Team vs Port

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3091
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 791 times
Been thanked: 436 times

Team vs Port

Post: # 1854411Post shrodes »

IN: Hind, Parker, Sinclair
OUT: Battle (injured), Byrnes, Lonie (omitted)


Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854412Post Gershwin »

shrodes wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 7:26pm IN: Hind, Parker, Sinclair
OUT: Battle (injured), Byrnes, Lonie (omitted)
Good team. I like it.


summertime and the living is easy ........
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2592
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1163 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854413Post Saintmatt »

I like that mix of ins. Pace and footskills. That’s pretty much how Carlton almost got over Port last week.


Go you red, black & white warriors
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854414Post fugazi »

Parker in...good to see. Fast aggressive and can take a grab


Nee!
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6080
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1568 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854415Post CQ SAINT »

Caught me by surprise but there's enough confidence in all three to come in and impact. Good changes.


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854417Post Goose is king »

Burton, Motlop and Westoff out for Port. Good news


George27
Club Player
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
Has thanked: 891 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854418Post George27 »

CQ SAINT wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 7:43pm Caught me by surprise but there's enough confidence in all three to come in and impact. Good changes.
Agree. Parker a tallish option to replace Battle. Sinclair rewarded for good form in the scratch matches ( and has been an emergency for 5 or 6 weeks ) . Lonie’s omission reminds them that blokes have to keep performing . Shame for young Byrnes, but he did struggle last week and I expect he will get another chance in the coming block of games.


StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 233 times
Contact:

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854419Post StPeter »

I like it.


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 587 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854420Post remboy »

Makes us even quicker, and we already looked swift.
Battle out means we really need something from Marshall orRyder when they go forward.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17028
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2918 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854421Post skeptic »

I like it.

Don’t think we’re going to win but I like the ins, the rewards for form and the team balance

Am most surprised about Matty Parker... thought he was still getting his fitness up. Good for him to get the opportunity, hope he can grasp it because we know that Lonie will be fighting like hell to get it back.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854422Post older saint »

What i like is unlike previous years we are starting to select players who replace the change for position.

Lonie - Parker Smaller forwards needing to bring pressure
Battle is a utility, Sinclair plays that wing utility role ( yes Battle bigger ) gone for quicker version
Byrnes is a pacey player, hind brings the same.

look what richmond does one steps in to replace the position. Perhaps as we don't have our own reserve team having guys run practise games without the influence of a third party has allowed the coaches to train players in games for specific roles if they get a call up. WB, Rich and Coll great examples where they used their reserves to do this and a next man up mentality . The guys coming in doesn't need to learn a new role . Could be a bonus of the situation


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19099
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2018 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854424Post SaintPav »

Good to see Dorkoff out.

He always tears us a new one.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17028
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2918 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854425Post skeptic »

older saint wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:09pm What i like is unlike previous years we are starting to select players who replace the change for position.

Lonie - Parker Smaller forwards needing to bring pressure
Battle is a utility, Sinclair plays that wing utility role ( yes Battle bigger ) gone for quicker version
Byrnes is a pacey player, hind brings the same.

look what richmond does one steps in to replace the position. Perhaps as we don't have our own reserve team having guys run practise games without the influence of a third party has allowed the coaches to train players in games for specific roles if they get a call up. WB, Rich and Coll great examples where they used their reserves to do this and a next man up mentality . The guys coming in doesn't need to learn a new role . Could be a bonus of the situation
Hahaha

That’s so true.

Out - Lonie, In - Brown
Out - Battle, In - Paton
Out - Byrnes, In - Kent


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854427Post saynta »

Gershwin wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 7:31pm
shrodes wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 7:26pm IN: Hind, Parker, Sinclair
OUT: Battle (injured), Byrnes, Lonie (omitted)
Good team. I like it.
Yeah. Good


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10781
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854428Post ace »

Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.

Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10781
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854429Post ace »

B Nick Coffield Callum Wilkie Jake Carlisle
HB Bradley Hill Dougal Howard Sebastian Ross
C Jarryn Geary Hunter Clark Jack Billings
HF Dan Butler Jade Gresham Dean Kent
F Matty Parker Tim Membrey Max King
R Paddy Ryder Jack Steele Zak Jones
INT Ben Paton Jack Sinclair Nicholas Hind
Rowan Marshall
E Daniel McKenzie Jonathon Marsh Jack Lonie
Ryan Byrnes


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854430Post saynta »

ace wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:50pm Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.

Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?
maybe. Dumb move from him. :wink:
Last edited by saynta on Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:53pm, edited 1 time in total.


footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854431Post footynut »

I like the it's (assuming Parker is fit), but where is Hannebery? I think he's leadership adds some intangibles.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10781
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854432Post ace »

Gresham named at centre half forward two weeks in row.
Is he better than Riewoldt ?


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854434Post saynta »

emergencies are.

Marsh, McKenzie, Lonie and Byrnes.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17028
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2918 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854437Post skeptic »

footynut wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:53pm I like the it's (assuming Parker is fit), but where is Hannebery? I think he's leadership adds some intangibles.
Doubtful that he was omitted so he mustn’t have come up


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4564
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854438Post whiskers3614 »

skeptic wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 9:14pm
footynut wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:53pm I like the it's (assuming Parker is fit), but where is Hannebery? I think he's leadership adds some intangibles.
Doubtful that he was omitted so he mustn’t have come up
Suffering from Hamill/Freeman syndrome :evil:


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5928
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 857 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854439Post samuraisaint »

Goose is king wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 7:50pm Burton, Motlop and Westoff out for Port. Good news
Westoff always kills us.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854440Post Ghost Like »

skeptic wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 9:14pm
footynut wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:53pm I like the it's (assuming Parker is fit), but where is Hannebery? I think he's leadership adds some intangibles.
Doubtful that he was omitted so he mustn’t have come up
Omitted? I think he needs to be in before he's omitted but kinda understand what you mean skeptic.

Sadly this is becoming the norm / expectation with him. Unless he can get on the park and string some games together and actually contribute to an upwards trend for St Kilda, he'll always be our & Lethlean's albatross.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9142
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Team vs Port

Post: # 1854442Post spert »

ace wrote: Thu 23 Jul 2020 8:50pm Surprised at Lonie omission he provides so much pressure.
But then that maybe a case of needing to rotate players over this and the following 4 matches.
Hannebury not risked.
A win over Port would be bous but we don't need to risk our players ahead of better potetial wins.

Was Lonie omitted because he stole a free kick which required him to checkside kick ?
I think one of the things that Ratts is trying to improve is forward defensive pressure- it was poor against the Dockers, and we let the Crows get it out of our forward line too easy for part of the game on Monday, and it helped them get back into it. Lonie hasn't got the bulk to compete against strong defenders- could be why Parker is getting a run.


Post Reply