Jarrod Brander

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Bruce G McAbee
Club Player
Posts: 1931
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931504Post Bruce G McAbee »

Just been delisted by the Eagles and is a delisted free agent.
Are we at all interested?


Think of me long enough to make a memory.
User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931510Post diddley »

He is a yes for me.
But he fits in the exact category as Battle.
He doesn’t know where is best position is.
Slightly undersized as a KPP.
But fit enough to be a winger, just not good enough at it.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931515Post Impatient Sainter »

If we do sign Brander, Ratts may finally get the tall wingman he has been craving?


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 682 times
Been thanked: 755 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931517Post Banger9798 »

Is he any good?


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1358 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931518Post cwrcyn »

Terrible foot skills


User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931523Post evertonfc »

diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 1:56pm He is a yes for me.
But he fits in the exact category as Battle.
Definitely similar in parts to Battle. A bit more gangly, he moves more freely than Battle (who was clearly restricted by injuries and sub-optimal conditioning in 2021) but Battle is a more natural footballer.

He's interesting in many ways. This quick video sums him up that he's a bit of a dichotamy:

I can't tell if he's more athlete than footballer, or the other way round. He's a fraction awkward, and a bit slim. And his kicking is a bit hit-and-miss. But he also chooses good, instinctive options. He has a little bit of something but it's hard to tell what. He's had a go up forward and defence, even adding kilos to his frame (https://www.afl.com.au/news/86010/eagle ... nsive-post).

He's an intriguing prospect. I wouldn't be surprised if he made it; a team like Sydney would really back themselves to develop him. But he's also got a lot of development ground to make up. I can see why he was let go.

I wouldn't be averse to bringing him in - possibly even as defensive support as much as a back-up forward. My guess is we won't, arguably given Mason Wood has stuck around and Cooper Sharman has come on.

That said, if we only take three on draft night, we're going to have a lot of list spaces free, and we do need KPP support. They'll be kicking his name around as a possibility.
Last edited by evertonfc on Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:38pm, edited 1 time in total.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
outside66
Club Player
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue 09 May 2017 5:39pm
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 248 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931524Post outside66 »

cwrcyn wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:11pm Terrible foot skills
According to his stats on AFL.COM he goes by 65.7% by foot which is considered above average so not quite sure where you're coming from.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8335
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 163 times
Been thanked: 564 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931525Post Otiman »

A big nope. We already have plenty of others of that type, and have just added another in Sharman.

If we wanted him we could have gotten him for cheap in the trade window, and didn't.


User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6095
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 1047 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931526Post Sainter_Dad »

outside66 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:36pm
cwrcyn wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:11pm Terrible foot skills
According to his stats on AFL.COM he goes by 65.7% by foot which is considered above average so not quite sure where you're coming from.
A chaos kick 40 metres to a contest is an effective disposal - not always considered a good option - but it is a stat
AFL Stat Glossary wrote: A kick of more than 40 metres to a 50/50 contest or better for the team or a kick of less than 40 metres that results in the intended target retaining possession.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931527Post Impatient Sainter »

outside66 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:36pm
cwrcyn wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 3:11pm Terrible foot skills
According to his stats on AFL.COM he goes by 65.7% by foot which is considered above average so not quite sure where you're coming from.
I think its just his kicking action that looks terrible - people make the assumption that he is a poor kick. He actually kicks like a lot of the Irishman that have come to the game late. He is originally from Mildura so you would think he has been playing AFL all his life, but throws the ball in the air and kicks like a soccer goal keeper.

In any event he wants to get to a club where he can play the 3rd tall forward role, which probably counts us out.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3306
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 501 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931534Post older saint »

Dont think so if Battle size, unless coming cheap for depth. Behind Howard, Wilkie, Highmore, Battle.


