TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830062Post longtimesaint »

Surely we had a committed from Sydney and Richmond for Jones and Butler before trading Bruce for those picks


One year will be our year
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11293
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830063Post Sainternist »

Who let the Bruce out???

BRUCE-BRUCE-BRUCE-BRUCE!!

[media] [/media]


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 296 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830065Post saintkid »

longtimesaint wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:48pm Surely we had a committed from Sydney and Richmond for Jones and Butler before trading Bruce for those picks
We will find out in 37 mins.......if it ends like this there's more egg on the faces of the supporters.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4181
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1367 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830070Post cwrcyn »

Bruce and Keith to Bulldogs. Daylight robbery by Bulldogs.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 705 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830080Post saintsRrising »

cwrcyn wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 7:13pm Bruce and Keith to Bulldogs. Daylight robbery by Bulldogs.
Well Bruce was pretty much what I expected and Keath was always going to cost less trade wise than Bruce.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
BringBackMadDog
Club Player
Posts: 1960
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830128Post BringBackMadDog »

skeptic wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:04pm This has been a very disappointing day
s*** you’re hard to please, we are a far better footy club after today


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830142Post suss »

BringBackMadDog wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 8:14pm
skeptic wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:04pm This has been a very disappointing day
s*** you’re hard to please, we are a far better footy club after today
To be fair, today is not yesterday and yesterday we made out like bandits.


sendmehomehappy
Club Player
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008 12:39am
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830147Post sendmehomehappy »

Yeah, I reckon the trade team deserve to celebrate with a good pissup tonight.


" If thought corrupts language then language can also corrupt thought."

Politics and the English Language George Orwell
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830150Post SaintPav »

st.byron wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:04pm 32 and 51 equal to pick 22.

Reasonable.
Doesn’t feel like it.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11200
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2457 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830175Post B.M »

How does a pick 20 placeS below pick 32 make it ten places better??


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830189Post fugazi »

cwrcyn wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 7:13pm Bruce and Keith to Bulldogs. Daylight robbery by Bulldogs.
Bulldogs just about won the trade period IMO.
Gave not much for 2 really good players. Held on to this years 1sr rounder.


Nee!
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830191Post fugazi »

Be interesting to see who we play on Brucey.
Carlisle can't keep up with him, maybe Battle?

Howard to Naughton

Wilkie/ Carlisle to Shache


Nee!
SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830200Post SMS »

Dogs did well here.
They KNEW Keith hated crows and wouldnt go back and Crows knew this.
and Bruce they knew we dont need or want a forward on the books now mccartin is having a go aling with king/ryder/marshal/battle/membrey.

So they had us and crows by the balls BUT at the sane time these two could equal a flag. kudos to fellow minnow they held strong


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22574
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8533 times
Been thanked: 3758 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830298Post saynta »

s*** trade. Really pathetic. Bruce for Jones and Butler. A key forward who is one of the best pressure players and marks in the AFL for a couple of back up flankers who both played a fair portion of the season at reserve level .

I will be reminding the club how poor the deal was when the Doggies beat us by two or three goals in the future with Bruce kicking bagfulls while Butler and possibly Jones are kicking up the dew at Sandringham.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22926
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1706 times

Re: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830486Post Teflon »

evertonfc wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:16pm
fugazi wrote: Wed 16 Oct 2019 6:11pm GWS deal was a win
Port deal was a win
Hill was a mild loss
Steven was a bad loss
Bruce slight unders
Butler should be a win
Jones ?
Factor in next year's compromised draft and the salary cap space freed up and I still think we have moved ahead.
But we won't get anything from this draft and very little from the next; have to factor that in.

Also have to factor in that we picked up just two kids last year (King and Bytel).

After going all-in on youth, we have abandoned that policy, and gone all-in on short-term.

Our timelines for success has been rapidly brought forward - the club must believe it can win a premiership before Brad Hill turns 30.

It's an extraordinary gamble. But hey, if it pays off, power to them.
I worry a little about that also plus the fact that right now this list doesn’t have elite talent on it (Hill probably closest now to it). We probably need 2-3 elite guns to be honest.....think Hayes, Goddard, Dal Santo, Montagna etc....or a Bont or Cripps...
That aside, I think we’ve turned a corner.
We now have landed players who wanted to come to us......Hill and Dougal look very good
We’ll get 6 years from Hill, Jones is 24 (Acres age), Dougal 23; Butler 23 etc
Ryder won’t see our next flag but he’s short term necessary
I think we’ve re balanced the list, become something of a destination club AND if we can show something on field......we just might become that elite player destination club...
Only worry.....hearing Lethlean say on radio our cap is becoming quite tight......that worried me.....but I guess it’s manageable if we need to make further room for a true gun....
I read Acres was se to be on $500k next year.....amazing for a “potential” player not a star....but with the cap the money has to be spent so we have little choice.....least we’ve cleared some space with him, Bruce and Stevens so hopefully re balancing that money to a Hill etc who is a gun and who we get 5-6 good years out of makes sense...
List wise we still have work to do.
Newnes.....no one wanted (except Richo) Dmac......couldn’t be given away and if you look at Hawks delisting meatball recently you can see we’ve had a period of carrying players to long who are just not going to make it.....
Hard to trade when you don’t have much to offer.....think we did ok .


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Bowey Boy
Club Player
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005 7:15pm
Location: Animal Enclosure
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830554Post Bowey Boy »

Clearly settling in well at the dogs...

