Garlett

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Locked
whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4514
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Garlett

Post: # 1436026Post whiskers3614 »

Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6516
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436028Post ausfatcat »

whiskers3614 wrote:Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?

what happened?


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4514
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436029Post whiskers3614 »

Given leave
will continue to train but not play
Not coping with pressure of AFL.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436034Post Con Gorozidis »

whiskers3614 wrote:Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?
I seriously hope you arent one of those blokes waiting for an indigenous kids to fail so you can say 'i told you so'.

Hes only been in the system 12 weeks.
Hes still training (the season hasnt even started)
All the Hawks players are supporting him.
FFS. Get off his back.
Still a very good chance he will work out for them because they will go on providing support.

I guess youd pull the rug out as soon as you got a chance.


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4514
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436038Post whiskers3614 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
whiskers3614 wrote:Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?
I seriously hope you arent one of those blokes waiting for an indigenous kids to fail so you can say 'i told you so'.

Hes only been in the system 12 weeks.
Hes still training (the season hasnt even started)
All the Hawks players are supporting him.
FFS. Get off his back.
Still a very good chance he will work out for them because they will go on providing support.

I guess youd pull the rug out as soon as you got a chance.
Not at all.
Where we are at the moment we cannot afford troubled souls.
I also opposed those who wanted Fevola,
last time I looked he was white!


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436053Post plugger66 »

whiskers3614 wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
whiskers3614 wrote:Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?
I seriously hope you arent one of those blokes waiting for an indigenous kids to fail so you can say 'i told you so'.

Hes only been in the system 12 weeks.
Hes still training (the season hasnt even started)
All the Hawks players are supporting him.
FFS. Get off his back.
Still a very good chance he will work out for them because they will go on providing support.

I guess youd pull the rug out as soon as you got a chance.
Not at all.
Where we are at the moment we cannot afford troubled souls.
I also opposed those who wanted Fevola,
last time I looked he was white!

You have nailed it. We, being a bottom side and with all the crap over the last few years, couldnt take a punt on garlett. That was obvious. Hope he makes it but even this would be headline news for a bottom club like us. To Hawthorn it may or may not just be another failed draft pick.


User avatar
mightysainters
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436106Post mightysainters »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
whiskers3614 wrote:Where are all the posters who wanted us to take him in the draft?
I seriously hope you arent one of those blokes waiting for an indigenous kids to fail so you can say 'i told you so'.

Hes only been in the system 12 weeks.
Hes still training (the season hasnt even started)
All the Hawks players are supporting him.
FFS. Get off his back.
Still a very good chance he will work out for them because they will go on providing support.

I guess youd pull the rug out as soon as you got a chance.
wtf does his race have anything to do with it? Why are people so quick to play the race card?!

He had a history of priors... as did Fevola, as did Lovett, as did Lawrence Angwin etc... it rarely works out well...


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436111Post dragit »

Nothing against the young man… hope his life settles well,

But on top of losing Franklin, Hawthorn gave us 2 first round draft picks for McEvoy, the pressure will be on to grab another flag in the next 2 years… Hodge, Mitchell, Sewell, Gibson, Lake, Burgoyne, Hale, all on their way out.

I guess you can take big risks without much scrutiny when you win flags... :x


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436265Post White Winmar »

The boy will be a star, if he gets the off field right. I've seen a bit of him at junior and senior(WAFL) levels. I was hoping we'd take a punt on him, but I now realise that was folly because we probably don't have the structures that would turn him around. He's a gigantic talent. I hope he makes it. If he doesn't, it will be another story of wasted indigenous talent.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436270Post BigMart »

Michael Walters also got a leave of absense.... As did Harley Bennell

What was the risk?

Really, if he didn't make it, for whatever reason....He'd be no different to 10 guys we selected from 2008-2012... Not counting Rookies

The thing he had in his corner.... The fact there was zero chance he would fall short on talent.... Unlike most draftees... Inc top ten pick... Always a risk they will fall short on some aspect


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436273Post dragit »

BigMart wrote:Michael Walters also got a leave of absense.... As did Harley Bennell

What was the risk?

