Is this our best 22.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8520 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763776Post saynta »

Dinny (whoever the f*** that is) thinks it is.

From AFL.com

"B: Jarryn Geary, Nathan Brown, Daniel McKenzie
HB: Dylan Roberton, Jake Carlisle, Jimmy Webster
C: Hunter Clark, Jack Steele, Dan Hannebery
HF: Blake Acres, Tim Membrey, Jack Billings
F: Jade Gresham, Josh Bruce, Jack Lonie
FOLL: Billy Longer, Seb Ross, Jack Steven
I/C: Ben Long, Paddy McCartin, Dean Kent, Shane Savage

The inclusion of Dan Hannebery sees Jack Newnes not in the team, although he'll have high expectations of improving on a disappointing 2018. There's a reasonable chance Josh Battle is picked, but Josh Bruce was selected because he can help out in the ruck. Nick Coffield will be very close as well. Some will want Logan Austin in over Nathan Brown, but the former Magpie has proven reliable in his two seasons at the Saints. Inside midfielders Luke Dunstan and David Armitage will find it tough to win berths as the club is well-stocked in that position, while Jack Sinclair and Rowan Marshall won't be too far away from the 22. - Dinny Navaratnam"


wally
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 101 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763782Post wally »

I guess our hope is that by years end that is not still our best 22, and that our younger brigade are given opportunities and improve.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16564
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3454 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763785Post skeptic »

I think it’s pretty close.

Membrey at CHF doesn’t quite work and Paddy isn’t versatile enough (or at least wasn’t) to come off the bench. Plus where is the second ruck?

I pbly have Marshall in ahead of Paddy and whilst I don’t mind Geary, my hope would be that McKenzie properly takes his role and a guy like Coffield is able to cement his spot in the backline as a damaging running back


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3306
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 501 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763792Post older saint »

My guess:
B: Geary, Carlise, Rice
HB: Webster, Bruce, Robbo
C: Sinclair, Ross,Acres
HF: Billlings, Membrey, Hannebery
F: Lonie, Marshall, Battle
Foll: Longer, Steven, Steele
Int: Clarke, Coffield, Long, McKenzie


Bruce to CHB, McCartin behind Marshall as he can ruck, Savage, Newness actually made to earn games rather than the AR gifts,

Long year ahead


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18534
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1875 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763797Post SaintPav »

older saint wrote: Sat 20 Oct 2018 8:42pm My guess:
B: Geary, Carlise, Rice
HB: Webster, Bruce, Robbo
C: Sinclair, Ross,Acres
HF: Billlings, Membrey, Hannebery
F: Lonie, Marshall, Battle
Foll: Longer, Steven, Steele
Int: Clarke, Coffield, Long, McKenzie


Bruce to CHB, McCartin behind Marshall as he can ruck, Savage, Newness actually made to earn games rather than the AR gifts,

Long year ahead
Gresham not good enough?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763799Post dragit »

I guess it depends a bit on how we see the year, dinny is probably pretty spot on with what the club will be thinking.

If I am picking a team to help us get up the ladder in three years time, the first blokes I would be picking are:

B white
Austin
Clark
Coffield
Marshall
Pick 4
Pick 36

With obvious best 22

Steven
Acres
Gresham
Carlisle
Webster
Ross
Hannebery
Geary
Membrey
Steele
Roberton
Billings

19^

3 from these v players who really need to earn a game

Bruce v mcartin v battle
Pierce v longer
Lonie v long
Sinclair
Newnes
Savage
Mckenzie
Rice
Dunstan v armo
Paton
Clav
Philips
Our 3rd pick


Brown should be backup only if Austin or Carlisle get injured.


footynut
Club Player
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763808Post footynut »

FB Webster ?Bruce/Austin? Rice
HB Coffield Carlisle Roberton
C Clark Steele Steven
HF Kent McCartin Long
FF Gresham Marshall Membery
R Pierce Billings Acres
INT from Hanabery, Sinclair, Battle, Ross
Emg. Lonie, Phillips

