Daniel Kerr - PSD target???

saintspremiers · Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:34pm

The eeeeeagles are flying a bit too high at the moment, and they need
to weed out bad eggs pretty smartly.

One Daniel Kerr is far, far from a cleanskin.....my questions are:

(1) Is he contracted for 2008 (or beyond)

(2) Are the Eagles a bit unsure if he's the right type of cattle (post Cousins debacle) for a possible "rebranded/relaunced" Eagles team?

(3) Would Kerr prosper in Melbourne away from the whole dodgy Perth scene??

IMO whether or not this is even a sceric of a chance, there must be several Eagles players that are on a knife edge and ripe for a picking!

robbie muir · Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:37pm

He is signed for 2008

There is no way the eagles will let Kerr go after losing both Cousins & Judd

If by some miracle he left and went into the PSD there are 7 teams picking before us

fonz_#15 · Post: # 478920Post **fonz_#15** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:39pm

i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

plugger66 · Post: # 478921Post **plugger66** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:40pm

fonz_#15 wrote:i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

That may be true but they did lose to the pies in overtime without either of them so their depth is pretty good.

ben_fff · Post: # 478925Post **ben_fff** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:44pm

plugger66 wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

That may be true but they did lose to the pies in overtime without either of them so their depth is pretty good.

not to mention 4 points the week before which would have given them a home prelim.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 478929Post **fonz_#15** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:47pm

plugger66 wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

That may be true but they did lose to the pies in overtime without either of them so their depth is pretty good.

no doubting their depth, its extraordinary but judd and cousins are Mark Johnson or Shane Birss

Armoooo · Post: # 478940Post **Armoooo** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 8:56pm

fonz_#15 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

That may be true but they did lose to the pies in overtime without either of them so their depth is pretty good.
no doubting their depth, its extraordinary but judd and cousins are Mark Johnson or Shane Birss

what?

fonz_#15 · Post: # 478959Post **fonz_#15** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 9:11pm

Armoooo wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:i reckon the eagles are in big shyte for next season..
tey have good midfield depth but they have lost 2 of the comps best 5 midfielders in 2 weeks.

hardly good for a teams premiership credentials.

That may be true but they did lose to the pies in overtime without either of them so their depth is pretty good.
no doubting their depth, its extraordinary but judd and cousins are no Mark Johnson or Shane Birss
what?

i meant to write that judd and cousins and judd are NO m.johnson or s.birss but i cant type

ben_fff · Post: # 478965Post **ben_fff** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 9:19pm

I still don't get it.

fonz_#15 · Post: # 478981Post **fonz_#15** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 9:35pm

i'm tying to say that they are not just GOP's that are easy to replace like someone like johnson or birss would be on their respective lists..

i'm just no good at phrasing these things

battye · Post: # 479025Post **battye** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 10:19pm

fonz_#15 wrote:i'm tying to say that they are not just GOP's that are easy to replace like someone like johnson or birss would be on their respective lists..

i'm just no good at phrasing these things

What do you mean?

Just kidding mate, I understood the first time

fonz_#15 · Post: # 479036Post **fonz_#15** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 10:30pm

battye wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:i'm tying to say that they are not just GOP's that are easy to replace like someone like johnson or birss would be on their respective lists..

i'm just no good at phrasing these things
What do you mean?

Just kidding mate, I understood the first time

so you passed primary school unlike our fellow saintsationalists...

vacuous space · Thu 18 Oct 2007 10:34pm

West Coast still have a pretty good mifield. Kerr, Priddis, Stenglein, Selwood, Embley, Braun, Butler, Rosa, Hurn. Even without Judd and Cousins they'll be closer to the top than the bottom next year.

battye · Post: # 479046Post **battye** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 10:35pm

Even if he was delisted, even if he was in the PSD, even if he was available at our pick... no. We don't need his type.

mad saint guy · Thu 18 Oct 2007 11:27pm

battye wrote:Even if he was delisted, even if he was in the PSD, even if he was available at our pick... no. We don't need his type.

Elite midfielders with their best years ahead of them?

