Saints Average Supercoach Scores

[bergholt]

These provide an interesting look at the performance of the list thus far. Kinda five groups in here, and one guy out in front on his own. Interesting to see some of the changes from last year, especially the drop-offs.

Easily the Stand-Out

123.2: Dal Santo (108.5 last year)

Consistently Good, Sometimes Great

108.1: Goddard (131.5)
105.5: Fisher (94.3)
105.0: McEvoy (63.5)
101.3: Montagna (114.0)

(Though keep in mind that Supercoach points this year over-value hitouts and so ruckmen end up way too high.)

Good But Not Great Years

86.5: Hayes (108.2)
85.7: Riewoldt (107.7)
82.4: Gwilt (78.9)
80.5: Schneider (88.1)

Mostly GOP Mids

78.7: Gilbert (88.8)
78.2: Peake (68.7)
77.3: Steven (62.5)
76.2: Gram (71.3)
75.6: Milne (66.9)
73.5: Jones (81.4)
72.1: Ray (77.2)
71.3: Armitage (69.4)
69.8: Polo (-)

Mostly Defenders

61.5: Koschitzke (55.0)
61.2: Gamble (-)
61.0: Simpkin (-)
59.1: Dempster (58.9)
58.3: Blake (71.0)
56.3: Dawson (54.3)
54.6: Clarke (68.0)
53.3: Lynch (10.0)
52.0: Archer (-)
51.3: Baker (59.7)

Mostly Kids

45.2: McQualter (59.4)
44.6: Siposs (-)
41.7: Smith (-)
31.0: Stanley (47.6)
30.0: Cripps (-)
20.5: Winmar (-)
20.0: Ledger (-)
19.0: Geary (67.4)
14.0: Johnson (-)

[stkildathunda]

Compare those to the other teams though and you'll find averages have dropped across the board.. Changes in way points are rewarded have affected scoring eg forwards like Riewoldt & Brown...

Also your probably best to look at them in two halfs. From Rounds 1-10 & Rounds 11-19 to see what the differences are when we are winning and losing... think you'll be suprised at the differences

[saintDal]

I would say McEvoys high scoring is more due to his contested marking than rucking.

[milney044]

Not surprised about Dal. The Brownlow will be interesting this year, you'd think Judd would have it in the bag at this stage but Dal tends to poll pretty well.

[jays]

dal in great form

[Thinline]

dal in great form

563 posts and I reckon not a single one has gone beyond a line in length.

I admire your brevity!

[bergholt]

Also your probably best to look at them in two halfs. From Rounds 1-10 & Rounds 11-19 to see what the differences are when we are winning and losing... think you'll be suprised at the differences

fair point.

that leaves us with 23 players who played more than one before round 11 and more than one after. this is the percentage difference in average supercoach score:

+72% Gamble (41 - 70)
+48% Koschitzke (50 - 74)
+38% Steven (64 - 89)
+36% Clarke (45 - 60)
+33% McEvoy (90 - 120)
+27% Dal Santo (109 - 139)
+26% Peake (67 - 85)
+21% Milne (69 - 83)
+20% Jones (67 - 81)
+18% Goddard (100 - 118)
+14% Gwilt (78 - 89)

+12% Polo (65 - 72)
+7% Gram (74 - 79)
+6% Ray (70 - 74)
+0% Baker (51 - 51)
-3% Riewoldt (87 - 84)
-6% Fisher (108 - 102)
-7% Schneider (84 - 78)
-7% Dawson (59 - 54)
-8% Gilbert (82 - 75)
-10% Montagna (106 - 96)
-13% Dempster (63 - 55)

-37% Armitage (86 - 54)

interesting list. most have improved. joey and chips can be forgiven for appearing in the bottom half because they kept us afloat in the early part of the year. definitely a disappointing year thus far for riewoldt, schneider and gilbert. dawson and dempster defenders so not much to read into that.

armitage the interesting one. he would have been happy going out in 86, but since then has been pushed out of the midfield (?) and is coming back in 54.

[borderbarry]

A big bearing in the downgrade of some players would be the new sub rule. If a player has been the sub a few times and onlt\y had limited game time, such as Raph with 13 minutes in one match, his score is going to be greatly reduced.

[Rosco]

Not surprised about Dal. The Brownlow will be interesting this year, you'd think Judd would have it in the bag at this stage but Dal tends to poll pretty well.

on the brownlow, you'd think dal will poll 2 or 3 in most of our wins and we have had a few now. will give the field a big head start but if he can get his current form going for the last 5 rounds he is a show, history shows that the umpires have a soft spot for him. plus no hayes to take votes from him.

judd is very good though, murphy will take votes but they will get plenty between them. if i was betting i'd have those two in the top 5 with dal.

[matrix]

judd then dal
im getting on that for the top two