Coaches votes: Round 2 v Bombers

[saynta]

10 Jade Gresham (STK)
5 Jimmy Webster (STK)
4 Sebastian Ross (STK)
4 Adam Saad (ESS)
3 Jack Sinclair (STK)
2 Jarryn Geary (STK)
1 Michael Hurley (ESS)
1 Dylan Shiel (ESS)

SO Richo

5 Gresham
4. Ross
3. Webster
2. Geary
1. Hurley

Drug Cheats coach

5. Gresham
4. Saad
3. Sinclair
2. Webster
1. Shiel.

My best guess anyway.

I reckon the coaches votes are the other way round. For instance, Seb got 4 from Woosha and Saad 4 from Richo. Any way to find out?

I think tony74 confirmed that I was right.

Not convinced. Essendon were terrible early, improved, but should really have lost by 5 or so goals. Can't see Worsfold giving votes to more than one bomber, and second best to Saad? I don't think he was happy at all with the performance. Richo also likes half back flankers that have a go. Anyway, doesn't matter.

Don't think Richo would have given Saad 4 votes. Not in a million years.

[stonecold]

I could still beat Simpson!!!!!

Marge or Homer?

Either of them could beat him as well!!!!!!

[stonecold]

Round 2 coaches votes

WEST COAST v GREATER WESTERN SYDNEY
9 Luke Shuey (WCE)
8 Jeremy McGovern (WCE)
4 Tom Hickey (WCE)
3 Brad Sheppard (WCE)
2 Lachie Whitfield (GWS)
2 Mark Hutchings (WCE)
2 Jack Darling (WCE)

....enjoy!!!!!

Haha, still picking and choosing your games I see Joffa, no mention of Hickledik's blinder last week!!!!!

Beat an a nobody, so what!!!!!

I could still beat Simpson!!!!!

Kinda explains the GWS desperate decision to Re-Draft Mummy!!!!!

Don't break your shortest of short straws in the process of trying to justify yourself, Interesting what Dunstan stated about 'team first' players hey!!!!!

I let you work that one out, no, I will answer for you, Hickledik always has been about, me, me, me!!!!!

Ask the playing group if he is missed?????

No, he is not will be the standard answer!!!!!

Anyway, according to your mate Scolly, coaches votes don't count!!!!!

They don't count when it siits you but you just spent an awfully long time justifying their votes.................

Are you arguing with yourself now?

Where did I say that, I quoted you, after all your the one who tried to question them, your very confused, not for the first time!!!!!!

[stonecold]

I thought that Billings, or maybe Steele but especially Bruce should have been in the votes

Take any 1 of them out of our side and we may not have won. That's how important they were to the side

The opposition strategists however may think otherwise and may be reading stoney's posts and watching Cho's votes to work out who to target

Steele maybe, Bruce beaten and Billings still soft at the contest at times!!!!!

More likely the opposition look at Richo's votes than your posts, that we agree on!!!!!

Just a serious question, have you ever played the game?????

Just your opinion's make me think that you haven't, not a piss take, just a serious nonjudgmental question!!!!!

Feel free not to answer!!!!!