Draft Assessment

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

ripplug66
Club Player
Posts: 1452
Joined: Fri 25 Sep 2015 10:35am

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591673Post ripplug66 »

I have no idea how we went in the draft as no body has but in the trade period we did very well so without even seeing any play its a pass mark. What the club did do is recruit mids and then hopefully more mids. We had our young KPP already at the club so it was the correct idea to get mids. I see it as a very good period for the club but we wont know for sure until another 3 years. Even last years draft looks very good but there is no certainty until another couple of years.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11293
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591685Post Sainternist »

SMS wrote:Draft period
100/100
Carlisle
Freeman
Gresham
White
Rice
We needed speed. CHECK. We wanted to keep our focus of elite kicking. CHECK. toughness. CHECK. Leadership. CHECK.

Absolute stoked!! brandon White wouldve gone top 20 had he not been ill for major scout session and injured during first stages. Cannot believe how stupid recruiters are. HAVE A LOOK AT HIM!! 189cm and sprints like carl lewis in 1989. kicks like birchall he better than bonner and much better peron and attitude .. LOCAL boy!
we are buildinjhg a tough, skilled TEAM. we are doing so well. Team chemistry is high, toughness is huge and skill is elite.
Precisely! We got everything needed on our shopping list. If Carlisle and Freeman show their full potential in 2016, it will go down as very successful period of recruiting.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591691Post Con Gorozidis »

I wonder where we had David Cunningham in our rankings. He was never discussed on here but knightmare had him ranked 28th and Carlton picked him with 23. Pacey midfielder from the Oakleigh chargers. Must have been quite close I reckon. Ill bet we had him ranked higher than Matho;


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591716Post BigMart »

Very solid


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5770
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 755 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591727Post samuraisaint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.
There is no way we will make the top 8 in 2018. That will be the first year without Riewoldt and Montagna and probably Dempster, with Fisher having retired a year before that. It is also likely that Gilbert won't still be playing then either. 2016 bottom four or five finish development year, 2017/18 transition into the mid-table on the ladder. Poor drafting during the glory years compounded by a couple of years under WA Inc when we drafted the WAFL's finest forwards while inexplicably giving away our best drafted WA talent to West Coast for a song has made absolutely sure of that.

If we are back in the 8 and play in a prelim in 2019 the club have done a sensational job.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591739Post Wrote for Luck »

I think the comparison with Melbourne is interesting but if you line it up against:

McCartin, Billings, Freeman, Carlisle, Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Gresham, Newnes, Longer, Bruce, Goddard, Wright, McKenzie, and Lonie - we've done pretty well ourselves.

Obviously haven't mentioned a few others like; Savage, Hickey, Lee (I know), Webster, White, Rice, Sinclair and maybe Templeton/Murdoch into the mix - we are looking even better.

You mention Hogan but would you really trade him for Bruce? I wouldn't.

My only vacancy is for a big bodied midfielder to impose. At the moment we have Armo and Ross. Could do with a 190cm midfielder additional imo.

All things considered I would give us an 8/10 in terms of gut satisfaction.

My only doubt is should we have taken Burton (who may move into midfield). Hope we don't regret it. But very excited about Gresham who makes even Steven appear lanky once the legs are properly ignited.

The guy seems to hit top speed on two steps.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591744Post SuperDuper »

10/10

Now let me clarify. I have no idea how to rank the players, or who should have gone where or whether Gresham is worth pick 14 or pick 7.

But in terms of how the night panned out for the Saints recruiters, it was 10/10.
They knew they would not land players such as Parish.Oliver, Francis... but they *hoped* Gresham, who they rated highly, would make it past Richmond (amongst others)
He made it and that was their favoured result, given the pick we had

Then they hoped no one would bid for Rice at a pick which is lower than the points we had (i.e. before about 30). They didnt.

Then, they hoped that no one would bid for Rice before our 2nd pick, so we could use 40 (originally 43?) for another player. They didnt.

