Trade idea

Animal Enclosure · Mon 30 May 2011 5:42pm

Mitchell White?

Didn't Sheedy slash his throat?

If you're talking about Mitch Clark, he's a West Aussie but I would agree that he would be perfect.

I'd also have a serious crack at getting Jamar with Melb imploding.

stinger · Post: # 1083064Post **stinger** » Mon 30 May 2011 5:48pm

,,that's the guy....i even checked his name before posting ..but got distracted....anyway...he's out of contract...

stinger · Post: # 1083066Post **stinger** » Mon 30 May 2011 5:49pm

#1GILL wrote:
stinger wrote: much prefer to hang onto dal and try for mitchell white from the brians...he wants to come home...
Who the hell is Mitchell White?

sorry...mitchell clarke...

noreason41 · Mon 30 May 2011 5:50pm

Does no one remember the 'pact' the boys from the 2000's made?

To take paycuts and what not so they could see it through as a team?

I don't think any of our main players are getting traded any time soon.

gringo · Post: # 1083072Post **gringo** » Mon 30 May 2011 5:57pm

Mitch Clark is not really what I want, we need a guy that can be the next gardi, big body centre square ruckman, that's why Bellchambers looks good. I would love to raid north for Goldstein he is going to be a gun. Other wise steal Brogan from retirement as back up for Big mac, he is an aggressive prick that will play dirty to win. Sydney looked instantly better with Mumford, same with Jolly at the Pies, a big reliable ruck would do us wonders.

St Chris · Post: # 1083082Post **St Chris** » Mon 30 May 2011 6:09pm

Hamish McIntosh????

Kangas have Goldstein, who is class, and younger guys like Cam Pederson and perhaps even Majak Daw to back him up. He has been injured this year, but after he was shopped around in 2009, last season he struggled a bit.

Might take a first rounder, cause the guy is only 26, but he'd be perfect pick-up.

The other one is David Hille.

I can't imagine Hirdy would be too keen to trade a former team mate, but with Bellchambers playing some good footy, and if they see Ryder's future in the centre, then Hille might find himself wanting more opportunity over the next year or 2.

goddardisgod · Mon 30 May 2011 6:28pm

Ild prefer to chuck GWS our 2nd round for a VFL ruckman (Russel Gabriel?), and their 3rd round pick.

Thinline · Post: # 1083173Post **Thinline** » Mon 30 May 2011 9:28pm

Cahill for Pavlich.

Do it.

Solar · Post: # 1083187Post **Solar** » Mon 30 May 2011 9:53pm

#1GILL wrote:
dragit wrote:
meher baba wrote:Can I ask the obvious sane question in an insane world: why on earth would the Bombers want to trade Ryder?
+1 - there's no way they would consider itâ€¦
One of Bellchambers, Ryder and Hille will want to leave at the end of the year. Probably whichever one misses out on finals.

This

savatage · Post: # 1083190Post **savatage** » Mon 30 May 2011 9:56pm

Yeah no chance.

Bernard Shakey · Mon 30 May 2011 10:34pm

For a straight swap, I would take it in a heartbeat.

Teflon · Post: # 1083209Post **Teflon** » Mon 30 May 2011 10:42pm

Ryder is not the sort of ruck we need - up and down, goes missing often.

Rather Bellchambers or Macintosh - but no to Dal.

IF people genuinely feel we are a show in 2012...then why on gods earth would u trade one of our few players who are superb by foot?

Honestly, dumb move.

Offer up Gram/Kosi.

Bernard Shakey · Mon 30 May 2011 10:47pm

Teflon wrote:Ryder is not the sort of ruck we need - up and down, goes missing often.

Rather Bellchambers or Macintosh - but no to Dal.

IF people genuinely feel we are a show in 2012...then why on gods earth would u trade one of our few players who are superb by foot?

Honestly, dumb move.

Offer up Gram/Kosi.

Nobody wants Gram or Kosi, Get real.

AccidentallyTim · Mon 30 May 2011 10:58pm

desertsaint wrote:don't younger saints fans know latin?

+1

Bernard Shakey · Mon 30 May 2011 11:15pm

desertsaint wrote:don't younger saints fans know latin?

We should never trade or delist anyone then.

Teflon · Post: # 1083227Post **Teflon** » Mon 30 May 2011 11:52pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
Teflon wrote:Ryder is not the sort of ruck we need - up and down, goes missing often.

