Is Our Midfield Hard Enough?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
cps
Club Player
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2005 10:11pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Is Our Midfield Hard Enough?

Post: # 650767Post cps »

Hawthorn beat us 11 - 2 in getting first possession from stoppages last night.

So here's my simple question: excluding Lenny and Ball (and of course The Great Man), are our other mids hard enough at the ball?


cps
Club Player
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2005 10:11pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Post: # 650773Post cps »

Whoops, forgot about Bakes.

Still my question remains.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7607
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 439 times
Been thanked: 205 times

Post: # 650777Post bobmurray »

No...

We have so many weaknesses that we are trying to cover with GOP's...

I think it's a given you can't turn a GOP into a great player even if there were 30 hours in a day and they trained 29 of them...daily...


Saints looking like a bottom 4 team in 2024.
User avatar
Statsman
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome

Post: # 650814Post Statsman »

Definitely not hard enough! This has been our biggest problem all season.

Hayes and Ball are our only true inside midfielders. Dal Santo and Montagna play plenty in the midfield rotation but they are really outside receivers who belong out on a wing. It's great to see Goddard starting to play more through the midfield as he certainly has the ability to win his own football at the contest. We desperately need Armitage to develop into a senior player as he's the type who can win the hard ball (but doesn't do it enough at AFL level just yet). Ideally we'd have Hayes, Ball, Goddard, Armitage and perhaps on other as our tough, hard, contested possession winning midfielders who can then distribute the ball to the outside players in Dal Santo, Montagna and Gram to deliver inside 50.


"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8498
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 599 times

Post: # 650841Post Otiman »

Quick description of the players you might consider ball winners.

Goddard - In career best form, on the verge of breaking into superstardom.
Hayes - Playing injured
Ball - Injured
Dal Santo - Can't break a tag
Montagna - Inconsistent (from good to brilliant)
Armitage - Doesn't get the ball enough
Jones - Can't use the ball well enough
Birss - Playing in the VFL
Mini - Too busy tagging

On another note, I don't think it's our inside mids that are the issue. We can get first possession, but the opposition outside mids will collect the ball from a spoil/tackle because we've got no-one to dish off to. It's a HUGE issue that we seem to be developing a team full of ball winners, but then have no-one to dish off to.


User avatar
Statsman
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome

Post: # 650847Post Statsman »

I think its a little of both. I don't think we have enough pure ball winners so to compensate we are trying to turn our outside receivers into in-and-under on-ballers. For example, I'd class Dal Santo and Montagna as "possession getters" rather than "ball winners". That's okay though, as you need players who can use the ball once we've won possession. The trouble is we rely too much on Ball and Hayes to win first use. If Goddard and Armitage can help out in that area, then we can use Dal Santo and Montagna on the outside where they are more damaging. With Ball out injured we're relying on Dal Santo and Montagna to get in-and-under with Hayes and then, I agree, we have nobody to give it out to. We need depth in that in-and-under category so our outside receives can play their natural game.


"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8498
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 599 times

Post: # 650849Post Otiman »

Statsman wrote:I think its a little of both. I don't think we have enough pure ball winners so to compensate we are trying to turn our outside receivers into in-and-under on-ballers. For example, I'd class Dal Santo and Montagna as "possession getters" rather than "ball winners". That's okay though, as you need players who can use the ball once we've won possession. The trouble is we rely too much on Ball and Hayes to win first use. If Goddard and Armitage can help out in that area, then we can use Dal Santo and Montagna on the outside where they are more damaging. With Ball out injured we're relying on Dal Santo and Montagna to get in-and-under with Hayes and then, I agree, we have nobody to give it out to. We need depth in that in-and-under category so our outside receives can play their natural game.
Spot on.

It's no coincidence that we turned games on their head by putting Gram, and Sam Fisher in the midfield.


User avatar
SaintWodonga
Club Player
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
Location: Wodonga
Contact:

Post: # 650858Post SaintWodonga »

Not only are we not hard enough, we must do alot more to address our lack of speed issue. We were really shown up on Saturday nigth with our lack of not only foot speed, but in our speed in decsion making. We were slow to get the ball flowing. We should be trying a faster game style than chip around.


Tony Lockett kicks 10 goals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v4ZQJHjlvM
Post Reply