Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351089Post Cairnsman »

If it all turns pair shaped for the Bombers would we be awarded the 4 points from the Bombers game thus artificially strengthening our ladder position and denying us a pick 3?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351090Post plugger66 »

Doubt they will lose points. If found guilty they will just suspend the players and fine the club plenty of money. may also lose draft picks even though I doubt. reckon no hope of losing points for games already played. Anyway it will only effect sides who play them twice if that did happen or sides they lost to. doubt anyone is near us in that situation.
Last edited by plugger66 on Tue 25 Jun 2013 8:44pm, edited 1 time in total.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351091Post saintspremiers »

Cairnsman wrote:If it all turns pair shaped for the Bombers would we be awarded the 4 points from the Bombers game thus artificially strengthening our ladder position and denying us a pick 3?
Possibly, but other teams would get 4 points also that they beat.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351095Post bigcarl »

Cairnsman wrote:If it all turns pair shaped for the Bombers would we be awarded the 4 points from the Bombers game thus artificially strengthening our ladder position and denying us a pick 3?
They'll lose points and draft picks IMO. There has to be a penalty.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351106Post CURLY »

Would Essendon really care if they lost draft picks? They'll trade some excess talls for what they lose and still have the two years extra development in the young group through cheating.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Megamaguire
Club Player
Posts: 1365
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:40pm
Location: Mitcham

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351110Post Megamaguire »

They already cost us a valuable pick (was it Pick 16 - Nat Draft?) for their cast off player who didn't actually register a game with the Saints.
Annoyingly they were aided and abetted by K. Sheedy in closing the deal.
Could they damage ST. Kilda's efforts at rebuilding - I don't see why not!

HANG IN THERE SAINTS!


The boy can play and we can build a defence around him that will have respect.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351112Post samuraisaint »

But if we get our four points back, then so will everybody else they've beaten. Anyway, never happen. After what Watson said last night, if they get found guilty they will cop a lot more than just losing match points.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351130Post gringo »

It will still be in court when Milney is well and truly finished his career and seen off his court case. They will try to amend the 2012 season records give them a fine. Hird and all the no nothings will still be there and they will give 6 months to all the players involved after round 23 or later if the bombers make finals. They should be back for the start of 2014 just no able to train at the club.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351149Post Wayne42 »

I wish this long drawn out banned substance process would end so that we didn't have to speculate on the punishment, we could laugh instead.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351189Post defacto »

Cairnsman wrote:If it all turns pair shaped for the Bombers would we be awarded the 4 points from the Bombers game thus artificially strengthening our ladder position and denying us a pick 3?
they would be penalised points, teams that faced them would not be awarded points, as its not possible in an uneven draw


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10344
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 688 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351199Post desertsaint »

Jove should lose his brownlow. Essendon all points this season. All players on the juice suspended for next season.
The problem comes because some teams play them twice. The fairest would be to award all teams points for the first meeting, and the game outcome for the second - but if they beat them the first time they should get the points for both games. Not ideal, but how else?


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351206Post groupie1 »

saintspremiers wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:If it all turns pair shaped for the Bombers would we be awarded the 4 points from the Bombers game thus artificially strengthening our ladder position and denying us a pick 3?
Possibly, but other teams would get 4 points also that they beat.
Surely the Dons just get stripped of points in that scenario. The points don't then go to the teams they beat. The points just disappear. Yes?


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
Hurricane
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4038
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351209Post Hurricane »

When the Melbourne Storm got stung for the salary cap they lost all their points but the teams they beat didn't get those points back. They just fell into a black hole. They surely wouldn't figure in the draft if that happens to them (and I think it should)

BANG BANG


Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.

