Saints delistings

thirty-seven!? · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:13pm

Ryan Gamble
Al Smith
Nick Heyne
Will Johnson
Paul Cahill...

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.

skeptic · Post: # 1168837Post **skeptic** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:14pm

source?

would be very disappointed to see Johnson go

Con Gorozidis · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:15pm

harsh. but believable.
so johnson/walsh/lynch/cahil gone.

thats 4 young guys over 190cm .

our kpp stocks are very very low!

savatage · Post: # 1168843Post **savatage** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:19pm

thirty-seven!? wrote:Ryan Gamble - Correct
Al Smith - I thought he had a bit of talent...oh well sh1t happens....
Nick Heyne - Correct
Will Johnson - Tries hard but this one is probably correct...
Paul Cahill... - Correct

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.

SaintPav · Post: # 1168844Post **SaintPav** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:20pm

2008 draft was a disaster.

plugger66 · Post: # 1168845Post **plugger66** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:21pm

SaintPav wrote:2008 draft was a disaster.

Yep.

defacto · Post: # 1168846Post **defacto** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:21pm

holy crap.

St.Kilda have delisted Ryan Gamble, Nick Heyne, Will Johnson, Paul Cahill and Alistair Smith.

didnt see the ones in bold staring down the gun.

shmic_s · Post: # 1168847Post **shmic_s** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:23pm

Not surprised, but i had one of Cahill or Johnson staying.

Heyne to be rookied?

saintly · Post: # 1168849Post **saintly** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:24pm

thirty-seven!? wrote:Ryan Gamble
Al Smith
Nick Heyne
Will Johnson
Paul Cahill...

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.

how does any of this help the salary cap?

saintlee · Post: # 1168850Post **saintlee** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:25pm

Most of those are list-cloggers IMO.

Only one I think is unlucky is Smith...

Con Gorozidis · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:26pm

defacto wrote:holy crap.

St.Kilda have delisted Ryan Gamble, Nick Heyne, Will Johnson, Paul Cahill and Alistair Smith.

didnt see the ones in bold staring down the gun.

will johnson never got a fair chance.

saintlee · Post: # 1168852Post **saintlee** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:26pm

saintly wrote:
thirty-seven!? wrote:Ryan Gamble
Al Smith
Nick Heyne
Will Johnson
Paul Cahill...

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.
how does any of this help the salary cap?

Maybe the salary cap issue is not that bad...also, there could be more delistings...

saintly · Post: # 1168854Post **saintly** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:27pm

thirty-seven!? wrote:Ryan Gamble
Al Smith
Nick Heyne
Will Johnson
Paul Cahill...

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.

nick heyne still has a year to go on his contract? doesn't he?

Hurricane · Post: # 1168855Post **Hurricane** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:27pm

Only one that shocks me a bit is Smith, thaught he was ok.

But I cant actually find the media statement on this one.

HS, Age and Saints website have no story listed.

Whats the source?

BANG BANG

plugger66 · Post: # 1168856Post **plugger66** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:28pm

saintlee wrote:
saintly wrote:
thirty-seven!? wrote:Ryan Gamble
Al Smith
Nick Heyne
Will Johnson
Paul Cahill...

All youth... Surpring and somewhat worrying. Shame to see Smith go IMO. Will get picked up by another club.
how does any of this help the salary cap?
Maybe the salary cap issue is not that bad...also, there could be more delistings...

I reckon that last part of your statement is right. One of the mid range players will be delisted or work. Could even be 2.

dragit · Post: # 1168860Post **dragit** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:31pm

This could mean that the 'other' un-contracted players have a agreed to new terms on lower wages? - or notâ€¦

Ironic that we have been screaming out for more (bigger) forwards yet have lost 6 so farâ€¦ No point keeping those that aren't good enough I suppose, makes you wonder if Lynch was due for more game time had he of stayed.

Johnson was the only one I thought could have stepped up, maybe a rookie for him and Heyne (contractually obliged)

To The Top - You'll be gutted about Cahill instead of Gears?

defacto · Post: # 1168861Post **defacto** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:33pm

i am hoping like hell we rookie list johnson and smith.

saintbrat · Post: # 1168863Post **saintbrat** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:35pm

Nothing listed 'officially' anywhere yet.

skeptic · Post: # 1168865Post **skeptic** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:36pm

Smith and Johnson both reported to have a little something throughout the season the 2s...

never got a shot

the list of players delisted/lost without being properly tested goes on

elvis lives · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:36pm

heaven help us if we get any medium/long term injuries to our starting 18 KPP. we will be absolutely screwed. Not to mention we only have one realistic ruck option in McEvoy. Talk about having a dozen eggs in the Stanley basket.

can only aassume we will be adopting a sheedy-esque mosquito fleet around the ground.

plugger66 · Post: # 1168867Post **plugger66** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:38pm

skeptic wrote:Smith and Johnson both reported to have a little something throughout the season the 2s...

never got a shot

the list of players delisted/lost without being properly tested goes on

So whose fault is that. Surely if Pechan or Watters thought they were good enough they would have stayed and anyway who are these delisted players that have been let go without being tested?

mad saint guy · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:40pm

I'm disappointed but not surprised on Smith and Johnson. Surely this means Archer stays and therefore is elevated

thirty-seven!? · Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:41pm

Source is Jonno Nash, one of the reporters for Croc Media. Apologies if this has jumped the gun, but seemed confident it was official.

Surely club announcement is imminent

plugger66 · Post: # 1168870Post **plugger66** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:42pm

mad saint guy wrote:I'm disappointed but not surprised on Smith and Johnson. Surely this means Archer stays and therefore is elevated

Well he doesnt deserve to be elevated. Second half of the year was poor. To be honest he would be very lucky to stay on the rookie list.

saintbrat · Post: # 1168875Post **saintbrat** » Mon 24 Oct 2011 2:45pm

thirty-seven!? wrote:Source is Jonno Nash, one of the reporters for Croc Media. Apologies if this has jumped the gun, but seemed confident it was official.

Surely club announcement is imminent

nothing yet

is that the Jonno Nash that used to play VFL?- or does he still?

Saints delistings

Saints delistings

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL

Re: Saints delistings - OFFICIAL