* Plus #4 draft pick - (guessing Bailey Smith or Max King. later wont play next year. Would love Walsh)
* New captain - Steven
* Realise it's young - focus on development (something new)
* Let them play / enjoy their footy
* No point playing Brown, Armo, Geary, Newnes every week.
* Could we play McCartin behind the ball to get him in the game (swing him & bruce)
* Pierce, Marshall, Carlisle & potentially Bruce can share the ruck. If you add McCartin in the rotation (not rucking) it makes us extremely flexible / dynamic


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4526
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1293 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763810Post Yorkeys »

If Geary is in our best 22 at back pocket and plays there regularly we can forget finals/significant improvement. We very much need a fast skilful rebounding backpocket (Justin Peckett how I miss you). Scouts go to Tiwi Islands as a start. Geary has shown he is a great tagger and this could be his go with occasional guerrilla attacks in the forward line. The line ups suggested, in my opinion of course, show little imagination. For example D mac should be given an attacking role - wing, on the ball , half forward - defence hobbles a lot of his natural attributes. Steele is excellent but best as a defensive centre? Put him on the ball and certainly not stifle him as a tagger. I think we have a reasonably talented group badly coached and poorly set up. If Lonie regularly gets a game we will sure be in more trouble - ok as an understudy but small and not really a team player: thinks 1%ers refers to motorcycle groups. Regularly playing Newnes, Savage the recently delisted Mav & Sinclair is the football equivalent of denying climate change. I so hope Richo is not allowed to keep playing the same guys in the same roles that brought 4.5 wins - noting Carslise, Brown and Austin have to fill the key defensive positions. Timmy Membrey is not a regular CHF. He is damned talented and can carry it off ok at a pinch but is so more effective elsewhere. I fear Richo thinks of players as being pigeonholed and lacks lateral thinking - or good analytical thinking at all. OK on reconstruction though but by then its too late. And I want to know from the club what was its problem with Brandon White - didn't he show at least as much promise as that Burton guy formally from the Hawks but now with the Crows.


User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763822Post groupie1 »

Yorkeys wrote: Sat 20 Oct 2018 10:38pm If Geary is in our best 22 at back pocket and plays there regularly we can forget finals/significant improvement. We very much need a fast skilful rebounding backpocket (Justin Peckett how I miss you). Scouts go to Tiwi Islands as a start. Geary has shown he is a great tagger and this could be his go with occasional guerrilla attacks in the forward line. The line ups suggested, in my opinion of course, show little imagination. For example D mac should be given an attacking role - wing, on the ball , half forward - defence hobbles a lot of his natural attributes. Steele is excellent but best as a defensive centre? Put him on the ball and certainly not stifle him as a tagger. I think we have a reasonably talented group badly coached and poorly set up. If Lonie regularly gets a game we will sure be in more trouble - ok as an understudy but small and not really a team player: thinks 1%ers refers to motorcycle groups. Regularly playing Newnes, Savage the recently delisted Mav & Sinclair is the football equivalent of denying climate change. I so hope Richo is not allowed to keep playing the same guys in the same roles that brought 4.5 wins - noting Carslise, Brown and Austin have to fill the key defensive positions. Timmy Membrey is not a regular CHF. He is damned talented and can carry it off ok at a pinch but is so more effective elsewhere. I fear Richo thinks of players as being pigeonholed and lacks lateral thinking - or good analytical thinking at all. OK on reconstruction though but by then its too late. And I want to know from the club what was its problem with Brandon White - didn't he show at least as much promise as that Burton guy formally from the Hawks but now with the Crows.
My sincere hope is that Geary doesn't play, and if he does, its as a forward defensive type in the McQualter mode. (With you on Peckett... and that dude just kept getting better the older he got). I also like your thinking on DMac, but who takes Geary's role down back ? Webster? Rice maybe isn't nimble enough?

I also agree with your Membrey argument. I have him as a flanker.

If Paddy and Marshall and Bruce all play (i.e. earn a spot), do we need a specialist ruck ? Marshall rucks 70%, Bruce the other 30% ? Thoughts?
I like the idea of Longer/Pierce actually earning a spot on form, not positional lacking, so if they don't, then we don't have a ruck, we have a Marshall.
Bulldogs, Cats have taken this approach... difference is Marshall does have the height.