3 hopes realised already

Finally, they hoped that someone we rated highly (top 20) would make it to our 2nd pick... White made it from (allegedly) being rated 14 by our club (excluding academy players)

So.. *all* the cards fell our way

The night rates 10/10

How the draft rates is another question that cannot be determined for 5 years (at least)
Last edited by SuperDuper on Wed 25 Nov 2015 9:13pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591745Post Con Gorozidis »

millarsaint wrote:
My only vacancy is for a big bodied midfielder to impose. At the moment we have Armo and Ross. Could do with a 190cm midfielder additional imo.
People keep forgetting Acres. Way too early be writing him off. Remember he is young. Younger than Templeton and Billings. He is 190cm.
Had 2 VFL games last season with 30+disposals as a 19yo. That proves he can play.

http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... lake-ACRES


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591760Post Wrote for Luck »

Sorry I could have mentioned Acres I certainly didn't forget him, but I don't see him as a big bodied midfielder, but more the clever, cool headed, and damaging with ball use type. He may put on considerably more size and show more pack aggression, hope so.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7793
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 206 times
Been thanked: 552 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591764Post magnifisaint »

samuraisaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.
There is no way we will make the top 8 in 2018. That will be the first year without Riewoldt and Montagna and probably Dempster, with Fisher having retired a year before that. It is also likely that Gilbert won't still be playing then either. 2016 bottom four or five finish development year, 2017/18 transition into the mid-table on the ladder. Poor drafting during the glory years compounded by a couple of years under WA Inc when we drafted the WAFL's finest forwards while inexplicably giving away our best drafted WA talent to West Coast for a song has made absolutely sure of that.

If we are back in the 8 and play in a prelim in 2019 the club have done a sensational job.
You've got to be kidding!


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591765Post Con Gorozidis »

magnifisaint wrote:
samuraisaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.
There is no way we will make the top 8 in 2018. That will be the first year without Riewoldt and Montagna and probably Dempster, with Fisher having retired a year before that. It is also likely that Gilbert won't still be playing then either. 2016 bottom four or five finish development year, 2017/18 transition into the mid-table on the ladder. Poor drafting during the glory years compounded by a couple of years under WA Inc when we drafted the WAFL's finest forwards while inexplicably giving away our best drafted WA talent to West Coast for a song has made absolutely sure of that.

If we are back in the 8 and play in a prelim in 2019 the club have done a sensational job.
You've got to be kidding!
2012-2017 = 6 straight seasons out of the 8.

Surely we need to be in the 8 in 2018? Not saying top 4. Just saying 5-8.

7 straight seasons out of the 8 would be disastrous. It would also mean our recruitment has failed.
If we can't make the 8 in 2018 - it basically means this whole generation of players arent much chop.

Losing Gilbo wont be a loss and Fisher will probably only play 5-10 games in 2016 anyway so neither of those seem like excuses for not making the 8 in 2018.
Yes losing Dempster, Roo, Joey will hurt but we are making that transition already.


ripplug66
Club Player
Posts: 1452
Joined: Fri 25 Sep 2015 10:35am

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591767Post ripplug66 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
samuraisaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.
There is no way we will make the top 8 in 2018. That will be the first year without Riewoldt and Montagna and probably Dempster, with Fisher having retired a year before that. It is also likely that Gilbert won't still be playing then either. 2016 bottom four or five finish development year, 2017/18 transition into the mid-table on the ladder. Poor drafting during the glory years compounded by a couple of years under WA Inc when we drafted the WAFL's finest forwards while inexplicably giving away our best drafted WA talent to West Coast for a song has made absolutely sure of that.

If we are back in the 8 and play in a prelim in 2019 the club have done a sensational job.
You've got to be kidding!
2012-2017 = 6 straight seasons out of the 8.

Surely we need to be in the 8 in 2018? Not saying top 4. Just saying 5-8.

7 straight seasons out of the 8 would be disastrous. It would also mean our recruitment has failed.
If we can't make the 8 in 2018 - it basically means this whole generation of players arent much chop.

Losing Gilbo wont be a loss and Fisher will probably only play 5-10 games in 2016 anyway so neither of those seem like excuses for not making the 8 in 2018.
Yes losing Dempster, Roo, Joey will hurt but we are making that transition already.