Rather Bellchambers or Macintosh - but no to Dal.

IF people genuinely feel we are a show in 2012...then why on gods earth would u trade one of our few players who are superb by foot?

Honestly, dumb move.

Offer up Gram/Kosi.
Nobody wants Gram or Kosi, Get real.

never say never...........one mans trash...

matrix · Post: # 1083238Post **matrix** » Tue 31 May 2011 12:34am

cant say id want to trade dal

id swap gilbert for bellchambers possibly

defacto · Post: # 1083246Post **defacto** » Tue 31 May 2011 12:49am

terrible idea.

if we pick up ryder we might as well get rid of mcevoy. mcevoy at 21-22 has alot of upside, i think his poor form this year has been part exhaustion.

gringo · Post: # 1083268Post **gringo** » Tue 31 May 2011 1:19am

Gram would have currency still and is a good player with a future at the saints. He was injured last year and his stocks slid after an injury riddled finals series. He still doesn't look 100%. Still think he will get back and prove a few of you wrong. We need pace and at his best he is a gun

dcstkfc · Post: # 1083269Post **dcstkfc** » Tue 31 May 2011 1:21am

matrix wrote:cant say id want to trade dal

id swap gilbert for bellchambers possibly

Gilbert is a B+ to A grade player who has been in all-Australian contention for two years.

Bellchambers is an improved and young but still middling ruckman who can occasionally float forward.

Not for mine.

HSVKing · Post: # 1083271Post **HSVKing** » Tue 31 May 2011 1:31am

Eastern wrote:
westy wrote:Bartel Hasn't signed with Geelong yet either.
But, HAS HE SIGNED WITH GWS?????? !!

Apparently about to sign a 4 year deal with Geelong.

On the 3 rucks at Essendon, let's play the reverse psychology trick we did on Geelong (King/Blake)

Go to Essendon saying how badly we want Ryder, and when they counter offer us with Bellchambers for picks, snap it up and walk away very happy.

plugger66 · Post: # 1083280Post **plugger66** » Tue 31 May 2011 8:29am

defacto wrote:terrible idea.

if we pick up ryder we might as well get rid of mcevoy. mcevoy at 21-22 has alot of upside, i think his poor form this year has been part exhaustion.

Poor Form? He has been in pretty good form around the ground and fair in the ruck. May have even voted in 2 or 3 games in the SS award not that is the be all and end all but gives you an idea he is going ok especially compared to some other experienced guys.

matrix · Post: # 1083283Post **matrix** » Tue 31 May 2011 9:12am

dcstkfc wrote:
matrix wrote:cant say id want to trade dal

id swap gilbert for bellchambers possibly

Gilbert is a B+ to A grade player who has been in all-Australian contention for two years.

Bellchambers is an improved and young but still middling ruckman who can occasionally float forward.

Not for mine.

no he hasnt
not this season
if he continued this season in this form then....he'd be trade bait
he's got less of it and used it worse than gram this year

the guy WAS a B+ player
he has lost his mojo and needs to get it back quickly

no way is gilbert an A grade player
brenden goddard is an A grade player
Nick reiewoldt is an A grade player
sam gilbert is a B grade player

IMO

Solar · Post: # 1083299Post **Solar** » Tue 31 May 2011 10:05am

Bernard Shakey wrote:
desertsaint wrote:don't younger saints fans know latin?
We should never trade or delist anyone then.

yep, luke ball says hi

Sheesh people, if you want quality you have to offer quality. Ryder ha shown he can play ruck very well but is struggling with lack of game time and forced to play in positions that are not his go.

Currently we are developing a new breed of midfield. Dal is playing in the backline and we are not lacking in half back flankers..... just throwing it out there.

Mcintosh is a option also.

Solar · Post: # 1083300Post **Solar** » Tue 31 May 2011 10:09am

defacto wrote:terrible idea.

if we pick up ryder we might as well get rid of mcevoy. mcevoy at 21-22 has alot of upside, i think his poor form this year has been part exhaustion.

With the sub rule you need a full time ruck and a back up ruck that can play elsewhere. We are struggling to find this second ruck. Blke is not the long term answer and kosi/gards are nearly gone. Stanley would be perfect but struggling to make an impact.

Like the idea of pushing for ryder and getting bellchambers, would celebrate that! If we could get something for gram then it would be great as well. I hope gram works hard and gets back as he is a elite player if he works hard enough.

Trade idea

Re: Trade idea