I like Battle on a wing, too, if those big 3 forwards earn spots.

I'm hoping for a Gresh Paddy Bruce/Marshall
Long Marshall/Bruce Membrey
forward set-up... with Kent rotating through... all depending on the ruck situation

where Paddy = Kennedy / Marshall/Bruce = Darling / Membrey = LeCras / Long = Rioli / Gresh = Ryan / Marshall/Bruce/Kent = Cripps

(in terms of structure)


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763834Post vacuous space »

People are familiar with Alan Richardson, right? He's going to pick every old bloke available to him until the team is out of finals contention. Then he'll select every old bloke available to him until he's fired at the end of 2020 (if we can't find him another extension). He's not trying to win, he's trying to avoid the kind of embarrassing 10-goal defeats that will get him fired. 17 more honourable losses would be a very pleasing and positive result.

The only AFL game Richo has ever coached without Jack Newnes was that one he filled in for Hinkley. The inclusion of Hannebery likely means nothing for Newnes and means that Steele goes back to coming in off the bench and playing sub-70% game time and maybe even back to spending time forward.

Early prediction of our R1 side:

B: Geary - Brown - McKenzie
HB: Roberton - Carlisle - Savage
C: Newnes - Hannebery - Dunstan
HF: Billings - Membrey - Kent
F: Bruce - McCartin - Gresham
Foll: Longer - Ross - Steven

IC: Acres - Armitage - Lonie - Steele

EMG: Austin - Marshall - Rice - Sinclair

https://www.saintsmembership.com.au/


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18534
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1875 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763837Post SaintPav »

saynta wrote: Sat 20 Oct 2018 5:31pm Dinny (whoever the f*** that is) thinks it is.

From AFL.com

"B: Jarryn Geary, Nathan Brown, Daniel McKenzie
HB: Dylan Roberton, Jake Carlisle, Jimmy Webster
C: Hunter Clark, Jack Steele, Dan Hannebery
HF: Blake Acres, Tim Membrey, Jack Billings
F: Jade Gresham, Josh Bruce, Jack Lonie
FOLL: Billy Longer, Seb Ross, Jack Steven
I/C: Ben Long, Paddy McCartin, Dean Kent, Shane Savage

The inclusion of Dan Hannebery sees Jack Newnes not in the team, although he'll have high expectations of improving on a disappointing 2018. There's a reasonable chance Josh Battle is picked, but Josh Bruce was selected because he can help out in the ruck. Nick Coffield will be very close as well. Some will want Logan Austin in over Nathan Brown, but the former Magpie has proven reliable in his two seasons at the Saints. Inside midfielders Luke Dunstan and David Armitage will find it tough to win berths as the club is well-stocked in that position, while Jack Sinclair and Rowan Marshall won't be too far away from the 22. - Dinny Navaratnam"
5 or 6 players named in that team who shouldn’t be getting a game.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 446 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763839Post saintbob »

vacuous space wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 9:13am People are familiar with Alan Richardson, right? He's going to pick every old bloke available to him until the team is out of finals contention. Then he'll select every old bloke available to him until he's fired at the end of 2020 (if we can't find him another extension). He's not trying to win, he's trying to avoid the kind of embarrassing 10-goal defeats that will get him fired. 17 more honourable losses would be a very pleasing and positive result.

The only AFL game Richo has ever coached without Jack Newnes was that one he filled in for Hinkley. The inclusion of Hannebery likely means nothing for Newnes and means that Steele goes back to coming in off the bench and playing sub-70% game time and maybe even back to spending time forward.

Early prediction of our R1 side:

B: Geary - Brown - McKenzie
HB: Roberton - Carlisle - Savage
C: Newnes - Hannebery - Dunstan
HF: Billings - Membrey - Kent
F: Bruce - McCartin - Gresham
Foll: Longer - Ross - Steven

IC: Acres - Armitage - Lonie - Steele

EMG: Austin - Marshall - Rice - Sinclair

https://www.saintsmembership.com.au/
McKenzie, Savage and Geary over Webster, you've got to be kidding!!!


