How bad are the others? Still 6th!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

axcellence
Club Player
Posts: 1358
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021733Post axcellence »

Yeah the gap between the top two and the rest seems insurmountable.

Melbourne got a win against Pies on their grand final. Lions win at the Gabba, but the GF is on MCG. Their best bet is to get Port on a GF…. which is still not a good omen.

But it sure does feel like the rest of the comp is just making up numbers. Pies have gone up and up and saints hardly look like the team that lost to the pies by less than 10 points earlier in the season.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021734Post samuraisaint »

axcellence wrote: Sun 23 Jul 2023 8:11am Yeah the gap between the top two and the rest seems insurmountable.

Melbourne got a win against Pies on their grand final. Lions win at the Gabba, but the GF is on MCG. Their best bet is to get Port on a GF…. which is still not a good omen.

But it sure does feel like the rest of the comp is just making up numbers. Pies have gone up and up and saints hardly look like the team that lost to the pies by less than 10 points earlier in the season.
Port are in real trouble for mine.
They needed to win that last night - lost by a kick, sure, but so did we when we played Collingwood over there, and we didn't have a home ground advantage to play on.
Nope, Port are in strife. I reckon they lose the next two as well, and probably more.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18535
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1875 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021735Post SaintPav »

The Fireman wrote: Sun 23 Jul 2023 2:24am
SaintPav wrote: Sun 23 Jul 2023 1:02am Looking grim. Pathetic that the usual losers on here some take solace in that.
hmm aren't we all usual losers ?
Not you specifically but if the shoe fits.. 8-)


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4526
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1293 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021745Post Yorkeys »

The company line has been the list is poor, coaching is great, we are not in a position to handle success, range of ladder possible positions is 6 -12. It was probably uncomfortable for the management to be hanging on to 5th for so long like unworthy over achievers and enabling our expectations to rise - ever so slightly. Unfortunately it seems the object is to target the lower end of the predicted range not over achieve. That lower target takes pressure off coaching staff by lowering expectations and the well worn next preseason/draft card can be played. Problem is once fixed on a descent rather than improvement it can become self fullfilling and very hard to reverse - that ballast just wont eject!. Its at the opposite end of the we can do it scale from Coach McCrae. Anyway, go for 12th and lets be grateful for those unlikely early season wins. The Coach's words will provide comfort as other comparable sides leave us behind. Tick boxes, as many as applicable: injuries, youth, previous government, talent pool, fixturing, adapting to change, weather, big occasion syndrome: (none of which apply to sides above us, lucky devils).


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6147
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 818 times
Been thanked: 960 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021746Post Vortex »

Yorkeys wrote: Sun 23 Jul 2023 12:12pm The company line has been the list is poor, coaching is great, we are not in a position to handle success, range of ladder possible positions is 6 -12. It was probably uncomfortable for the management to be hanging on to 5th for so long like unworthy over achievers and enabling our expectations to rise - ever so slightly. Unfortunately it seems the object is to target the lower end of the predicted range not over achieve. That lower target takes pressure off coaching staff by lowering expectations and the well worn next preseason/draft card can be played. Problem is once fixed on a descent rather than improvement it can become self fullfilling and very hard to reverse - that ballast just wont eject!. Its at the opposite end of the we can do it scale from Coach McCrae. Anyway, go for 12th and lets be grateful for those unlikely early season wins. The Coach's words will provide comfort as other comparable sides leave us behind. Tick boxes, as many as applicable: injuries, youth, previous government, talent pool, fixturing, adapting to change, weather, big occasion syndrome: (none of which apply to sides above us, lucky devils).
It’s the vibe, it’s the vibe, it’s about exploration, it’s about audits, it’s the vibe, yeah it’s the vibe.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8957
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021754Post perfectionist »

A win by 5 goals or more will see us 5th, which will be where we were before losing four of our previous five. I bet that hasn't happened too often. But I am getting ahead of myself. A win today is by no means a cert.


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7252
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: How bad are the others? Still 6th!

Post: # 2021793Post chook23 »

How bad are we given Suns today


saint4life
Post Reply