Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Apparently just announced. We move up a spot.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
No we have 24 25 41 44 77 91 i am pretty suresavatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
think you will find the first three are 24,25, and 40slider wrote:I am wrong as well we now have 24 25 41 44 76 and 90
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Have the pricks been banned from using them as they should be?
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
savatage wrote:Should I just re-quote myself?
I think you should.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Do whatever you want its a free worldsavatage wrote:Should I just re-quote myself?
So its 24, 25, 40, 43, 75 and 90 you win
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Serious? WTF!! maybe i should a smiley on itsavatage wrote:Wow, so serious. Brighten up a bit!
You ok now?
-
vacuous space
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Is the Dunell pick 90? I thought it would move up a spot.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
I'm always OK & I raise you withslider wrote:Serious? WTF!! maybe i should a smiley on itsavatage wrote:Wow, so serious. Brighten up a bit!
You ok now?
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
This guy is right, who says this guy is right...savatage wrote:This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
-
dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
What about minus the father son's... ?
I also hope Tippex takes up an early pick for someone, it would suck if he gets to Sydney via free agency...
I also hope Tippex takes up an early pick for someone, it would suck if he gets to Sydney via free agency...
Last edited by dragit on Wed 21 Nov 2012 7:43pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10696
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 804 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Kurt Tippett is expected to be refused access to the draft with Adelaide and him forced to remain marreid for next year.
This puts Adelaide into severe salary cap problems.
One way of reducing the problem that was used by St Kilda was to go into the season with 38 or 39 senior players instead of 40.
Surrendering picks 20 and 54 really only hurts with pick 20.
They may use pick 62 but don't expect them to use 80 and 95 (yesterday 81 and 96)
This puts Adelaide into severe salary cap problems.
One way of reducing the problem that was used by St Kilda was to go into the season with 38 or 39 senior players instead of 40.
Surrendering picks 20 and 54 really only hurts with pick 20.
They may use pick 62 but don't expect them to use 80 and 95 (yesterday 81 and 96)
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16584
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3478 times
- Been thanked: 2741 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
savatage wrote:This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
note to self
these guys know what they're talking about
-
Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
This guy is left.savatage wrote:This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
-
Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
The REAL story here is; WHY DID ADELAIDE OFFER TO GIVE UP THEIR FIRST TWO PICKS IN THIS YEAR'S DRAFT? You don't have to be all that bright to work out that they will be giving up Pick 20 and Pick 50 something this year where as they would be giving up picks 10 & 28 next year. All they are doing is trying everything they can to lessen the impact caused by their DISHONESTY. Let's hope that the AFL sees through this SCAM !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18576
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1534 times
- Been thanked: 1882 times
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
So we would have given up picks 24 and 25 for Mitch Brown. Bargain!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Will they still be forced to use 3 picks in the draft?
Maybe this year?
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
Dr Spaceman wrote:This guy is left.savatage wrote:This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
This guy has the right sign
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
Stillwaiting
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
I think the first guy is wrong about the first guy being rightDr Spaceman wrote:This guy is left.savatage wrote:This guy is right.savatage wrote:Yep, we now have 24, 25, 40, 43, 75.
I love this club
Re: Crows not using first 2 draft picks
It's quite bizarre how they r trying to be so proactive. As if a thief starts his sentence at home before trial. It does not show contrition , it shows that they are still trying to control things in the same way as they did with Tippett. This is still outside their control as they are a club not the afl. They can not continue to give themselves new rules and their own punishment.
The afl should say u gave up your picks this year , as your own choice. The penalty we give you will still be unaffected and not lessened the next two years.
The afl should say u gave up your picks this year , as your own choice. The penalty we give you will still be unaffected and not lessened the next two years.