Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Doug Booth
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu 19 Oct 2006 6:58pm
Location: Poochera
Been thanked: 5 times

Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876717Post Doug Booth »

Sorry, what a stupid thread!!!!


The dog looked at me !
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876721Post Wayne42 »

They'll have a look, and then move on


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876727Post Mr Magic »

Potential to cause injury?
MRO will find them guilty of rough conduct and fine them each $1500


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876728Post CQ SAINT »

Not a chance


User avatar
Doug Booth
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu 19 Oct 2006 6:58pm
Location: Poochera
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876730Post Doug Booth »

How many indiscretions has Sniper Lynch had this season?


The dog looked at me !
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13291
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 1979 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876761Post The_Dud »

Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876765Post Goose is king »

[quote="Mr Magic" post_id=1876727 time=1602242894 user_id=6583]
Potential to cause injury?
MRO will find them guilty of rough conduct and fine them each $1500
[/quote]

Yep. Knee made contact with head. Could’ve killed him


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22924
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876770Post Teflon »

Won’t even get looked at
Then they’ll come out midweek and say that goal review was a f up but nothing changes


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876778Post shanegrambeau »

Watch Lynch's eyes at contact. He knew what he was doing. Prick!!!!
I want Plugger at the club next year as forward psych coach.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9509
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1209 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876779Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876785Post Mr Magic »

CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876793Post CQ SAINT »

Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:50pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?
Because it was all in the action of the tackle, which is a free kick.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9509
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1209 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876815Post CURLY »

Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:50pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?
Exactly clearly 50. Just another biased shitful display


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9509
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1209 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876817Post CURLY »

CQ SAINT wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:53pm
Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:50pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?
Because it was all in the action of the tackle, which is a free kick.

Incorrect completely incorrect the umpire ignored a clear 50 which would have given us a goal.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13291
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 1979 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876818Post The_Dud »

The umps gave us plenty of shots at goal, we just kept missing them.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876823Post Mr Magic »

CQ SAINT wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:53pm
Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:50pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?
Because it was all in the action of the tackle, which is a free kick.
Sorry,
the free kick was to another player
Cotchin ran in and mugged Jones after the free kick had been paid


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876827Post Mr Magic »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:07pm The umps gave us plenty of shots at goal, we just kept missing them.
Are you serious?
Watch the replay and watch how King is treated compared to Lynch


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9509
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1209 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876834Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:07pm The umps gave us plenty of shots at goal, we just kept missing them.
Gave us two missed the 50 to make it two from twi


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876835Post CQ SAINT »

Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:09pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:53pm
Mr Magic wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:50pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:46pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:38pm Lynch will get a fine.

Cotchin will get nothing.

3rd umpire will correctly get a tick.
Yes your right the AFL will ignore it’s justification a week ago to get Long suspended. What Cotchin did to Jones was far more likely to cause injury than Long. Amazing the umpire 1 meter away missed it.
How was that not a 50m penalty?
Because it was all in the action of the tackle, which is a free kick.
Sorry,
the free kick was to another player
Cotchin ran in and mugged Jones after the free kick had been paid
My bad


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876878Post bigred »

Lynch is a dog.

He's not a hard man.

That effort by Cotchin had intent.

I f****** hate Richmond.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2901
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 260 times
Been thanked: 111 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876884Post bergsone »

Potential to cause injury now isnt it,lets see


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876893Post Mr Magic »

bergsone wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:47pm Potential to cause injury now isnt it,lets see
Only at the Tribunal, not the MRO
That’s how Cotchin gets off
MRO will give him a penalty that he can accept (fine) so it will never have to face the Tribunal test.
Totally unsatisfactory IMHO
and leads fans to suspect that there is an uneven playing field


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876896Post SaintPav »

Wasn’t a bump, unfortunately.

I thought we were a bit hard done by.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12705
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 719 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876904Post Mr Magic »

SaintPav wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 11:52pm Wasn’t a bump, unfortunately.

I thought we were a bit hard done by.
Still illegal contact on Jones
Off the ball
Unduly rough play


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8168
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 1136 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1876916Post Devilhead »

Kent had his back caved in off the ball when Marsh had the ball.for a shot on the boundary - camera csight it beautifully but not one ump saw it or of they did they did nothing about it - should have been 50


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Post Reply