I wouldn't care if he rips off every taxi mirror in Melbourne if he could play for St Kilda. He is probably the most damaging midfielder in the competition and would make our midfield one of the best in the AFL. The only reason West Coast have a chance of making the finals in 2008 is because Daniel Kerr is still there.

Brian Collis · Thu 18 Oct 2007 11:29pm

Lets rookie him!

plugger66 · Post: # 479087Post **plugger66** » Thu 18 Oct 2007 11:30pm

Brian Collis wrote:Lets rookie him!

No spots left. We went to early on the other guys.

Brian Collis · Thu 18 Oct 2007 11:59pm

plugger66 wrote:
Brian Collis wrote:Lets rookie him!
No spots left. We went to early on the other guys.

Lets delist one more then!

ben_fff · Post: # 479126Post **ben_fff** » Fri 19 Oct 2007 2:22am

mad saint guy wrote:
battye wrote:Even if he was delisted, even if he was in the PSD, even if he was available at our pick... no. We don't need his type.
Elite midfielders with their best years ahead of them?

I wouldn't care if he rips off every taxi mirror in Melbourne if he could play for St Kilda. He is probably the most damaging midfielder in the competition and would make our midfield one of the best in the AFL. The only reason West Coast have a chance of making the finals in 2008 is because Daniel Kerr is still there.

I don't think it would make us one of the best, I think it would make us the best how can you tag Kerr, Dal and Lenny not to mention Harvey and Montagna. For me he's the best player in the competition, when he's at his best he's more damaging then Judd... could only dream of him in the tri colours.

Post: # 479188Post **n1ck** » Fri 19 Oct 2007 11:18am

Of course wed want him.

Would be silly to think with our need for more midfield rotations, to add one of the best 5 midfielders in the competition would be unwarranted?

Daniel Kerr to St.Kilda = Premiership.

saintsRrising · Fri 19 Oct 2007 11:29am

Kerr is a very gifted mid...and a hard nut to boot..

BUT

1/ He is not going anywhere..

2/ and if he did enter the PSD there is no way known he would still be there by our pick.

saintspremiers · Fri 19 Oct 2007 11:37am

saintsRrising wrote:Kerr is a very gifted mid...and a hard nut to boot..

BUT

1/ He is not going anywhere..

2/ and if he did enter the PSD there is no way known he would still be there by our pick.

my point about whether or not he stays at the Eagles is more about IF they can afford to keep any rough diamonds anymore, given the weight of public pressure against the club.....this whole issue surely will effect sponsorship and other things.......sure, Kerr is a champion midfielder, but so was Cousins, plus Judd either cracked the shytes with the Eagles or was just homesick, or a fair bit of both.

The Cancer hasn't been eradicated yet from the Eagles.....I'm hoping more players leave or a forced to leave.

supersaints · Fri 19 Oct 2007 12:32pm

isn't kerr a two striker? Bit risky if you ask me

evertonfc · Post: # 479255Post **evertonfc** » Fri 19 Oct 2007 1:03pm

PSD target?

Garry Lyon: "Let's face it, probably half of the football-watching public, are...well, idiots."

saintsRrising · Fri 19 Oct 2007 1:48pm

saintspremiers wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Kerr is a very gifted mid...and a hard nut to boot..

BUT

1/ He is not going anywhere..

2/ and if he did enter the PSD there is no way known he would still be there by our pick.
my point about whether or not he stays at the Eagles is more about IF they can afford to keep any rough diamonds anymore, given the weight of public pressure against the club.....this whole issue surely will effect sponsorship and other things.......sure, Kerr is a champion midfielder, but so was Cousins, plus Judd either cracked the shytes with the Eagles or was just homesick, or a fair bit of both.

The Cancer hasn't been eradicated yet from the Eagles.....I'm hoping more players leave or a forced to leave.

Well nothing wrong with hoping....

But they have lost Judd and Cousins.....there is no way known that they would let Kerr go.

They had 3 elite mids...now they only have one.

They will not want to have none.

With Cousins and Judd now both gone...the Eagles also have HEAPs of salary cap room.

Would bea great time for Cox and Kerr to ask to have their contracts renegotiated and extended....

Daniel Kerr - PSD target???

Daniel Kerr - PSD target???

Re: Daniel Kerr - PSD target???