No GWS for buddy

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saintsrus
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sat 01 Oct 2005 5:10pm
Location: F.K.A. saintsforlife
Been thanked: 3 times

No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396719Post saintsrus »

Tweeting they have withdrawn offer, look swans bound per sen


Before Im 85
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7252
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396724Post chook23 »

That extra cap again


saint4life
saintsrus
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sat 01 Oct 2005 5:10pm
Location: F.K.A. saintsforlife
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396725Post saintsrus »

We may as well give up if they can afford him, the smaller clubs have no hope


Before Im 85
fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396727Post fingers »

Something not right with all of this.


Kernal75
Club Player
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 16 Nov 2011 2:21pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396728Post Kernal75 »

Being reported on SEN that's it's official, he's a Swan!!


southernsaint
Club Player
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2011 11:17am

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396732Post southernsaint »

Great news, saints will be out of the news as eddie and co scream about the swans extra cap space


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396733Post BigMart »

Maybe if they keep going the swans forward line will look like tis

Franklin..... Cloke............. Goodes

Tippett...... J. Riewoldt....... N.Riewoldt

Off the bench
Hurley and Kennedy???


User avatar
saint75
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2101
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 2:05pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396739Post saint75 »

I am so over bloomin' football!!!! The smaller Victorian clubs (for that matter, most of the Victorian Clubs) no longer stand a chance. After the Essendope scandal and now this, I have just about had enough of football and I am ready to turn my back on it. Imagine an extra 1 million in our cap? We may have kept Goddard, Geelong may have kept Gary and Buddy most likely would not be going anywhere.

This is so wrong on so many levels. How in the heck can they fit both Franklin and Tippett in their cap? Are the other players only being paid $150-$200K a year?


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396740Post matrix »

ok someone with some understanding of the whole free agency saga answer this for me

if hawks match the offer of 1.4 what happens??
they get a FA pick?
they get a trade?
what?


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396742Post White Winmar »

If true, that's a f&$king disgrace. HOw on earth can they afford him? Either their compensatory salary cap is too generous, or they're straight out cheats. Probably both!


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396744Post dragit »

matrix wrote:ok someone with some understanding of the whole free agency saga answer this for me

if hawks match the offer of 1.4 what happens??
they get a FA pick?
they get a trade?
what?
they keep him


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396749Post matrix »

cheers dragit

its as simple as that??
blimey

will be interesting to see what happens there
can they afford another 300 grand?
thats basically a half decent players yearly wage

geez i hope he stays
id rather see the hawks get another two flags instead of shitney clean up with this COLA farce


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5003
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 86 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396756Post maverick »

Lose Mumford $500k a year
Goodes drops $300k in the last year of his contract
Bolton on $300k goes
White who wants $300k a year gets traded for a draft pick.
The AFL will pay some of the money for ambassadorial BS as well...

Probably see McVeigh and O'Keefe drop money for a last premiership too.
Their remaining mids are young and probably not on much coin, kennedy is probably paid the most.

They have a high/low model, interesting....


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396759Post matrix »

theyll just back end his contract until goodes and okeefe retire

as much as we hate it and as much as it is a shite system...the swans have played this quite well

matner gone
white will go
mumford wants out
bolton gone
goodes at the ass end
okeefe at the ass end

back end buddy until they are both gone

the timing has been really really sweet for them, as much as it pains me to say it


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 545 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396787Post remboy »

Wonder how Tommy Walsh if feeling about this?


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
ctqs
Club Player
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue 20 Apr 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396788Post ctqs »

I reckon Hawks fans would understand if he went to GWS. But going to a premiership rival will hurt his legacy. Where's the money coming from? If Sydney players get a cost of living allowance because it's more expensive up there, shouldn't Melbourne-based teams get more room in the cap than teams from Adelaide? Why the need for the allowance, anyway? It's not as if they're on minimum wage.


Still waiting for closure ... if you get my drift.
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5003
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 86 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396792Post maverick »

ctqs wrote:I reckon Hawks fans would understand if he went to GWS. But going to a premiership rival will hurt his legacy. Where's the money coming from? If Sydney players get a cost of living allowance because it's more expensive up there, shouldn't Melbourne-based teams get more room in the cap than teams from Adelaide? Why the need for the allowance, anyway? It's not as if they're on minimum wage.
I agree completely.
Then we have the GC and Brisbane where property has crashed.
Stupid rule from the dark ages


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7073
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396803Post meher baba »

I think that the Swans have got to seriously the risk of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. The AFL hierarchy presumably wanted Buddy to go to GWS. The other AFL clubs are going to be apoplectic at first Tippett and now Buddy going to the Swans.

Perhaps this will inspire a majority of the clubs to want to take a serious look at the salary cap loading. The difference between Sydney and Melbourne rental prices are not as great as they once were. If any city demands a salary cap loading, it's Perth.

This is all quite a mess.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396805Post plugger66 »

meher baba wrote:I think that the Swans have got to seriously the risk of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. The AFL hierarchy presumably wanted Buddy to go to GWS. The other AFL clubs are going to be apoplectic at first Tippett and now Buddy going to the Swans.

Perhaps this will inspire a majority of the clubs to want to take a serious look at the salary cap loading. The difference between Sydney and Melbourne rental prices are not as great as they once were. If any city demands a salary cap loading, it's Perth.

This is all quite a mess.

Im with you on this. it will not make the AFL or the clubs happy but i also think it is risky for the Swans to lose these players that they will have to lose to get Buddy.


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6002
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 360 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396809Post MC Gusto »

their will be a riot!!!

fast eddie not HAPPY


#1 Ryder fan
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2170
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396810Post Zed »

ctqs wrote:I reckon Hawks fans would understand if he went to GWS. But going to a premiership rival will hurt his legacy. Where's the money coming from? If Sydney players get a cost of living allowance because it's more expensive up there, shouldn't Melbourne-based teams get more room in the cap than teams from Adelaide? Why the need for the allowance, anyway? It's not as if they're on minimum wage.
Mate I've lived in Adelaide for the last 10 years and let me tell you with the morons and drivel you have to put up with in this town you should get an extra 20% if you have to relocate here !!


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
User avatar
duckduckduckgoose
Club Player
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007 12:55pm

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396812Post duckduckduckgoose »

Don't get caught up in the name.... The whole 'living allowance' thing is a thinly veiled PR exercise.

Cost of living has gone through the room out west in the last decade, the dockers and eagles get no such compensation.

It is what it is being used for.
That is- 10% extra to prop the non AFL heartland clubs so they can get and retain gun players.

gun players= success= more supporters= more money.

The AFL have sunk an awful lot of money into Sydney, and they are looking for a return on their investment.



The big question is- who will GWS chase now with all that cash?
Obviously Boyd is now the lockiest of locks that ever locked to go number 1.


I bought a shirt from Target once.
It had a hard tag on it too.

I know how Dal feels.
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2170
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396815Post Zed »

And so goes any chance that any club had of prising Patton out. Securing Boyd with their first pick is a certainty


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396818Post Old Mate »

I guess Cameron, Patton and Boyd will have to do.


User avatar
The Saintsational Man
Club Player
Posts: 1475
Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm

Re: No GWS for buddy

Post: # 1396821Post The Saintsational Man »

.....I've heard that Tom Mitchell didn't originally want to go to Sydney under the father-son rule, but the offer they gave him was too good to refuse, $500,000 in his first season, then $50,000 per year for the next 2.

So if that's true, then that frees up $450,000 for next year & the one after.


Image
Post Reply