st.byron wrote: ↑Thu 02 Mar 2023 8:27pm
Vortex wrote: ↑Thu 02 Mar 2023 12:50pm
For example, let's go back to my good friend Happyfeet and his post that started all of this latest brewhaha. ......................The big problem Happyfeet made was he assumed he held exclusivity over this area of knowledge and came in real hot and this can be problematic when conversing on an anonymous social media platform. I knew he knew enough to be dangerous about ISO9001, but he was factually incorrect in some of his claims and thought he could bamboozle us with his knowledge. Then the biggest mistake St.Byron made was interjecting with his aggressive moderating style towards me, if he had of just let Happyfeet and myself to our own devices we would have talked it out and moved on pretty quickly I recon.
But alas here we today, many days later, in a thread that has generated more interest than the Kane Cornes thread, and you my Friend Firey have probably contributed to it the most.
Vortex, here is what actually happened :
In the "Cuz disappointed" thread, You stated that the ISO9001 accreditation process was virtue signalling.
Happy feet replied with,
"ISO9001 virtue signaling, no I don’t think so."
You responded with,
"you are so funny, coming out hot at any opportunity, yeah ok, obviously I didn't mean the 9001 certificate is virtue signalling, I meant it was similar to all the different certifications you need to do business with government. You'd know a bit about that though Mr Public Servant. probably explains a bit."
How is happy feet's post "coming out hot"? He stated that he doesn't think ISO9001 is virtue signalling. Pretty straight forward.
Please tell me how your comment about Mr.Public Servant is not intended as belittling and derogatory?
Happy feet responded with :
"You wrote it, not me..............If you have a problem with public servants, take it elsewhere, as you point out all the time this is about footy. But you stray from the topic, bait others like you did to me, then run squealing to the moderator claiming you have been wronged when you started the whole issue."
There's nothing in breach of the rules in this post. In fact it's startlingly accurate.
You reported happy feet's post and attached the following message to the report :
"Come on this is your doing. You made it clear with your post you will moderate based on my previous posting which really signalled to the board there were separate rules for me which really only created a bullying and pile on mentality. Please fix it by applying the rules without your agenda."
So......you took the thread off topic and you turned it into a personal attack......yet you're the one reporting posts and claiming your perceived abuse is my fault. You did EXACTLY what happy feet said. You strayed from the topic, turned it into a personal attack and then ran squealing to the moderator claiming you've been wronged, throwing in finger pointing at the moderator as well. You take zero responsibility for your behaviour. You even see fit to send me condescending philosophical messages attached to your reports, as though you're coming from a place of moral authority.
You also go into long winded blurbs about how you're being victimised, you're a solid footy oriented poster and if only the mod would stop being biased everything would be fine.
This is A grade gaslighting.
And this is EXACTLY the kind of behaviour that many people have had enough of. Just scroll through the thread and count them.
As amusingname so accurately summed it up, "at other times I have seen some insight in your posts about football. The rest of the noise is just irritating and gives people like myself even less motivation to be involved in posting."
This is the issue. You love to talk about how much better Big Footy is and people shifting over there. It's EXACTLY your kind of behaviour that drives people away. And it won't be tolerated any more.
As I have said already, last chance.