Really, if he didn't make it, for whatever reason....He'd be no different to 10 guys we selected from 2008-2012... Not counting Rookies

The thing he had in his corner.... The fact there was zero chance he would fall short on talent.... Unlike most draftees... Inc top ten pick... Always a risk they will fall short on some aspect
Dear lord.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436274Post plugger66 »

BigMart wrote:Michael Walters also got a leave of absense.... As did Harley Bennell

What was the risk?

Really, if he didn't make it, for whatever reason....He'd be no different to 10 guys we selected from 2008-2012... Not counting Rookies

The thing he had in his corner.... The fact there was zero chance he would fall short on talent.... Unlike most draftees... Inc top ten pick... Always a risk they will fall short on some aspect

The risk is we have had enough bad publicity to last a life time. It is quite obvious the club dont need anymore. It was the right decision as we had more to lose than Hawthorn. It looks like most clubs saw the same problems.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436277Post BigMart »

Is that too hard for you to understand....

Hawthorn took a positive risk... It will be little skin off their nose... In fact a courageous call...

Collingwood did with Krakour, and of course there are many other examples....

AL will no doubt be bought up?! To me that's different
The intelligence suggested he was a ridiculous risk, for what we gave up? Risk is not about the player, it's about what the cost is?

If he caused issues, any negative publicity would be expected... But I think the individual would look worse than the club TRYING to give him a chance.

I would have drafted Garlett, without a problem in 2012... As soon as he slipped to the RD.... And in 2013 I would have just missed out, as I would have spent a third rounder on him... I think that was beyond what he actually got drafted at

Manson.... Would have also been a rookie n 2013 if I was recruiting.... But only been at the club part time... And given a couple of years to integrate to city life.

To get ahead, you need to take some risks (especially with expansion concessions) eite talent was unavailable unless you took a risk on it


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1436287Post plugger66 »

BigMart wrote:Is that too hard for you to understand....

Hawthorn took a positive risk... It will be little skin off their nose... In fact a courageous call...

Collingwood did with Krakour, and of course there are many other examples....

AL will no doubt be bought up?! To me that's different
The intelligence suggested he was a ridiculous risk, for what we gave up? Risk is not about the player, it's about what the cost is?

If he caused issues, any negative publicity would be expected... But I think the individual would look worse than the club TRYING to give him a chance.

I would have drafted Garlett, without a problem in 2012... As soon as he slipped to the RD.... And in 2013 I would have just missed out, as I would have spent a third rounder on him... I think that was beyond what he actually got drafted at

Manson.... Would have also been a rookie n 2013 if I was recruiting.... But only been at the club part time... And given a couple of years to integrate to city life.

To get ahead, you need to take some risks (especially with expansion concessions) eite talent was unavailable unless you took a risk on it

So you are reading me again. Interesting. The clubs that draft these players have two things we dont have. Money and huge amounts to help these kids. Probably have minders as well. And secondly they are or were much closer to a flag than we will be for maybe 6-8 years. The club made a correct decision even before this happened. Now it looks even more correct if something can be more correct. To argue otherwise is just argueing for either the sake of it or to do what you do best and say the club was wrong again.

And you also would have a part time player. Now ive heard everything. That would be more ridicule for our club.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437175Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Mr hinesight strikes again .....
so lets get this straight

worth the risk that the saints were fools for not taking:
Garlett
Cousins
Krakour

bad risks that were obvious to you at the time but only voiced after the time:
Lovett
Cripps
Ledger


to look at things really basically it seems the saints are damned if the do and damned if they dont when it comes to you ...


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437211Post defacto »

BigMart wrote:Is that too hard for you to understand....

Hawthorn took a positive risk... It will be little skin off their nose... In fact a courageous call...

Collingwood did with Krakour, and of course there are many other examples....

AL will no doubt be bought up?! To me that's different
The intelligence suggested he was a ridiculous risk, for what we gave up? Risk is not about the player, it's about what the cost is?

If he caused issues, any negative publicity would be expected... But I think the individual would look worse than the club TRYING to give him a chance.

I would have drafted Garlett, without a problem in 2012... As soon as he slipped to the RD.... And in 2013 I would have just missed out, as I would have spent a third rounder on him... I think that was beyond what he actually got drafted at

Manson.... Would have also been a rookie n 2013 if I was recruiting.... But only been at the club part time... And given a couple of years to integrate to city life.

