oh well done, young man. Your heart is in good hands".
And i think a potential champion son will grow up playing some american sport !


In red white and black from 73
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393847Post plugger66 »

joffaboy wrote:
8856brother wrote:Round 5 in NZ

Riewoldt N
27 possies
13 marks
7 tackles
2 goals 1
Clearly best on ground in a tight game in my opinion.
Brownlow votes - Donuts

It must also be said that if you get 47 possies, including 34 kicks, 12 marks and 2 goals in a strong win and don't get 3 brownlow votes, you should consider yourself unlucky. I suppose one of either Monty or Jack had to get 2 votes in the Freo game.

He is not a midfielder, so the umpires dont see him.

In any other weekly voting awards do players apart from mids get votes. Lets face it, it aint only the browmlow that gives votes mainly to mids and also lets be honest mids now win the games for the sides and that why we need more quality mids. Forget the big men. get them with later picks and develop them unless they are so far ahead of any other player.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393934Post sunsaint »

dragit wrote:I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.
never WAS - never HAS been an award for BOG
it is fairest and best - you dont know how many sprays roo gave off that game
one of the reasons why Harvey won two - a great player but never a foul mouth on field


Seeya
*************
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393936Post saintbrat »

sunsaint wrote:
dragit wrote:I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.
never WAS - never HAS been an award for BOG
it is fairest and best - you dont know how many sprays roo gave off that game
one of the reasons why Harvey won two - a great player but never a foul mouth on field

not according to some....


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393937Post sunsaint »

saintbrat wrote:
not according to some....
someone form gellyong?


Seeya
*************
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393939Post plugger66 »

sunsaint wrote:
dragit wrote:I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.
never WAS - never HAS been an award for BOG
it is fairest and best - you dont know how many sprays roo gave off that game
one of the reasons why Harvey won two - a great player but never a foul mouth on field

My question would be if the umpires arent the best who is the best because it seems all the media awards arent the same results either. being an umpire over many years I reckon it is the easiest place to see who is best. What you cant see is the job players do for the team but thats what club B&F are for.


saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393941Post saint66au »

Old Mate wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote: p.s Anyone else find Bruce just nqr? Always makes me squirm a little.
Definitely wouldn't leave my kids alone with him
The class of this Forum truly amazes me sometimes


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393962Post The Redeemer »

saint66au wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote: p.s Anyone else find Bruce just nqr? Always makes me squirm a little.
Definitely wouldn't leave my kids alone with him
The class of this Forum truly amazes me sometimes
He looked a bit off last night however to the extent that he is/was a pedofile is bizarre.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1393996Post dragit »

sunsaint wrote:
dragit wrote:I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.
never WAS - never HAS been an award for BOG
it is fairest and best - you dont know how many sprays roo gave off that game
one of the reasons why Harvey won two - a great player but never a foul mouth on field
You've got to be f****** kidding me sunsaint…

Did you watch the sydney saints game?

Was Richards the best & Fairest player on the ground?

Riewoldt was clearly the best player on the ground, was he unfair to a point which negated his influence on the game?

Who did he spray? Did it mean that his game was worthless…?

If anything McViegh was next best behind Riewoldt… Richards was completely toweled up and moved off the most dominant player on the ground.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1394022Post plugger66 »

dragit wrote:
sunsaint wrote:
dragit wrote:I've said for a long time, the umpires just aren't the best people to be judging who is BOG, they should be too busy concentrating on the contest to even notice who is doing what.
never WAS - never HAS been an award for BOG
it is fairest and best - you dont know how many sprays roo gave off that game
one of the reasons why Harvey won two - a great player but never a foul mouth on field
You've got to be f****** kidding me sunsaint…

Did you watch the sydney saints game?

Was Richards the best & Fairest player on the ground?

Riewoldt was clearly the best player on the ground, was he unfair to a point which negated his influence on the game?

Who did he spray? Did it mean that his game was worthless…?

If anything McViegh was next best behind Riewoldt… Richards was completely toweled up and moved off the most dominant player on the ground.

If the umpires arent the best to vote for the umpires award then who is? Even in the paper and on radio we different best players just about every game and from my experience I have found it easier to vote for players when umpiring.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1394027Post saintspremiers »

Maybe it should be votes out of 10.

Current flawed system gives three times as many votes for BOG than third best


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints at the Brownlow

Post: # 1394040Post dragit »

plugger66 wrote:If the umpires arent the best to vote for the umpires award then who is? Even in the paper and on radio we different best players just about every game and from my experience I have found it easier to vote for players when umpiring.
Maybe they should go and watch the game again on tape before casting votes.

It's the games highest honour so when the umpires make a mistake on voting, it's a bit more important than a wrong free kick. Surely a player giving a spray doesn't negate his dominance on the match?

Did you watch the Sydney game? Was Richards the best & fairest player? He was flogged & had to be moved off Riewoldt. So those votes are clearly wrong.


Post Reply