Point given as Pies Goal..

[saintsRrising]

They also just showed the goal kicked after Milney turned it over on BTG..

The footage showed the ball hit the flag attached to the post...hence it should have been given asa behind and not a goal!!!!

[saintspremiers]

They also just showed the goal kicked after Milney turned it over on BTG..

The footage showed the ball hit the flag attached to the post...hence it should have been given asa behind and not a goal!!!!

Correct. This was pointed out on the Channel 7 coverage on Friday night....is was blatantly obvious.

Yet another example of how a third video umpire could overule during a match for obvious stuff ups!

[Dan Warna]

us v brisbane we were the benificiary of bad goal umpiring decision, same as us v wCE many years ago when spiders shot bounced on the top of hte goal post!

its the field decisions and interpretation that are confusing

when an opposition player blocks a saint, its a fair shepherd, when a saint blocks a saints an opposition player is a free kick against us.

when a saint player is run through, its in the context of the game, when a saint player runs through an opposition player its a 4 week penalty.

you can see why the saints are baffled

[Mr Magic]

us v brisbane we were the benificiary of bad goal umpiring decision, same as us v wCE many years ago when spiders shot bounced on the top of hte goal post!

its the field decisions and interpretation that are confusing

when an opposition player blocks a saint, its a fair shepherd, when a saint blocks a saints an opposition player is a free kick against us.

when a saint player is run through, its in the context of the game, when a saint player runs through an opposition player its a 4 week penalty.

you can see why the saints are baffled

Careful Dan, you'll have the AFL's Saintsational SPokesperson Plugger66 admonishing you with his sarcastic response shortly!

You know he trolls all the threads on here searching for posts that are the slightest bit critical of anything to do with the AFL so that he can rebuke the poster.

[Dan Warna]

us v brisbane we were the benificiary of bad goal umpiring decision, same as us v wCE many years ago when spiders shot bounced on the top of hte goal post!

its the field decisions and interpretation that are confusing

when an opposition player blocks a saint, its a fair shepherd, when a saint blocks a saints an opposition player is a free kick against us.

when a saint player is run through, its in the context of the game, when a saint player runs through an opposition player its a 4 week penalty.

you can see why the saints are baffled

Careful Dan, you'll have the AFL's Saintsational SPokesperson Plugger66 admonishing you with his sarcastic response shortly!

You know he trolls all the threads on here searching for posts that are the slightest bit critical of anything to do with the AFL so that he can rebuke the poster.

I heard Andrew Demetriou got cancer of A55 hole.

he wished Adrian Anderson a speedy recovery

[JeffDunne]

. . . when a saint blocks a saints an opposition player is a free kick against us.

And a 7 week suspension.

[Banger2Plugger]

We can't tread on any toes here...

Baker did and it cost him 3 weeks!

[Furphy]

I also see in today's Hun that Collingscum had the bald-faced gall to complain about umpiring at half time! They got three goals from "technical" free kicks and one "goal" hit the post! Did we get ONE free kick inside 50?