To get ahead, you need to take some risks (especially with expansion concessions) eite talent was unavailable unless you took a risk on it
you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about RE: garlett


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437213Post gringo »

It looks as if we dodged a bullet in hindsight but he is very talented. I hope he gets it together because he was always high risk high reward.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16614
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3489 times
Been thanked: 2755 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437236Post skeptic »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote: Lovett
Cripps
Ledger


to look at things really basically it seems the saints are damned if the do and damned if they dont when it comes to you ...
In fairness to Mart, he was very vocal in his criticism of the Lovett trade pretty much from day dot

Don't remember the Ledger one


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437242Post Con Gorozidis »

Garlett is only just 20.
He hasnt actually done anything wrong - hes just not playing in the pre-season. Big whoops.
The season hasnt even started and his club and his team-mates are supporting him.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7823
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 559 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437245Post magnifisaint »

skeptic wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote: Lovett
Cripps
Ledger


to look at things really basically it seems the saints are damned if the do and damned if they dont when it comes to you ...
In fairness to Mart, he was very vocal in his criticism of the Lovett trade pretty much from day dot

Don't remember the Ledger one
Who's he?


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437252Post Con Gorozidis »

BigMart wrote:Michael Walters also got a leave of absense.... As did Harley Bennell
M Walters is an absolute gun - that has to be put down to a big win for R Lyon. Went from career cross-roads to top 50 players in the comp.


Freebird
Club Player
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437256Post Freebird »

plugger66 wrote:
BigMart wrote:Is that too hard for you to understand....

Hawthorn took a positive risk... It will be little skin off their nose... In fact a courageous call...

Collingwood did with Krakour, and of course there are many other examples....

AL will no doubt be bought up?! To me that's different
The intelligence suggested he was a ridiculous risk, for what we gave up? Risk is not about the player, it's about what the cost is?

If he caused issues, any negative publicity would be expected... But I think the individual would look worse than the club TRYING to give him a chance.

I would have drafted Garlett, without a problem in 2012... As soon as he slipped to the RD.... And in 2013 I would have just missed out, as I would have spent a third rounder on him... I think that was beyond what he actually got drafted at

Manson.... Would have also been a rookie n 2013 if I was recruiting.... But only been at the club part time... And given a couple of years to integrate to city life.

To get ahead, you need to take some risks (especially with expansion concessions) eite talent was unavailable unless you took a risk on it

So you are reading me again. Interesting. The clubs that draft these players have two things we dont have. Money and huge amounts to help these kids. Probably have minders as well. And secondly they are or were much closer to a flag than we will be for maybe 6-8 years. The club made a correct decision even before this happened. Now it looks even more correct if something can be more correct. To argue otherwise is just argueing for either the sake of it or to do what you do best and say the club was wrong again.

And you also would have a part time player. Now ive heard everything. That would be more ridicule for our club.
You are so easy to read tugger...no need to look for moron posting when its yours

<Warning for abuse / baiting. Name calling qualifies under both.>


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437264Post defacto »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Garlett is only just 20.
He hasnt actually done anything wrong - hes just not playing in the pre-season. Big whoops.
The season hasnt even started and his club and his team-mates are supporting him.
sounds like the defence eagles supporters dished up on cousins late 90s to early 00s


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437291Post The Redeemer »

defacto wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Garlett is only just 20.
He hasnt actually done anything wrong - hes just not playing in the pre-season. Big whoops.
The season hasnt even started and his club and his team-mates are supporting him.
sounds like the defence eagles supporters dished up on cousins late 90s to early 00s
I do not look for upstanding citizens in footballers.

Cousins was an amazing player. The end.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Garlett

Post: # 1437326Post BigMart »

Trav

Some clear Bulldust there and you know it

I was attacked by usual s for voicing my opinion on Cripps ATT... For not giving him a chance...mmm, hindsight?
Same for Lovett.... Very Vocal on that and attacked
Very vocal on Ball ATT before he succeeded at Collingwood, blind freddy could have sen that coming
Cousins ATT made comment
Sweeney ATT
Howard ATT
Krakour.... Never mentioned drafting him, did use him as example of a positive risk Collingwood took...
Ledger, a lie.... Huge supporter of him... Up until he got delisted

I think you need to get your facts straight....

I have had many ideas over the years, admitted to.... That would have been total disasters?!
I have lauded some great work... Particularly of Baines.

Very inaccurate, selective posting


Locked