Nat Fyfe

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463022Post Saint wagga »

Read a story on the AFL website this morning that mentioned that Fyfe is out of contract at season's end and would consider a move to Melbourne if the deal was right! With his age, games played and injury profile, i'm wondering if people think he is worth having a masssive crack at given our salary cap space? Could he be the marquee player that leads our next premiership tilt? I think it could be worth considering, given he's a bona fide gun, seems a fairly clean skin bloke and the benefits of having a young high profile player...the saints haven't gone after a big fish since Gehrig, and Fyfe would be massive news!!


jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463023Post jonesy »

With Pav coming to the end in the next couple of years I would be utterly shocked if Fyfe left Freo.

Sounds like the Fyfe camp are fishing for more money from Freo


Bring back the Lockett era
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10371
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463027Post desertsaint »

Bit early. Would be absolutely perfect if we were two years further down the track.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7838
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 564 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463034Post magnifisaint »

he wants 800k. too much and too greedy. 200k over


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
howlinwolf
Club Player
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Sittin' On Top Of the World
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463037Post howlinwolf »

jonesy wrote:With Pav coming to the end in the next couple of years I would be utterly shocked if Fyfe left Freo.

Sounds like the Fyfe camp are fishing for more money from Freo
I agree Jonesy. His manager said the Freo offer was not unreasonable. More or less telling them a bit more and it's a done deal imo.


Robert Harvey's last home game. 24 Aug 2008
StKilda 13.17 def Adelaide 6.11
Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463039Post Saint wagga »

I agree, It will probably be a done deal, but do you reckon the club is considering pitching a massive 5 year deal to try and lure him away? Is he worth it?


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463043Post Cairnsman »

magnifisaint wrote:he wants 800k. too much and too greedy. 200k over
I'd show him a a few highlights of the 2013 GF, that should help bring the amount down a little.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463047Post dragit »

Saint wagga wrote:I agree, It will probably be a done deal, but do you reckon the club is considering pitching a massive 5 year deal to try and lure him away? Is he worth it?
He's worth it… but I reckon GWS would throw something like 1.2mil per season at him…

Freo will pay 7-800


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463065Post plugger66 »

magnifisaint wrote:he wants 800k. too much and too greedy. 200k over

Seems very fair to me in this day and age. Not a hope of getting him but would take him at that price in a heartbeat.


70s sainter
Club Player
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun 09 Oct 2011 6:52pm

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463072Post 70s sainter »

The fact is were gonna have to pay overs for someone sooner or later if were gonna get someone in on free agency .
How else would we get them. .
We ll be down the bottom , so instant premiership chance won't be part of the offer.
What we do have on our side is salary cap room .
Would be interesting to know who the free agents are at the end of 2015.


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463104Post borderbarry »

If he is truly available I would have a go for him. He is part of what we want.
:twisted:


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2174
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463131Post Zed »

You'd think GWS would still have some of their Buddy war-chest available, and I wouldn't mind betting the AFL would love to help them land a big name there to bring the fans in just as they start to rise up the ladder.

Not a hope he would come to us - but geez now that the Swans have opened the floodgates with whats possible in terms of ridiculous deals, you just never know what kind of left field may pop out. Good on him, I hope he maximizes his earning potential.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463132Post gringo »

Yes definitely get the Fyfe.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10708
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 809 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463139Post ace »

WHY WOUD HE?
Why would he come to St Kilda FC?
When Gary Ablett went to Gold Coast he knew he would get to play a few years with them while their first round draft picks were in their prime
AND he got mega contract.

The only things St Kilda can guarantee is a big pay cheque and that he WON'T have to play finals.
That will bring forward his annual leave but also mean an extra month of pre-season.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
spot on
Club Player
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 9:09pm

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463140Post spot on »

I would pay 800000 a year for fyfe, best young player in the comp that we could build our team around. No body else on our list would demand much cash for a few years so we need to pay someone the money. Still think there's other clubs he would choose before the saints thou , but if the price is right...


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463172Post WinnersOnly »

Saint wagga wrote:Read a story on the AFL website this morning that mentioned that Fyfe is out of contract at season's end and would consider a move to Melbourne if the deal was right! With his age, games played and injury profile, i'm wondering if people think he is worth having a masssive crack at given our salary cap space? Could he be the marquee player that leads our next premiership tilt? I think it could be worth considering, given he's a bona fide gun, seems a fairly clean skin bloke and the benefits of having a young high profile player...the saints haven't gone after a big fish since Gehrig, and Fyfe would be massive news!!
There is no way he would leave Perth - his manager is just trying to drive up his contract. Concentrate on finding our own stars Saints !