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3511
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 446 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763840Post saintbob »

FB: Webster Austin Coffield

HB: Ross Carlisle Roberton

C: Billings Steele Steven

HF: Sinclair McCartin Long

FF: Gresham Marshall Membery

R: Pierce Acres Hannebery

INT: Clark, Kent, Battle, Phillips


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763844Post Joffa Burns »

Webster - Bruce - Roberton
Sinclair - Carslile - Billings
Acres - Ross - Hannebery
Gresham - Membrey- Clark
Lonie - McCartin - Long

Marshall - Steele - Steven
Pierce - Kent - Coffield- Geary

EMG: Austin - Savage - McKenzie

I believe we will play-
Brown, Longer, Geary, McKenzie, Rice, Savage, Newnes etc in our starting 18 and it will be more of the same from last season.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7025
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763848Post mad saint guy »

The 22 we would field in 2019 if we had intelligent people running the club

B: Webster, Austin, McKenzie
HB: Coffield, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Acres, Steele, Hannebery
HF: Billings, Marshall, Gresham
F: Long, Bruce, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Ross
Int: Battle, Clark, Sinclair, Smith


However i suspect this is Richo's preferred 22

B: Geary, Brown, Webster
HB: Savage, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Ross, Steele, Newnes
HF: Billings, Bruce, Gresham
F: Long, McCartin, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Hannebery
Int: Armitage, Dunstan, Kent, Acres


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8936
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763849Post spert »

Doesn't matter who is in our "best" 22, they need to play with a whole lot more passion than they did in 2018.


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763850Post vacuous space »

saintbob wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 9:49amMcKenzie, Savage and Geary over Webster, you've got to be kidding!!!
Or, more likely, I went to double check I wasn't forgetting someone, pulled up the senior list, got bored around 23, assumed I'd never forget any decent players over that number and clicked submit.

I am potato.

Also forgot Brown unavailable for round one. Still stand by that Richo would select him if he could and may petition the AFL to allow him to play. Certainly coming straight back in round two.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763874Post Cairnsman »

Is this a make or break year for Brandon White? If he can push his way into the team who does he push out? Maybe Daniel McKenzie, probably both are competing for the same rebounding defender type position.

Hopefully Logan can put some pressure on Brown and get some healthy competition going there, I'm guessing Nathan Brown would probably be first to admit he'd like to see someone push him out of the side this year. or maybe next depending on how much footy he thinks he has left in him How much good football can N Brown play beyond this year?


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4526
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1293 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763876Post Yorkeys »

Probably. My footy smarts naivety had me wondering why Bailey was preferred (nothing against Bailey he is a goer and gives his all). I thought Brandon was a good mark, good kick, read the play well and was brave - like many others (not wishing to put words in your mouths) could never understand Mav getting a game over Brandon. Are players tattooed with positions regardless of relative athletic and technical skills so Brandon was never in contention for whatever Mav's role was? I would bet my diminishing TAB account balance on another club picking up Brandon in a heartbeat. Has he played up or given AR some cheek, I wonder? Tony74 are you back from hols? Portugal?


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3306
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 165 times
Been thanked: 501 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763899Post older saint »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 20 Oct 2018 9:01pm
older saint wrote: Sat 20 Oct 2018 8:42pm My guess:
B: Geary, Carlise, Rice
HB: Webster, Bruce, Robbo
C: Sinclair, Ross,Acres
HF: Billlings, Membrey, Hannebery
F: Lonie, Marshall, Battle
Foll: Longer, Steven, Steele
Int: Clarke, Coffield, Long, McKenzie


Bruce to CHB, McCartin behind Marshall as he can ruck, Savage, Newness actually made to earn games rather than the AR gifts,

Long year ahead
Gresham not good enough?
Oops in Gresham out battle


chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763910Post chico2001 »

Funny how Longer is the concrete 1st ruck now in nearly all of the teams. Letting Hickey go has made it easier for selection purposes because selectors virtually have to play him now...non stop. But his form would have to improve IMO otherwise it would be awfully embarrassing in my book even though some wages would have been saved by moving Hickey on. Still cant work out who the clown was who signed off on his massive salary.


