More BS for milney/montagna

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4276
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 235 times

More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213737Post mr six o'clock »

Did I hear right !
Are they going to be drag through the mud again ?
I hope not .


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213739Post saintbrat »

Rita Panahi‏@RitaPanahi

OPI highly critical of way Milne & Montagna case was handled by police. Has ordered review of evidence. Via @9newsmelb


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
User avatar
PaytonPlace
Club Player
Posts: 496
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2011 8:31pm

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213740Post PaytonPlace »



You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213741Post clarky449 »

Ah well, if they find it neccessary then i can understand that. If something was tampered with as such and they find it did actually take place then hopefully both players/player dont get away with it.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
User avatar
Johnny Member
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213749Post Johnny Member »

I think they're reviewing the way the way the police handled it - not the actual evidence or the case itself.


User avatar
Furphy
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
Location: Berwick
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213784Post Furphy »

clarky449 wrote:Ah well, if they find it neccessary then i can understand that. If something was tampered with as such and they find it did actually take place then hopefully both players/player dont get away with it.
Get away with what? This is yet another media beat-up to once again drag Milney's name through the mud & vindicate outragous comments made by a former coach 2 years ago. What next, another sory about Jim O'Dea? The issue just happens to brought up just after Milney kicks his 500th goal, what a coincidence!
Last edited by Furphy on Thu 03 May 2012 10:28am, edited 1 time in total.


I Love Peter Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1717
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:18am
Location: Noble Park

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213793Post I Love Peter Kiel »

It doesn't stop the Collingwood Newsletter (HS) putting our club crest and colours on the front page again!

Is it mere coincidence that they've done this on the day it comes out the 'squeaky clean, green' Chris Judd has made a fortune out of a pokies company?

Or that this week we have a big game against the Hawks?

No doubt there'll be continuing slander against Milney in contrast with Hodge, Buddy etc.

Yes, Buddy is a pillar of society!

I am friggin' sick of hypocritical journos getting their jollies from this!


In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213821Post matrix »

maybe they should start talking about the big name (s) on 3 strikes thats supposedly been covered up due to people going into meltdown about the superstar(s)


Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213839Post Thinline »

matrix wrote:maybe they should start talking about the big name (s) on 3 strikes thats supposedly been covered up due to people going into meltdown about the superstar(s)
That's a bit of an oldie isn't Matrix?

I'm simply staggered at the way this whole thing is reported. I couldn't be bothered going into it any deeper that that.


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
milney044
Club Player
Posts: 1704
Joined: Fri 31 Mar 2006 9:20pm
Location: Level 1, next to the race -social club
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: More BS for milney/montagna

Post: # 1213842Post milney044 »

It's unbelievable the way the media can beat up a story. I'm more concerned for Milne's kids, particularly his son who is now 10 and will no doubt have kids at school who will have their "say", not to mention he's old enough now to know what the "R' word means and I just don't think this is fair on his family for this to be brought into the public once again, especially when it relates to the police and not Milne directly.

I can't stand the media, particularly the Sun. It's things like this that mean both the players and said female involved can never move on from this and I find the story pretty insensitive on their behalf.


Image
Destiny. It's in our hands.

Harder. Better. Faster. Stronger.
Post Reply