Unless Fisher is injured he will play most games this season. He isn't running around to help players like some others do. he wants to play. Gilbert is a loss if he has a good season. If he is injured or doesn't then he obviously isn't a loss. As for making the transition I agree on Joey and Dempster but there is no transition on Rooy. Its nearly impossible to transition a once in a generation KPP. I'm with samarisaint and would suggest 2018 may still be a middling year. We may or may not sneak into the 8 but I don't get how 9th makes the recruiting a failure but 8th doesn't. I do worry about 2017 if about 4 players leave and that is why we need to manage the players leaving after next season. Fisher will surely retire but we also need to let another older player go. You wouldn't want to lose Joey, Fisher, Dempster and maybe Gilbert at the end on 2017. That would make 2018 very hard word especially if those players had played most games.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 582 times
Been thanked: 433 times
Contact:

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591786Post samoht »

10/10

We've recruited the best available prospects - significantly, those we considered would bring much needed outside run to complement our bevy (maybe even surfeit?) of inside midfielders (adding outside run was always our aim, as Elshaug pointed out) - and on that basis, 10/10!


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4557
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 357 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591847Post loris »

Con Gorozidis wrote: I guess it comes to down performance.

Noone should be spared.
Are we going to rookie him, or leave him at Sandi??????


User avatar
Plissken
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon 23 Nov 2015 8:55pm

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591849Post Plissken »

Hello guys/gals im a newbie here and just popped my saintsational cherry with this post :D

Im pretty good with my Saints knowledge , especially the 80s & 90s players/games etc but ill admit i dont go over the draft period with a fine tooth comb.
So out of Gresham,White & Rice do we give any a chance of making an impact next season in the same way Lonie or Sinc's did or are we looking a bit more long term?
I know Rice played a little VFL with Carltank so he's maybe a little more advanced .
If Freeman can get his hammy right he should be ready for an early call up cos hes already been in the system for a couple of yrs and seems pretty strong in the upper body.
For those who have watched Gresham , do you think its his tank or bulk that need the most work to reach AFL standard?


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591852Post st.byron »

Plissken wrote:Hello guys/gals im a newbie here and just popped my saintsational cherry with this post :D

Im pretty good with my Saints knowledge , especially the 80s & 90s players/games etc but ill admit i dont go over the draft period with a fine tooth comb.
So out of Gresham,White & Rice do we give any a chance of making an impact next season in the same way Lonie or Sinc's did or are we looking a bit more long term?
I know Rice played a little VFL with Carltank so he's maybe a little more advanced .
If Freeman can get his hammy right he should be ready for an early call up cos hes already been in the system for a couple of yrs and seems pretty strong in the upper body.
For those who have watched Gresham , do you think its his tank or bulk that need the most work to reach AFL standard?
Welcome to SS......you sound like a long time Sainter....


User avatar
Plissken
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon 23 Nov 2015 8:55pm

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591861Post Plissken »

st.byron wrote:
Plissken wrote:Hello guys/gals im a newbie here and just popped my saintsational cherry with this post :D

Im pretty good with my Saints knowledge , especially the 80s & 90s players/games etc but ill admit i dont go over the draft period with a fine tooth comb.
So out of Gresham,White & Rice do we give any a chance of making an impact next season in the same way Lonie or Sinc's did or are we looking a bit more long term?
I know Rice played a little VFL with Carltank so he's maybe a little more advanced .
If Freeman can get his hammy right he should be ready for an early call up cos hes already been in the system for a couple of yrs and seems pretty strong in the upper body.
For those who have watched Gresham , do you think its his tank or bulk that need the most work to reach AFL standard?
Welcome to SS......you sound like a long time Sainter....
yeah.
Since late 70s. Been a member for nearly 25yrs.
Went a very long time without missing a game but nowdays prob go to 5 or so games and watch the rest on telly.
For some sadistic reason i have very fond memories of the 80s even though our team was about as useful as an inflatable dartboard.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592094Post Bluthy »