User avatar
Schillaci
Club Player
Posts: 1353
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008 7:00pm
Location: Auckland
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763937Post Schillaci »

mad saint guy wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 11:06am The 22 we would field in 2019 if we had intelligent people running the club

B: Webster, Austin, McKenzie
HB: Coffield, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Acres, Steele, Hannebery
HF: Billings, Marshall, Gresham
F: Long, Bruce, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Ross
Int: Battle, Clark, Sinclair, Smith


However i suspect this is Richo's preferred 22

B: Geary, Brown, Webster
HB: Savage, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Ross, Steele, Newnes
HF: Billings, Bruce, Gresham
F: Long, McCartin, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Hannebery
Int: Armitage, Dunstan, Kent, Acres
Who is Smith?
Any other hack as picking a 22nd is too painful?


saintadamski
Club Player
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri 01 May 2015 1:32pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763941Post saintadamski »

vacuous space wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 9:13am People are familiar with Alan Richardson, right? He's going to pick every old bloke available to him until the team is out of finals contention. Then he'll select every old bloke available to him until he's fired at the end of 2020 (if we can't find him another extension). He's not trying to win, he's trying to avoid the kind of embarrassing 10-goal defeats that will get him fired. 17 more honourable losses would be a very pleasing and positive result.

The only AFL game Richo has ever coached without Jack Newnes was that one he filled in for Hinkley. The inclusion of Hannebery likely means nothing for Newnes and means that Steele goes back to coming in off the bench and playing sub-70% game time and maybe even back to spending time forward.

Early prediction of our R1 side:

B: Geary - Brown - McKenzie
HB: Roberton - Carlisle - Savage
C: Newnes - Hannebery - Dunstan
HF: Billings - Membrey - Kent
F: Bruce - McCartin - Gresham
Foll: Longer - Ross - Steven

IC: Acres - Armitage - Lonie - Steele

EMG: Austin - Marshall - Rice - Sinclair

https://www.saintsmembership.com.au/
Totally agree.

Richo's man crush on Spud Newnes is a deep love, and his delusions in Geary as captain won't change.

It'll be more of the same garbage...and I think it needs to be, in order to keep losing , which will lead to Richo finally getting the sack.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2035
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763953Post freely »

Schillaci wrote: Mon 22 Oct 2018 6:41am
mad saint guy wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 11:06am The 22 we would field in 2019 if we had intelligent people running the club

B: Webster, Austin, McKenzie
HB: Coffield, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Acres, Steele, Hannebery
HF: Billings, Marshall, Gresham
F: Long, Bruce, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Ross
Int: Battle, Clark, Sinclair, Smith


However i suspect this is Richo's preferred 22

B: Geary, Brown, Webster
HB: Savage, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Ross, Steele, Newnes
HF: Billings, Bruce, Gresham
F: Long, McCartin, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Hannebery
Int: Armitage, Dunstan, Kent, Acres
Who is Smith?
Any other hack as picking a 22nd is too painful?
Bailey?


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7025
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Is this our best 22.

Post: # 1763955Post mad saint guy »

freely wrote: Mon 22 Oct 2018 10:02am
Schillaci wrote: Mon 22 Oct 2018 6:41am
mad saint guy wrote: Sun 21 Oct 2018 11:06am The 22 we would field in 2019 if we had intelligent people running the club

B: Webster, Austin, McKenzie
HB: Coffield, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Acres, Steele, Hannebery
HF: Billings, Marshall, Gresham
F: Long, Bruce, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Ross
Int: Battle, Clark, Sinclair, Smith


However i suspect this is Richo's preferred 22

B: Geary, Brown, Webster
HB: Savage, Carlisle, Roberton
C: Ross, Steele, Newnes
HF: Billings, Bruce, Gresham
F: Long, McCartin, Membrey

Foll: Longer, Steven, Hannebery
Int: Armitage, Dunstan, Kent, Acres
Who is Smith?
Any other hack as picking a 22nd is too painful?
Bailey?
Yep. An absolute no-brainer for pick 4 but we'll probably screw it up.


Post Reply