Accuracy

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2255
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 548 times

Accuracy

Post: # 1569700Post Beno88 »

It appears as though our accuracy, or inaccuracy, in front of goal is becoming a serious issue.

Obviously our kicking all over the field has been poor, but failing to convert is hurting us more than anything.

Poor kicking in front of goal has arguably cost us four games this year (GWS, Essendon, Bulldogs, Richmond).

This seems as though it's been an ongoing issue for us in recent years. In 2013 the league accuracy average was 53.1%, we were at 50.6%. In 2014, the league average was 58.5%, we were at 50.6%.

This year the league average is 54.7%. We are at 51.5%.

But it's when we lose that it's more alarming.

Our last four losses have seen us kick 29.53! Accuracy of just over 40%. In those games, our opposition has averaged only 2.5 more scoring shots per game but are kicking 5.5 more goals.

I'd like to think this can be improved before poor conversion starts costing us games when it matters.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8520 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569712Post saynta »

Beno88 wrote:It appears as though our accuracy, or inaccuracy, in front of goal is becoming a serious issue.

Obviously our kicking all over the field has been poor, but failing to convert is hurting us more than anything.

Poor kicking in front of goal has arguably cost us four games this year (GWS, Essendon, Bulldogs, Richmond).

This seems as though it's been an ongoing issue for us in recent years. In 2013 the league accuracy average was 53.1%, we were at 50.6%. In 2014, the league average was 58.5%, we were at 50.6%.

This year the league average is 54.7%. We are at 51.5%.

But it's when we lose that it's more alarming.

Our last four losses have seen us kick 29.53! Accuracy of just over 40%. In those games, our opposition has averaged only 2.5 more scoring shots per game but are kicking 5.5 more goals.

I'd like to think this can be improved before poor conversion starts costing us games when it matters.
Great post. Thanks mate.


User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569716Post SENsei »

Bad kicking is bad football is the old saying.

It would be interesting to compare the accuracy of the top 8 versus the bottom 8. Compare their forward entries, to scoring shots and then accuracy.

More time needs to be put into goalkicking in my view, particularly from 30m out directly in front. How professional footballers can miss those is beyond me.


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569775Post Toy Saint »

Statistics can be missleading.

What does 51.5% actually mean? Does it simply mean that 51.5% of our scores are goals, and 48.5% of our scores are points?

Hitting the post from 65% metres is not innacurate, but statistically it may appear that way.

If our forwards would stay in the goal square, and lead and mark (like Plugger did) 30 metres directly in front of goal, I'll bet our statistical accuracy would improve.

On the other hand, if our forwards are running with the flight of the ball from the half back line, and taking problematic shots from great distances then our statistical accuracy would be awefull.

Teaching kicking technique may not necessarily improve accuracy, but a more efficient game plan may do the trick


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569820Post plugger66 »

Toy Saint wrote:Statistics can be missleading.

What does 51.5% actually mean? Does it simply mean that 51.5% of our scores are goals, and 48.5% of our scores are points?

Hitting the post from 65% metres is not innacurate, but statistically it may appear that way.

If our forwards would stay in the goal square, and lead and mark (like Plugger did) 30 metres directly in front of goal, I'll bet our statistical accuracy would improve.

On the other hand, if our forwards are running with the flight of the ball from the half back line, and taking problematic shots from great distances then our statistical accuracy would be awefull.

Teaching kicking technique may not necessarily improve accuracy, but a more efficient game plan may do the trick

Im unsure there is a better way of measuring it especially as Bruce seems to mark close to goal and he has 42 of them.


User avatar
lewdogs
Club Player
Posts: 640
Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569824Post lewdogs »

I thought kicking for goal was the major difference between us and Port on Sunday. We seemed to have a lot of hard set shots and couldn't get them, as well as panicking with some easy ones from general play. Certainly something we need to work on, think it's a mix of skill execution and composure.

Good sides kick accurately for goal so it is certainly an area we need to look at in the off season.


ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1198
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569855Post ROLS-LEE »

A lot of our points on the weekend was rushed. So it throws out your statistics.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8936
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569859Post spert »

When you get clobbered by 10 goals, it's a bit more than accuracy- we were still in it at half time against PA, then ground to a halt. Very disappointing.


Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2255
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 548 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569862Post Beno88 »

ROLS-LEE wrote:A lot of our points on the weekend was rushed. So it throws out your statistics.
2 were rushed. But we also kicked the ball out of bounds on the full in the FWD50 twice.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569868Post plugger66 »

ROLS-LEE wrote:A lot of our points on the weekend was rushed. So it throws out your statistics.

Don't other sides have rushed behinds?


jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569873Post jonesy »

Until parents start letting there kids kick on the streets again and stop feeding Ipad's into there face, kicking in the AFL will continue to be poor. How much has changed, just 20-25 years ago the streets would be littered with kick to kick kids,now,ghost town


Bring back the Lockett era
User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1569950Post Junction Oval »

Toy Saint said in part :
Teaching kicking technique may not necessarily improve accuracy, but a more efficient game plan may do the trick
Kicking - my favourite subject :roll: You make a good point Toy Saint.

It seems that the Saints Supporters have been able to see the problem for years, but the Recruiters don't/can't :evil: Perhaps we may get "lucky" in this area, like Hawthorn.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1186 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Accuracy

Post: # 1570038Post Jacks Back »

Junction Oval wrote:Toy Saint said in part :
Teaching kicking technique may not necessarily improve accuracy, but a more efficient game plan may do the trick
Kicking - my favourite subject :roll: You make a good point Toy Saint.

It seems that the Saints Supporters have been able to see the problem for years, but the Recruiters don't/can't :evil: Perhaps we may get "lucky" in this area, like Hawthorn.
Wind may also have something to do with it for those pesky outdoor games but I reckon it may be windy in Seaford too. Therefore those sport scientists/PE instructors also might have something to do with it as we can't be using our legs and feet to kick for goal more than 5 shots a week (if that). :roll:


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Post Reply