Modern Footy

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Modern Footy

Post: # 1599548Post Con Gorozidis »

So the Hawks:

lost clearances by 35%
lost stoppages by 28%
lost contested possession by 8%

But still kicked 100% more goals.

Please explain.


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599553Post WinnersOnly »

They play the perfect game of 'keepings off'. When they win the ball the simply dont give it back to the opposition. Their backline work sublimely for each other to cut off them opposition forward thrusts. Every player does the team thing they are beautifully coached....


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599562Post Bluthy »

It raises the meaning of some stats. What is a Carlton clearance worth with some young kid bumbling the ball out that registers as a clearance against Hodge flicking a clean 15m handball to his team-mate that launches a Hawthorn attack with clean air?

But it also shows the best coaches are constantly evolving depending on their squads strengths and weaknesses. Geelong were doing the same when they didn't have a great midfield. They rearranged to have Bartel launching attacks from the halfback instead. It's why Lyon I think breaks down at the pointy end of the year. He just keeps hammering the same system and doesn't tailor it or vary it according to players or just to change it up to be unpredictable. You have to keep evolving.

And this is just one game. When they want to Hawks can win plenty of contested ball. This might have been a trial of something different to see how their structure copes with the oppo winning it. That's what Clarkson does - he is always experimenting, trying different things.


ripplug66
Club Player
Posts: 1452
Joined: Fri 25 Sep 2015 10:35am

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599565Post ripplug66 »

Bluthy wrote:It raises the meaning of some stats. What is a Carlton clearance worth with some young kid bumbling the ball out that registers as a clearance against Hodge flicking a clean 15m handball to his team-mate that launches a Hawthorn attack with clean air?

But it also shows the best coaches are constantly evolving depending on their squads strengths and weaknesses. Geelong were doing the same when they didn't have a great midfield. They rearranged to have Bartel launching attacks from the halfback instead. It's why Lyon I think breaks down at the pointy end of the year. He just keeps hammering the same system and doesn't tailor it or vary it according to players or just to change it up to be unpredictable. You have to keep evolving.

And this is just one game. When they want to Hawks can win plenty of contested ball. This might have been a trial of something different to see how their structure copes with the oppo winning it. That's what Clarkson does - he is always experimenting, trying different things.

Pretty much a myth about coaches trying different things. He may at this time of year but like every single club they are all very structured. Sides may change it around if they are getting well and truly thrashed like we did against the WB but the hawks don't change much, if anything at all, because they keep winning. His game plan might be different to some other sides but it is very structured and that is why they can win with stats like last night. Every single player knows their roll.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 456 times
Contact:

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599566Post Life Long Saint »

Carlton's disposal efficiency was 68%
The Hawks won the uncontested possession by 45%
And Carlton had 49 clangers compared to the Hawks' 34
They had more inside 50's and kicked 8.5 to 4.8...So Carlton's inaccuracy cost them too.


Trixilver
Club Player
Posts: 338
Joined: Sun 02 May 2010 6:24pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599635Post Trixilver »

Please explain.
They were playing Carlton.


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599864Post Griggsy »

Scores per team possession is my guess (if 1 possession was when they get the ball to when they lose it or score). Not sure if there is actually a stat for that but I think there should be.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Modern Footy

Post: # 1599866Post Con Gorozidis »

Life Long Saint wrote:Carlton's disposal efficiency was 68%
The Hawks won the uncontested possession by 45%
And Carlton had 49 clangers compared to the Hawks' 34
They had more inside 50's and kicked 8.5 to 4.8...So Carlton's inaccuracy cost them too.
Sounds about right.


Post Reply