Plissken wrote:Hello guys/gals im a newbie here and just popped my saintsational cherry with this post :D

Im pretty good with my Saints knowledge , especially the 80s & 90s players/games etc but ill admit i dont go over the draft period with a fine tooth comb.
So out of Gresham,White & Rice do we give any a chance of making an impact next season in the same way Lonie or Sinc's did or are we looking a bit more long term?
I know Rice played a little VFL with Carltank so he's maybe a little more advanced .
If Freeman can get his hammy right he should be ready for an early call up cos hes already been in the system for a couple of yrs and seems pretty strong in the upper body.
For those who have watched Gresham , do you think its his tank or bulk that need the most work to reach AFL standard?
I could see Gresham playing a bit of seniors next year. As smaller young guys, they'll be managing the bodies of Lonie, Sinclair and Billings carefully. Gresham looks like he's got the poise to deal with the pace of AFL and he seems to get around the ground well.

White may be handled a bit like McKenzie - needs to do his time developing and there will be quite a few in front of him in that rebounding half back role.

Rice may be a bit more seasoned (looks a decent size) and the club would be tempted to give him a game early to then trumpet the father-son connection.


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592098Post White Winmar »

loris wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote: I guess it comes to down performance.

Noone should be spared.
Are we going to rookie him, or leave him at Sandi??????
Sharp as ever, Loris :D


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592103Post longtimesaint »

samuraisaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.
There is no way we will make the top 8 in 2018. That will be the first year without Riewoldt and Montagna and probably Dempster, with Fisher having retired a year before that. It is also likely that Gilbert won't still be playing then either. 2016 bottom four or five finish development year, 2017/18 transition into the mid-table on the ladder. Poor drafting during the glory years compounded by a couple of years under WA Inc when we drafted the WAFL's finest forwards while inexplicably giving away our best drafted WA talent to West Coast for a song has made absolutely sure of that.

If we are back in the 8 and play in a prelim in 2019 the club have done a sensational job.
You can't say we won't make the 8 in 2018 as young players in second to fourth seasons can have a break out year.
With the players drafted/traded in the last 3/4 years I think we will be able to cover the loss of Gilbert, Dempster and Joey by 2017
Replacing Rooey is much more difficult as he has been one of the champions of the game.
However great champions have always retired eventually and someone usually steps up.
It may be Paddy McCartin or we may recruit a free agent by 2017/18.


One year will be our year
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592112Post Con Gorozidis »

Do we actually have to replace Roo? We just need a good functioning fwd line with 6 good players in it. We dont necessarily need the big star to win a flag. Heck we nearly won a flag in 1997 with a no name fwd line. Winmar was the biggest star back then.


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592114Post longtimesaint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Do we actually have to replace Roo? We just need a good functioning fwd line with 6 good players in it. We dont necessarily need the big star to win a flag. Heck we nearly won a flag in 1997 with a no name fwd line. Winmar was the biggest star back then.
We did have Stewie Loewe and Everitt in 97


One year will be our year
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12706
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592115Post Mr Magic »

longtimesaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Do we actually have to replace Roo? We just need a good functioning fwd line with 6 good players in it. We dont necessarily need the big star to win a flag. Heck we nearly won a flag in 1997 with a no name fwd line. Winmar was the biggest star back then.
We did have Stewie Loewe and Everitt in 97
Barry Hall
Jason Heatley


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592124Post Con Gorozidis »

longtimesaint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Do we actually have to replace Roo? We just need a good functioning fwd line with 6 good players in it. We dont necessarily need the big star to win a flag. Heck we nearly won a flag in 1997 with a no name fwd line. Winmar was the biggest star back then.
We did have Stewie Loewe and Everitt in 97
True.
not a bad fwd line really.. A good mix. The point is u cant rely on one star. U need a few good players.
Four good players is better than one star. So the point stands. We dont need to replace roo. We just need Bruce billings mccartin membrey lonie to be a good unit that kick goals.


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1592166Post Goose is king »

True Con. Some goal kicking mids would also be great. It's something we never really have had


Post Reply