I don't think we paid overs for lee

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6032
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 364 times

I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316903Post MC Gusto »

Pick 12 essentially giving us 3 players was a good bit of business

Pick 13 for hickey however...that might be overs


#1 Ryder fan
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316905Post stinger »

too early to tell on either...but they will need to turn out damn good players all the same.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
paddy
Club Player
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2011 7:06pm

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316928Post paddy »

the media always neglect to mention the other picks we got in exchange....


mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4288
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316934Post mr six o'clock »

Hickey looks OK and he has just turned 22 !
I hope in three years time when he should be playing at his best , where all saying what a great pick up he was !


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316935Post SaintPav »

We also got pick 26 for pick 13 which became pick 25 (I think) which we used on Spencer White and pick 47 which we used on TDL.

There was some really good analysis on this on BF which was highlighted by Kosifantuti.

They could all end up being duds. Who knows.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316938Post Eastern »

mr six o'clock wrote:Hickey looks OK and he has just turned 22 !
I hope in three years time when he should be playing at his best , where all saying what a great pick up he was !
I would think 5-8 years time. At 25 a ruckman worth his salt is starting to get noticed outside his own club (Ben McEvoy beat that theory by 1 year). Between 27-30 Ruckmen of note are in their prime !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4220
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1383 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316939Post cwrcyn »

Hickey is a natural tap ruckman with a good leap. In time, he'll be a very useful player.

Wright will be a really good player.

Lee and White are a flip of the coin.

I've got some hopes for Saunders, as well.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316948Post plugger66 »

As of round 2 we have paid overs for both players but there is at least 2 or 3 years to find out if we really paid overs.


creepypolar
Club Player
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed 19 Oct 2011 5:20pm

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316968Post creepypolar »

cwrcyn wrote:Hickey is a natural tap ruckman with a good leap. In time, he'll be a very useful player.

Wright will be a really good player.

Lee and White are a flip of the coin.

I've got some hopes for Saunders, as well.
You'd hope with Lee and White, that atleast for one of them, we win the coin flip. Nice change


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316978Post Spinner »

Hickey has played more games than Lee thus far...


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316980Post borderbarry »

Saintpav we got TDL during the trade period. We took Saunders with that pick in the draft.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1316990Post Old Mate »

Too early to tell but I've got a better feeling about Hickey than Lee.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317022Post SaintPav »

borderbarry wrote:Saintpav we got TDL during the trade period. We took Saunders with that pick in the draft.
We traded out comp 13 pick for Tom Hickey for draft picks No. 26 and 47 (used on TDL during draft period).

We got pick 43 and 24 and Lee when we traded pick 12 to GWS and we used we used pick 24 on Nathan Wright and pick 43 on Josh Saunders.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317030Post suss »

Old Mate wrote:Too early to tell but I've got a better feeling about Hickey than Lee.
Agree. Hickey will be a gun. Lee - I doubt it.

Wright looks like a 200+ gamer though. Makes up for Lee.


kimberly saint
Club Player
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2011 8:05pm
Location: Australia

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317035Post kimberly saint »

has anyone watched any the VFL games lee has played this year, hows he faired ??????? can he catch it , mobile etc

The VFL should not be much step up from WAFL


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317038Post bergholt »

suss wrote:Agree. Hickey will be a gun. Lee - I doubt it.
I'm not sure how you can be so confident about a 22 year old who's only been on the list for a few months. I agree that he's got a long way to go but it seems silly to be adamant that he won't make it.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317045Post bigcarl »

Both will be good down the track


User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317048Post Verdun66 »

We seem to be going over old ground. We got packages of players for those picks. They weren't singular. At the time I read quite a few of the phantom drafts, and a theme emerged that the top 10 picks were really that, but picks 10-30 you could pretty much throw a blanket over. So instead of 2 players in that bracket we actually got 4 in the top 25. Then some bonuses in the 40's. Wright apparently could have gone anywhere from about 15-18 onwards.

Hickey we badly needed, as exemplified by our dire circumstance when McEvoy was injured last year. Other clubs were after him. Because we badly needed a 2nd ruckman nothing was 'overs'. Other clubs were after Lee apparently. We tried very hard to do the key back deal, but clearly would have had to pay overs, so we didn't. Nearly got done.

We are trying to catch up on years of poor recruiting, and are making a pretty fair effort. Getting 4 picks instead of 2 in the top 25 seems like a good deal to me.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317060Post suss »

bergholt wrote:
suss wrote:Agree. Hickey will be a gun. Lee - I doubt it.
I'm not sure how you can be so confident about a 22 year old who's only been on the list for a few months. I agree that he's got a long way to go but it seems silly to be adamant that he won't make it.
Note the word "doubt", not "know" - that's not adamant. He's had two bites at the cherry. Drafted. Delisted. Drafted. Kicked some goals in the WAFL in between. For mine, that's not sufficient to be exchanged for pick 12 (yes, I acknowledge the later pick exchange).

I desperately hope I am proven wrong, but if he doesn't command a game now with Maister as his primary competition (and note he's 22, consider how good pick 13 Jack Reiwoldt was at the same age), I can't see how he'll ever justify the price tag.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317061Post BigMart »

We haven't seen enough IMO to form an opinion.


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317064Post remboy »

Verdun66 wrote:We seem to be going over old ground. We got packages of players for those picks. They weren't singular. At the time I read quite a few of the phantom drafts, and a theme emerged that the top 10 picks were really that, but picks 10-30 you could pretty much throw a blanket over. So instead of 2 players in that bracket we actually got 4 in the top 25. Then some bonuses in the 40's. Wright apparently could have gone anywhere from about 15-18 onwards.
Agree. Most pre draft guesses were saying similar (it was the same last year). The recruiters felt we weren't missing out on much by dropping 10 places (especially given that our later picks advanced in the order). Time will tell if they were right or not.
One thing to keep in mind is that they are trying to make as many changes to the list as they can in as short a time as possible. With the Lee and Hickey deals (as with the Saad/Milera deal last year) we've got three players for the price of one. They might make it, they might not but I think there's more chance of picking a winner from 9 players than there is from 3.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317073Post Richter »

On the one hand he is already 22 so we really ought to see something that speaks of mature talent from Tom this year. On the other hand only around 30% of picks in the teens make 100 games so people need to bear that in mind when thinking that pick 12 gets you a definite gun. It doesn't.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317075Post Verdun66 »

Also been said that Lee is a late developer. Perhaps more like a 20 year old. Anyway, I hope he comes on and becomes a good player. A long season, so he'll get a chance at some stage. Saad didn't play until later on last season, so might be similar. And if he doesn't develop, and Nathan Wright or Spencer White do, then great. Spread the risk.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317078Post BigMart »

Would people have been upset if we took Nathan Wright at pick 12?

Look at the player... Not the position they were picked

Seb Ross was taken at 25, Newnes at 37....... Right now, reasonably to suggest it should have been the other way around.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7838
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 564 times

Re: I don't think we paid overs for lee

Post: # 1317082Post magnifisaint »

paddy wrote:the media always neglect to mention the other picks we got in exchange....
because the media are ill informed


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Post Reply