Blakey Gone

Cairnsman · Post: # 954954Post **Cairnsman** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:23pm

Unfortunately

bigcarl · Post: # 954957Post **bigcarl** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:23pm

what for?

Sam23 · Post: # 954962Post **Sam23** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:25pm

The Fletcher like trip on Redden.

Will get 0-3 weeks.

Who knows.

Bardon Saint · Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:25pm

I hate the rule but it was there (trip)

saintnick12 · Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:26pm

Bardon Saint wrote:I hate the rule but it was there (trip)

Does he have a record. Have seen a few get reprimands for trips

bigcarl · Post: # 954969Post **bigcarl** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:26pm

it looked like accidental contact to me. unlike fletcher, he has a clean record and a good reputation. i'd be surprised if he's in any trouble, but who can tell with the MRP?

Cairnsman · Post: # 954972Post **Cairnsman** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:27pm

Yeah can't hide or argue the fact that it was a deliberate attempt to trip.

Mind you I saw a lot of other unmanly incidents by Lions players in particular the attention towards Roo.

Cairnsman · Post: # 954975Post **Cairnsman** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:28pm

Merrit is a DOG if you need any clues.

SainterK · Post: # 954978Post **SainterK** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:31pm

Cairnsman wrote:Yeah can't hide or argue the fact that it was a deliberate attempt to trip.

Mind you I saw a lot of other unmanly incidents by Lions players in particular the attention towards Roo.

I could given the opportunity...

He seemed (very awkwardly I might add) be trying to anticipate the direction of his man....his arms went one way, and he had his legs ready to go the other.

dcstkfc · Post: # 954988Post **dcstkfc** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:37pm

Anything in the Gilbert sling tackle?

degruch · Post: # 954992Post **degruch** » Sat 10 Jul 2010 11:40pm

dcstkfc wrote:Anything in the Gilbert sling tackle?

No doubt there will be...looked a bit ordinary. Blake reprimand, I hope.

mr six o'clock · Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:37am

Come on !!! he's a st kilda player , straight away that means he'll get 2 weeks but due to clean record he may get reduced to one .

plugger66 · Post: # 955090Post **plugger66** » Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:39am

mr six o'clock wrote:Come on !!! he's a st kilda player , straight away that means he'll get 2 weeks but due to clean record he may get reduced to one .

Sorry I dont understand that thinking.

Milan Faletic · Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:41am

He'll get 9 weeks on the "Guilt by association" rule.

If you break up the word B-l-a-k-e it almost spells B-a-k-e-r so may be he'll get seven due to absence of a consonant.

mr six o'clock · Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:41am

dcstkfc wrote:Anything in the Gilbert sling tackle?

what i loved about that decision was a little while later one of our players was slung in a tackle (i know he wasn't lifted off the ground like gilbo did however he was still slung !!! ) and of course no free kick !

Milan Faletic · Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:44am

Will the boundary umpire who stared at Fevola juggling the ball over the boundary line get cited. In a 14 point game that was pretty important.

mr six o'clock · Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:45am

plugger66 wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:Come on !!! he's a st kilda player , straight away that means he'll get 2 weeks but due to clean record he may get reduced to one .
Sorry I dont understand that thinking.

if you look at the history of the tribunal over the last 5 years , saint players always seem to shafted, perhaps i am delusional , i do support the saints !

SainterK · Post: # 955107Post **SainterK** » Sun 11 Jul 2010 12:58am

mr six o'clock wrote:
dcstkfc wrote:Anything in the Gilbert sling tackle?
what i loved about that decision was a little while later one of our players was slung in a tackle (i know he wasn't lifted off the ground like gilbo did however he was still slung !!! ) and of course no free kick !

Not sure Gilbert lifted him off the ground, it was hard to tell, but I think Black might of already had some of the momentum as he was launching himself out of a contest?

Was it similar to Mumfords on Gablett though...even though there is no 'precendent'

dcstkfc · Post: # 955108Post **dcstkfc** » Sun 11 Jul 2010 1:00am

saintnick12 wrote:
Bardon Saint wrote:I hate the rule but it was there (trip)
Does he have a record. Have seen a few get reprimands for trips

No prior record which is good

Same with Gilbo

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/tribunal.php

Hurricane · Post: # 955174Post **Hurricane** » Sun 11 Jul 2010 7:45am

SainterK wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:
dcstkfc wrote:Anything in the Gilbert sling tackle?
what i loved about that decision was a little while later one of our players was slung in a tackle (i know he wasn't lifted off the ground like gilbo did however he was still slung !!! ) and of course no free kick !
Not sure Gilbert lifted him off the ground, it was hard to tell, but I think Black might of already had some of the momentum as he was launching himself out of a contest?

Was it similar to Mumfords on Gablett though...even though there is no 'precendent'

Honestly when I saw the replay I thaught it was a great tackle, sure he lifted him off the ground a bit but the player was moving pretty quick and Gilbo put him flat on his back not on his side, head or neck.

If Gilbert goes for that tackle the game is seriously stuffed

BANG BANG

Thinline · Post: # 955185Post **Thinline** » Sun 11 Jul 2010 8:36am

Blake won't go. He was changing direction.

Gilbert will get scrutinised though. Surely the MRP won't let us take on the Pies with ALL our most important players.

35...LEGEND · Sun 11 Jul 2010 8:54am

Thinline wrote:Blake won't go. He was changing direction.

Gilbert will get scrutinised though. Surely the MRP won't let us take on the Pies with ALL our most important players.

Just a guess on MRP precedent

Blake.. 1 week

Gilbert ..1 week

Cloke..cleared due to insufficient force to warrant a report/suspension.

wallbanger · Sun 11 Jul 2010 10:16am

Blake might get a week, although his arm and leg both went out in the same direction to tackle, which I think may help him out somewhat, rather than a leg just stuck out in a deliberate tripping motion.

I thought the Gilbert tackle was....well, almost perfect. The outlawing of a spear tackle is because of the danger of head/neck injuries. Black did not land on his head or neck, nor was he in any real danger of doing so. Gilbert cannot possibly get suspended for tackling someone in the manner that he did....

Hang on, my apologies. They are both St Kilda players. Let me reconsider.

Blake 2 weeks, Gilbert 1. That's how stuffed the system is.

You watch, it will happen.

AlpineStars · Sun 11 Jul 2010 10:20am

Unlike Frankilin we don't have 10 people in the media defending us.

35...LEGEND · Sun 11 Jul 2010 10:39am

wallbanger wrote:Blake might get a week, although his arm and leg both went out in the same direction to tackle, which I think may help him out somewhat, rather than a leg just stuck out in a deliberate tripping motion.

I thought the Gilbert tackle was....well, almost perfect. The outlawing of a spear tackle is because of the danger of head/neck injuries. Black did not land on his head or neck, nor was he in any real danger of doing so. Gilbert cannot possibly get suspended for tackling someone in the manner that he did....

Hang on, my apologies. They are both St Kilda players. Let me reconsider.

Blake 2 weeks, Gilbert 1. That's how stuffed the system is.

You watch, it will happen.

I don't wanna watch

Blakey Gone

Blakey Gone

Re: Blakey Gone