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463178Post ShanghaiSaint »

wont happen, plus 800k way to much... i would prefer Sloane but that's dreamland as well.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463230Post gringo »

ace wrote:WHY WOUD HE?
Why would he come to St Kilda FC?
When Gary Ablett went to Gold Coast he knew he would get to play a few years with them while their first round draft picks were in their prime
AND he got mega contract.

The only things St Kilda can guarantee is a big pay cheque and that he WON'T have to play finals.
That will bring forward his annual leave but also mean an extra month of pre-season.

I think Pelchen and co have a plan laid out with time frames which is all Carlton and Gold Coast had to lure Ablett and judd. Money and a bit of a vague plan make decisions for you some times.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463342Post Spinner »

How the hell is 800k too much?

It's probably unders to get him away from Freo.


User avatar
SunburySaint
Club Player
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 2:47pm

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463345Post SunburySaint »

ace wrote:WHY WOUD HE?
Why would he come to St Kilda FC?
When Gary Ablett went to Gold Coast he knew he would get to play a few years with them while their first round draft picks were in their prime
AND he got mega contract.

The only things St Kilda can guarantee is a big pay cheque and that he WON'T have to play finals.
That will bring forward his annual leave but also mean an extra month of pre-season.


Agree

Also, Ablett had the advantage of winning 2 flags and a Brownlow already.... he had achieved the highest accolades (still does), which is why it was easier for him to leave (AFL Money aside)

The only reason we would get a FA like that now is if they have already achieved everything and are looking at a top up in super and potentially be part of leading a generation of young guys.

I personally don't think we should target an FA until we are beginning our climb.. 2016-2018 would be round the time to look at it.


Now lives in Geelong...
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5767
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 586 times
Been thanked: 436 times
Contact:

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463348Post samoht »

I have a theory re: the elite players.

Maybe we're better off aiming to build a team of say 25 affordable, skillful B grade players in the right age bracket on say $400,000 per annum - gradually eliminating any C graders/GOPs with questionable skills or pace issues in the process, rather than chasing the demanding, destabilizing A graders who will inevitably squeeze the salary cap and or depart for more money or leave the team in a weaker state.
Last edited by samoht on Wed 21 May 2014 1:25pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463352Post dragit »

samoht wrote:I have a theory re: the elite players.

Maybe we're better off aiming to build a team of say 25 affordable, skillful B grade players in the right age bracket on say $400,000 per annum - gradually eliminating any C graders/GOPs with questionable skills or pace issues in the process, rather than chasing the demanding, destabilizing A graders who will inevitably squeeze the salary cap and or depart for more money and leave the team weaker and in limbo.
You still need the stars to beat the best sides. There's no top 8 sides without at least a handful, but I agree that we certainly should be aiming for a more rounded list than we had last tilt…


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5767
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 586 times
Been thanked: 436 times
Contact:

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463353Post samoht »

dragit wrote:
samoht wrote:I have a theory re: the elite players.

Maybe we're better off aiming to build a team of say 25 affordable, skillful B grade players in the right age bracket on say $400,000 per annum - gradually eliminating any C graders/GOPs with questionable skills or pace issues in the process, rather than chasing the demanding, destabilizing A graders who will inevitably squeeze the salary cap and or depart for more money and leave the team weaker and in limbo.
You still need the stars to beat the best sides. There's no top 8 sides without at least a handful.
I'm not sure about that.
Has there ever been a team of skillful B graders throughout - with no GOPs?

Teams with 6 A graders usually end up with about 6 C graders - due to salary cap issues.
Last edited by samoht on Wed 21 May 2014 1:30pm, edited 1 time in total.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463354Post Old Mate »

He's only 22 and already a proven elite midfielder of the competition. IMO clubs will offer him 1mil + a year over 5 years. Would be a perfect Lenny replacement. Still has another decade of footy in him.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Nat Fyfe

Post: # 1463356Post dragit »

samoht wrote:
dragit wrote:
samoht wrote:I have a theory re: the elite players.

Maybe we're better off aiming to build a team of say 25 affordable, skillful B grade players in the right age bracket on say $400,000 per annum - gradually eliminating any C graders/GOPs with questionable skills or pace issues in the process, rather than chasing the demanding, destabilizing A graders who will inevitably squeeze the salary cap and or depart for more money and leave the team weaker and in limbo.
You still need the stars to beat the best sides. There's no top 8 sides without at least a handful.
I'm not sure about that.
Has there ever been a team of skillful B graders throughout - with no GOPs?
All semantics where you rate players I guess, but do we get rid of Steven and Billings because they are above "skillful b graders"?

A midfield of 8 b-graders against collingwood, hawthorn, fremantle or sydney would get absolutely slaughtered.


Post Reply