Saints Average Supercoach Scores
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Saints Average Supercoach Scores
These provide an interesting look at the performance of the list thus far. Kinda five groups in here, and one guy out in front on his own. Interesting to see some of the changes from last year, especially the drop-offs.
Easily the Stand-Out
123.2: Dal Santo (108.5 last year)
Consistently Good, Sometimes Great
108.1: Goddard (131.5)
105.5: Fisher (94.3)
105.0: McEvoy (63.5)
101.3: Montagna (114.0)
(Though keep in mind that Supercoach points this year over-value hitouts and so ruckmen end up way too high.)
Good But Not Great Years
86.5: Hayes (108.2)
85.7: Riewoldt (107.7)
82.4: Gwilt (78.9)
80.5: Schneider (88.1)
Mostly GOP Mids
78.7: Gilbert (88.8)
78.2: Peake (68.7)
77.3: Steven (62.5)
76.2: Gram (71.3)
75.6: Milne (66.9)
73.5: Jones (81.4)
72.1: Ray (77.2)
71.3: Armitage (69.4)
69.8: Polo (-)
Mostly Defenders
61.5: Koschitzke (55.0)
61.2: Gamble (-)
61.0: Simpkin (-)
59.1: Dempster (58.9)
58.3: Blake (71.0)
56.3: Dawson (54.3)
54.6: Clarke (68.0)
53.3: Lynch (10.0)
52.0: Archer (-)
51.3: Baker (59.7)
Mostly Kids
45.2: McQualter (59.4)
44.6: Siposs (-)
41.7: Smith (-)
31.0: Stanley (47.6)
30.0: Cripps (-)
20.5: Winmar (-)
20.0: Ledger (-)
19.0: Geary (67.4)
14.0: Johnson (-)
Easily the Stand-Out
123.2: Dal Santo (108.5 last year)
Consistently Good, Sometimes Great
108.1: Goddard (131.5)
105.5: Fisher (94.3)
105.0: McEvoy (63.5)
101.3: Montagna (114.0)
(Though keep in mind that Supercoach points this year over-value hitouts and so ruckmen end up way too high.)
Good But Not Great Years
86.5: Hayes (108.2)
85.7: Riewoldt (107.7)
82.4: Gwilt (78.9)
80.5: Schneider (88.1)
Mostly GOP Mids
78.7: Gilbert (88.8)
78.2: Peake (68.7)
77.3: Steven (62.5)
76.2: Gram (71.3)
75.6: Milne (66.9)
73.5: Jones (81.4)
72.1: Ray (77.2)
71.3: Armitage (69.4)
69.8: Polo (-)
Mostly Defenders
61.5: Koschitzke (55.0)
61.2: Gamble (-)
61.0: Simpkin (-)
59.1: Dempster (58.9)
58.3: Blake (71.0)
56.3: Dawson (54.3)
54.6: Clarke (68.0)
53.3: Lynch (10.0)
52.0: Archer (-)
51.3: Baker (59.7)
Mostly Kids
45.2: McQualter (59.4)
44.6: Siposs (-)
41.7: Smith (-)
31.0: Stanley (47.6)
30.0: Cripps (-)
20.5: Winmar (-)
20.0: Ledger (-)
19.0: Geary (67.4)
14.0: Johnson (-)
- stkildathunda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
- Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
- Contact:
Compare those to the other teams though and you'll find averages have dropped across the board.. Changes in way points are rewarded have affected scoring eg forwards like Riewoldt & Brown...
Also your probably best to look at them in two halfs. From Rounds 1-10 & Rounds 11-19 to see what the differences are when we are winning and losing... think you'll be suprised at the differences
Also your probably best to look at them in two halfs. From Rounds 1-10 & Rounds 11-19 to see what the differences are when we are winning and losing... think you'll be suprised at the differences
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
563 posts and I reckon not a single one has gone beyond a line in length.jays wrote:dal in great form
I admire your brevity!
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
fair point.stkildathunda wrote:Also your probably best to look at them in two halfs. From Rounds 1-10 & Rounds 11-19 to see what the differences are when we are winning and losing... think you'll be suprised at the differences
that leaves us with 23 players who played more than one before round 11 and more than one after. this is the percentage difference in average supercoach score:
+72% Gamble (41 - 70)
+48% Koschitzke (50 - 74)
+38% Steven (64 - 89)
+36% Clarke (45 - 60)
+33% McEvoy (90 - 120)
+27% Dal Santo (109 - 139)
+26% Peake (67 - 85)
+21% Milne (69 - 83)
+20% Jones (67 - 81)
+18% Goddard (100 - 118)
+14% Gwilt (78 - 89)
+12% Polo (65 - 72)
+7% Gram (74 - 79)
+6% Ray (70 - 74)
+0% Baker (51 - 51)
-3% Riewoldt (87 - 84)
-6% Fisher (108 - 102)
-7% Schneider (84 - 78)
-7% Dawson (59 - 54)
-8% Gilbert (82 - 75)
-10% Montagna (106 - 96)
-13% Dempster (63 - 55)
-37% Armitage (86 - 54)
interesting list. most have improved. joey and chips can be forgiven for appearing in the bottom half because they kept us afloat in the early part of the year. definitely a disappointing year thus far for riewoldt, schneider and gilbert. dawson and dempster defenders so not much to read into that.
armitage the interesting one. he would have been happy going out in 86, but since then has been pushed out of the midfield (?) and is coming back in 54.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
on the brownlow, you'd think dal will poll 2 or 3 in most of our wins and we have had a few now. will give the field a big head start but if he can get his current form going for the last 5 rounds he is a show, history shows that the umpires have a soft spot for him. plus no hayes to take votes from him.milney044 wrote:Not surprised about Dal. The Brownlow will be interesting this year, you'd think Judd would have it in the bag at this stage but Dal tends to poll pretty well.
judd is very good though, murphy will take votes but they will get plenty between them. if i was betting i'd have those two in the top 5 with dal.