......”and big Tim English will be putting it down their throat and then hopefully ‘The Bont’ [Marcus Bontempelli] is putting it down my throat.”


"I think, 'You kick a footy mate, you kick a footy. It's not like you've got a cure for cancer. You kick a footy, stop thinking you are so special'." - Samantha Black
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22926
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1706 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830576Post Teflon »

Bowey Boy wrote: Fri 18 Oct 2019 8:35am Clearly settling in well at the dogs...

......”and big Tim English will be putting it down their throat and then hopefully ‘The Bont’ [Marcus Bontempelli] is putting it down my throat.”
Worrying what’s going on over there with everyone putting it down each others throats...


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10685
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830719Post ace »

Only played 99 games for St Kilda.
Not even a father-son pick in the deal.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10685
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830738Post ace »

Bowey Boy wrote: Fri 18 Oct 2019 8:35am Clearly settling in well at the dogs...

......”and big Tim English will be putting it down their throat and then hopefully ‘The Bont’ [Marcus Bontempelli] is putting it down my throat.”
If only Alan Jones had suggested putting a football down the throat of Ah Der n.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830764Post Joffa Burns »

saynta wrote: Thu 17 Oct 2019 10:38am s*** trade. Really pathetic. Bruce for Jones and Butler. A key forward who is one of the best pressure players and marks in the AFL for a couple of back up flankers who both played a fair portion of the season at reserve level .

I will be reminding the club how poor the deal was when the Doggies beat us by two or three goals in the future with Bruce kicking bagfulls while Butler and possibly Jones are kicking up the dew at Sandringham.
That is just fabricated BS about Zac Jones.
Played 17 games in the firsts and 0 in the NEAFL.
Missed the last two games with a hammy and a block of 3 mid season also with injury.
Jones was a walk up start in the best 18 at Swans for the last 3 years.

I’m not saying it was a great trade or I wanted Bruce to go in favor of these two, just don’t agree with making up BS about Jones to support your argument.

Jones is no perennial fringe player like Kent or gun past his best like Hannebery or Ryder, he is a solid B grade AFL player currently in his prime.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22574
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8533 times
Been thanked: 3758 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830803Post saynta »

s*** trade. Really pathetic. Bruce for Jones and Butler. A key forward who is one of the best pressure players and marks in the AFL for a couple of back up flankers one of whom played a fair portion of the season at reserve level .

I will be reminding the club how poor the deal was when the Doggies beat us by two or three goals in the future with Bruce kicking bagfulls while Butler and possibly Jones are kicking up the dew at Sandringham.


That better JB?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830880Post SaintPav »

Saints weren’t prepared or couldn’t match Shitscray’s offer which apparently was too good to refuse. Bruce is probably collateral damage stemming from Hannebery deal. A further reason to be pissed off about that deal. Just when he might be getting his body right he then goes and does something stupid and injures himself.

I would have much preferred to keep Bruce but if it’s Jones and Butler for Bruce then it might not be too bad. Remember they’re now planning to use Marshall in the forward line for around 70-80% of the game is my best guess. Marshall is a huge unit who has a few tricks and he can run so he’ll probably attract the best backman which will free up King and Membrey a bit. If he replicates what he did in the ruck this year as a forward and becomes the player we think he can be, we’ll quickly forget about Bruce.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830881Post Ghost Like »

Does no one else find it funny (Luke Ball type stench) that the Dogs came to Bruce mid season (or his management went to them)? This coincided with possibly his best game, the North game in Hobart, & a rich vein of form to the end of the year. I'm really not sure the Club is to blame here, I suspect Bruce or his management as being duplicitous.

He's done, he's gone...I've far more interest and investment in Jones, Hill, Ryder, Howard and Butler - they all want to be at St Kilda (when the Saints go marching in).


User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830887Post diddley »

Ghost Like wrote: Sun 20 Oct 2019 9:16am Does no one else find it funny (Luke Ball type stench) that the Dogs came to Bruce mid season (or his management went to them)? This coincided with possibly his best game, the North game in Hobart, & a rich vein of form to the end of the year. I'm really not sure the Club is to blame here, I suspect Bruce or his management as being duplicitous.
This is what is commonly referred to as “clutching at straws”.

When people say “mid season”, it could be referring to the middle part (roughly round 11), the mid section (rounds 8-16), or just plain during the season (any possible round of the year).
It is just pure speculation on when it happened, but to attribute that to a run of form, is just ludicrous.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: TRADED: Bruce for 32 and 51

Post: # 1830889Post Joffa Burns »

diddley wrote: Sun 20 Oct 2019 10:37am
Ghost Like wrote: Sun 20 Oct 2019 9:16am Does no one else find it funny (Luke Ball type stench) that the Dogs came to Bruce mid season (or his management went to them)? This coincided with possibly his best game, the North game in Hobart, & a rich vein of form to the end of the year. I'm really not sure the Club is to blame here, I suspect Bruce or his management as being duplicitous.
This is what is commonly referred to as “clutching at straws”.

When people say “mid season”, it could be referring to the middle part (roughly round 11), the mid section (rounds 8-16), or just plain during the season (any possible round of the year).
It is just pure speculation on when it happened, but to attribute that to a run of form, is just ludicrous.
Didn’t Gallagher reference being in communication with Hills management since quite early in the season?

All clubs, players and managers would undertake this behavior.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Post Reply