Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Fri 15 Jul 2016 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 57 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Remind me again when he was All Australian.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Should have been this year. Many experts agree. He is a true winger.Cordz2 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 8:26pmRemind me again when he was All Australian.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10425
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
ack. swap picks - pick 10-15 sounds a lot fairer. but get him.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30092
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Why would GWS do that? Swans will just call out Green's name and the GWS are forced to use Pick 5 on Green.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
If GWS are going swap down the order they would be much more likely to go fora lower pick.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
That would be difficult...but I can remind you that he was a triple premiership player and a recent Best and Fairest winner.Cordz2 wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 8:26pmRemind me again when he was All Australian.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Fair call for Freo id want as much as i could get as well but we should play hard ball to a degree. If we give away the pick and dont get a pick back i think our first pick is 55 at present. that is a long way away
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Tue 20 Oct 2015 5:52pm
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
I'd be happier to split that pick 5 into 2 picks in the high teens - one goes to Freo and we give them Blake Acres as well.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Agree. As much as I'd love to keep pick 5 I think we need to say goodbye and hope there's something coming back.
I thought the Hawks may have overpaid when they drafted Shaun Burgoyne. I hope Hill is our Silk.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Just do it
If they want Pick 5, which we have, just do it
To play games and offer up Acres is an abject nonsense
You do not offer up players who win games for you when played in position
The reason Acres is played forward is that none of Ross, Steele or Dunstan can play as a front 6 and that fact has been detrimental to both Acres and to St Kilda
If they want Pick 5, which we have, just do it
To play games and offer up Acres is an abject nonsense
You do not offer up players who win games for you when played in position
The reason Acres is played forward is that none of Ross, Steele or Dunstan can play as a front 6 and that fact has been detrimental to both Acres and to St Kilda
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Splitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Split the pick.
Then worry about negotiating with Freo.
Don’t understand why some clubs like to conduct negotiations through the media. Freo have been very heavy handed recently... Twisting GC for pick 2 for Weller and the whole Hogan (releasing a statement he wasn’t wanted anymore) have been very direct tactics.
Then worry about negotiating with Freo.
Don’t understand why some clubs like to conduct negotiations through the media. Freo have been very heavy handed recently... Twisting GC for pick 2 for Weller and the whole Hogan (releasing a statement he wasn’t wanted anymore) have been very direct tactics.
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 155 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
It was that stubbornness with Carlisle and pick 5 that got us a late first rounder which netted Gresham.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
At the time, the media were telling us to just get the deal done and not to be greedy. Then the white powder and WADA banned happened. By the time he finally started playing for us and was taking time to hit his stride, the media started criticising us for “paying overs” on Carlisle.
Thank god we had Gresh as the sweetener.
Bad management is bad management
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6078
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
The article that hasn’t been quoted by Johnny parky Ted flamingo (a classic move by this guy) doesn’t actually quote either club
So whilst it states freo are demanding pick 5 it’s all made up at this stage!
Classic stuff
So whilst it states freo are demanding pick 5 it’s all made up at this stage!
Classic stuff
#1 Ryder fan
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
I'm happy with pick 5. If they threw back their 24 to us also then that is ok. It can be used on Zak Jones.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Give us a spell. Seriously.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 9:25amI'm happy with pick 5. If they threw back their 24 to us also then that is ok. It can be used on Zak Jones.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
5 for Hill AND 24? Free are not stupid. If you want 24 then a player like Acres is in the deal. Not worth pick 24 currently so getting 24 for him is getting a little back on giving 5 for Hill.
We should only do that if we need 24 for Zac Jones.
Otherwise 5 for Hill and a future second or third looks likely as Freo only has junk picks after 24.
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon 02 Sep 2019 1:22pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
We'll have to see how the cookie crumbles there but Freo are being too agressive demanding just 5. Don't blame them but it's a bit too much as an after thought.BackFromUSA wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 9:32amGive us a spell. Seriously.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 9:25amI'm happy with pick 5. If they threw back their 24 to us also then that is ok. It can be used on Zak Jones.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
5 for Hill AND 24? Free are not stupid. If you want 24 then a player like Acres is in the deal. Not worth pick 24 currently so getting 24 for him is getting a little back on giving 5 for Hill.
We should only do that if we need 24 for Zac Jones.
Otherwise 5 for Hill and a future second or third looks likely as Freo only has junk picks after 24.
Something has to come back to Moorabbin besides Hill.
Happy for Acres to go in some deal also. He is average. Not a bad footballer but he will never be an A grade talent at he will float between a B and C level. Simply lacks the footy nous and skills.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
if we flick Acres , we’ll regret it.
if we flick him as steak knives ,
we are idiots.
imo
if we flick him as steak knives ,
we are idiots.
imo
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Thank god you are no where near our negotiating table.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
As another poster said. Standing ground got us Gresham along with Carlisle for pick 5.
- diddley
- Club Player
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2016 12:53am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
Almost. We got Carlisle and Gresham for pick 5 AND pick 24. A first and second round paid. Still a great deal for all parties involved, one of the fairest.Spinner wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 10:10amThank god you are no where near our negotiating table.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
As another poster said. Standing ground got us Gresham along with Carlisle for pick 5.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Dockers want pick 5 for Hill
100%.Spinner wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 10:10amThank god you are no where near our negotiating table.kalsaint wrote: ↑Fri 13 Sep 2019 1:36amSplitting the pick 5 for increased trade dips is great from the Saints but the Dockers will come hard on their insistence for pick 5. We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter. I wouldn't want to see another pick5 Carlisle battle with a rival club that distracts us from the bigger picture. I'm just glad the club is looking at players who could develop the team. Removing Bruce wont be helpful in this regard for forward structure and forward player development. Its time we recognised that we cant develop youth quickly unless the basics of the system are understood and upheld.johnnyrayflamingo wrote: ↑Thu 12 Sep 2019 7:43pm The trade for Hill is red hot going to happen.
I think Pick 5 is ok given we are getting an AA wingman at 26.
Unless we split pick 5 with 11 and 13 with GWS and give 11 to Freo for Hill.
Interesting times.
As another poster said. Standing ground got us Gresham along with Carlisle for pick 5.
Let's split 5 for 11 and 13. Pick 11 should be enough to get it done.
Rubbish. We are in the strongest position. An unhappy player wants to play at our club.We aren't in the strong position here and should just do it and move on with other options thereafter.
Fremantle can't afford to to risk Brad Hill sitting out a year, or going at 50% while he plays out his contract.
They picked him up for a second round pick, paid him fairly moderately, enjoyed his best years, and now will gain handsomely from his services. It's an unbelievable win for them.
If we can split or Pick 5 and offer them something around the 10-12 mark, we should stay incredibly strong on that. Quite frankly, if they don't want that, they can get stuffed - Brad Hill won't make or break this club.
Looking at the top five prospects this year, there's huge talent there, and they can deliver 13+ years of service. Effectively, we are giving up a 250-game player.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.