AL is totally responsible for his own villain status with AFL clubs, and in real life...
Bottom feeder
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
So a 'legal solicitor' and a 'duty solicitor' are respectively 'the local solicitor' (lawyer in US terms) and a person paid off the public purse and on 'stand-by' for cases that occur around the clock?saynta wrote: ↑Sat 18 Dec 2021 3:53pm There is usually legal aid duty solicitors duty solicitors available to assist and advise turkeys like Lovett on a first up appearance.
Courts themselves would never contact a legal firm on behalf on behalf of a defendant to arrange representation. Simply not their role.
Such tasks are a matter for the turkey or his/her family to arrange if one is not eligible for legal aid.
From your Link, maybe a combo of Leech, Gutter Sludge & Scumbag.shanegrambeau wrote: ↑Sun 19 Dec 2021 12:37pm
Which one?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define. ... m%20feeder
How it works where I am…shanegrambeau wrote: ↑Sun 19 Dec 2021 12:32pmSo a 'legal solicitor' and a 'duty solicitor' are respectively 'the local solicitor' (lawyer in US terms) and a person paid off the public purse and on 'stand-by' for cases that occur around the clock?saynta wrote: ↑Sat 18 Dec 2021 3:53pm There is usually legal aid duty solicitors duty solicitors available to assist and advise turkeys like Lovett on a first up appearance.
Courts themselves would never contact a legal firm on behalf on behalf of a defendant to arrange representation. Simply not their role.
Such tasks are a matter for the turkey or his/her family to arrange if one is not eligible for legal aid.
Ross Lyon- the gift that keeps on giving.
Two wasted first rounders in same draft.skeptic wrote: ↑Sun 19 Dec 2021 4:16pm I always thought the first round pick was way overs...
Especially considering they were wanting to move him on
I’ve been reading a bit a realestate as of late... depending on your spot in the market, people are always on the look out for either desperate buyers or desperate sellers. If you find one, essentially you should hold an advantage in the transaction.
In Lovett’s case we were desperate to buy and they were desperate to sell... should have been able to come to a fairly reasonable trade but instead we threw away a first round pick for a talented but highly erratic, inconsistent player with a known bad attitude.
IMO was never worth more then a second rounder
Our attitude to trading at the time appeared to be... if you want it, pay for it
To think we could have gotten Fyfe with that pick
Wasn't that Richo's second year?
Even if we did make that pick, Fyfe was a skinny medium forward from WA. Lyon definitely would have used him as a witches' hat at training until he asked to be traded home.
That really surprises.
Yes, this is the person that James Hird was happy to give a reference about. I hope GWS knows what they are getting into to.saynta wrote: ↑Fri 14 Jan 2022 11:09am What an absolute piece of human excreta.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/sou ... 7dfdce3ea5
An extract only.
"Lovett, 39, was charged with at least 88 offences including assault, recklessly and intentionally causing injury, stalking and breaches of bail.
The court previously heard Lovett had allegedly choked, punched, kicked, spat on and even poured a beer over his 36-year-old victim in a series of attacks between February 2020 and December 2021. "
Yeah I thought that but I’m not sure that it necessarily holds up... with things like abusive/threatening messages, I don’t think that you get charged for each individual message. He’d get a charge of using a carriage service to harass or stalking or whatever. If for example he was subject to a protection order or family violence order and breaches it by sending 50 abusive messages... he gets charged with breaching it... not 50 charges of breaching it.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jan 2022 2:48pm Skeptic, I think you might find the majority of these 88 charges have come from this incident where he was arrested and remanded. The victim would have given a statement for repeated behaviours / offending / phone records or recordings, medical records, each would generate their own charge. Hence 88 & counting I'm guessing.
Even our Magistrates wouldn't continually bail someone like this, regardless of the current climate.
Hmmm… you may have a point.Trev from the Bush wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jan 2022 6:30pm The 88 charges would amount to what is known in Police and legal circles as a hamburger with the lot.
Well, I certainly wouldn't.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Sat 15 Jan 2022 2:48pm Skeptic, I think you might find the majority of these 88 charges have come from this incident where he was arrested and remanded. The victim would have given a statement for repeated behaviours / offending / phone records or recordings, medical records, each would generate their own charge. Hence 88 & counting I'm guessing.
Even our Magistrates wouldn't continually bail someone like this, regardless of the current climate.