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931535Post st.byron »

diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 1:56pm He is a yes for me.
But he fits in the exact category as Battle.
He doesn’t know where is best position is.
Slightly undersized as a KPP.
But fit enough to be a winger, just not good enough at it.
Listed on the WCE website as 196cm. Tall enough for a KPD. Battle is 193.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11150
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931537Post B.M »

He’s s***

That’s why he’s been delisted

Don’t think he’s played a decent game at AFL level

Not a KPPs arsehole


st sandy
Club Player
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2011 4:38pm
Location: SANDRINGHAM
Been thanked: 94 times
Contact:

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931554Post st sandy »

Is he more of a key defender?
Difficult to break into the west coast key defensive post with Barass, Sheppard, McGovern, Hurn, ahead of him
If Howard goes down then we will be short in numbers and short in height
Could be useful and only 22


st sandy
Club Player
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2011 4:38pm
Location: SANDRINGHAM
Been thanked: 94 times
Contact:

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931555Post st sandy »

Is he more of a key defender?
Difficult to break into the west coast key defensive post with Barass, Sheppard, McGovern, Hurn, ahead of him
If Howard goes down then we will be short in numbers and short in height
Could be useful and only 22


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16564
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3454 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931556Post skeptic »

Pass


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931558Post Wayne42 »

A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931561Post diddley »

Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2035
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931563Post freely »

B.M wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 5:50pm He’s s***

That’s why he’s been delisted

Don’t think he’s played a decent game at AFL level

Not a KPPs arsehole
Why don't you say what you really think?


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931576Post st.byron »

diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 10:10pm
Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.
Do you mean Constable?


User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931580Post diddley »

st.byron wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 7:45am
diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 10:10pm
Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.
Do you mean Constable?
Yep. That’s the one. Damn spell check.
I honestly believe that if we were to grab all 3 Brander, Constable and Naish, that it would work out for 2 of the 3. Just not sure which 2.


User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931581Post diddley »

diddley wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 9:03am
st.byron wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 7:45am
diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 10:10pm
Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.
Do you mean Constable?
Yep. That’s the one. Damn spell check.
I honestly believe that if we were to grab all 3 Brander, Constable and Naish, that it would work out for 2 of the 3. Just not sure which 2.
Not to mention that the youth dynamic and depth of our midfield group would be shifted instantly along with Pick 9 Windhager and Owens, all at bugger all cost.


User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2615
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931588Post IluvHarvey »

For me there are three questions we need to ask?
1. Does he walk into the best 22?
2. Is he a Back up Key Backman?
3. Is he a Back up Ruckman?

For me these are the three areas we need to look at for any DFA.

The answers are no, no and no.

Pass for me.


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931593Post st.byron »

diddley wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 9:03am
st.byron wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 7:45am
diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 10:10pm
Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.
Do you mean Constable?
Yep. That’s the one. Damn spell check.
I honestly believe that if we were to grab all 3 Brander, Constable and Naish, that it would work out for 2 of the 3. Just not sure which 2.
I think Constable might be worth a shot. Why? Coz I'm an armchair expert........


User avatar
diddley
Club Player
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Jarrod Brander

Post: # 1931598Post diddley »

st.byron wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 11:23am
diddley wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 9:03am
st.byron wrote: Tue 19 Oct 2021 7:45am
diddley wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 10:10pm
Wayne42 wrote: Mon 18 Oct 2021 9:00pm A lot of talls just don't seem to cut it.

Brisbane have delisted Connor Ballenden who is 22yo, 198cm and 96kg.

Same draft as Brander.
Yeah. I think that was a cracking draft in hindsight.
I remember at the time that I didn’t want Brander or Ballenden because I didn’t want a KPP. Happy to grab Brander and Naish as free swing DFA’s though.
We get those 2, and add them to Clark, Coffield, Paton and Higgins (even throw in Constance for good measure), we could rebuild the team solidly from the 1 draft.
Do you mean Constable?
Yep. That’s the one. Damn spell check.
I honestly believe that if we were to grab all 3 Brander, Constable and Naish, that it would work out for 2 of the 3. Just not sure which 2.
I think Constable might be worth a shot. Why? Coz I'm an armchair expert........
Bigging yourself up there mate. An airchair expert! I wouldn’t even consider myself that. I’d be an airchair amateur. Don’t take anything I say on here as the right thing to do.


Post Reply