I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN

I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351212Post saintspremiers »

Hurricane wrote:When the Melbourne Storm got stung for the salary cap they lost all their points but the teams they beat didn't get those points back. They just fell into a black hole. They surely wouldn't figure in the draft if that happens to them (and I think it should)

BANG BANG
I could never envisage the AFL of stripping all points or any for that matter. It will be either draft pick penalties, fines or player suspensions.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351217Post Old Mate »

plugger66 wrote:Doubt they will lose points. If found guilty they will just suspend the players and fine the club plenty of money. may also lose draft picks even though I doubt. reckon no hope of losing points for games already played. Anyway it will only effect sides who play them twice if that did happen or sides they lost to. doubt anyone is near us in that situation.
When athletes have been sanctioned in the past we've seen their awards, medals, wins etc taken away from them. Assuming multiple Essendon players are charged I see the club being charged as a sporting organisation not as the individual players and because of this I suspect every win over the doping period will be taken away from them. I also suspect draft penalties will apply because no way do they lose all points this year finishing 18th and receive pick 1 in the National Draft. I suspect it'll be similar to the Storm where they lose points however the other teams don't get wins for the games they played against them. If we are looking at past case law with WADA then I see no alternative.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351218Post plugger66 »

Old Mate wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Doubt they will lose points. If found guilty they will just suspend the players and fine the club plenty of money. may also lose draft picks even though I doubt. reckon no hope of losing points for games already played. Anyway it will only effect sides who play them twice if that did happen or sides they lost to. doubt anyone is near us in that situation.
When athletes have been sanctioned in the past we've seen their awards, medals, wins etc taken away from them. Assuming multiple Essendon players are charged I see the club being charged as a sporting organisation not as the individual players and because of this I suspect every win over the doping period will be taken away from them. I also suspect draft penalties will apply because no way do they lose all points this year finishing 18th and receive pick 1 in the National Draft. I suspect it'll be similar to the Storm where they lose points however the other teams don't get wins for the games they played against them. If we are looking at past case law with WADA then I see no alternative.

So what is the period. last year and this year or just last year when they have admitted use. They wont lose points for this year. Not a hope IMO. And as you say even if they did no one will get them. And ASADA wont be involved in this. Im sure that will be an AFL decision. Happy for me to show me where a team has lost points or something similar.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351221Post Old Mate »

Plugger the reason why longterm suspensions are handed down as sanctions is to get players out of competition who have a lasting performance enhancement from their substance use. Which leads me to my next statement; They used gear last year but will still reap the benefits this year.

I suspect the penalty of loss of wins, medals etc will apply for the period they admitted to taking AOD (end of 2011 I think) until when the sanctions are given (which will likely be mid Aug). Anything and everything that Essendon won in that period will be stripped IMO, including Jobe's Charlie.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351250Post st_Trav_ofWA »

if they were to strip them of points i doubt they would give point to the other teams ... i think essendon would just go back to 0 points


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351354Post plugger66 »

Old Mate wrote:Plugger the reason why longterm suspensions are handed down as sanctions is to get players out of competition who have a lasting performance enhancement from their substance use. Which leads me to my next statement; They used gear last year but will still reap the benefits this year.

I suspect the penalty of loss of wins, medals etc will apply for the period they admitted to taking AOD (end of 2011 I think) until when the sanctions are given (which will likely be mid Aug). Anything and everything that Essendon won in that period will be stripped IMO, including Jobe's Charlie.

And if they are 5th or 6th this year when they strip the points then whats the penalty? They cant win the flag from there anyway so big deal they finish last. If they are to take points off essendon the only real penalty is next year not this or last year. And I reckon people get 2 years because that is the penalty and its not to get stuff out of the system.


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1351459Post savatage »

Old Mate wrote:Plugger the reason why longterm suspensions are handed down as sanctions is to get players out of competition who have a lasting performance enhancement from their substance use.
Unfortunately the enhancements could last for as long as they keep training hard.

If the supplements have got them over a certain plateau - then they'll keep going and adding strength & more size with time.

Pretty much any body builder that was on the juice would be able to attest to this.


Heidelberg_Saint
Club Player
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 9:32pm
Location: Heidelberg, Vic

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1352184Post Heidelberg_Saint »

I'm not asking for much but I hope for the following:
* 2013 points reduced to zero and Bombers awarded the wooden spoon;
* no draft selections until Round 5;
* fine them $15 mil;
* club goes bankrupt;
* BJ rejoins the Saints on the minimum wage.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Could the Bombers cost us pick 3

Post: # 1352201Post Wayne42 »

One thing that has been made clear, any suspension does not mean they miss just the pre season, they must miss games in a season proper, that would
have rattled them momentarily, until Dimwit phoned them and told them to relax .


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Post Reply