No Suspensions
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: No Suspensions
Surprised re Tom. Thought he'd go for sure.
Doesn't make the loss any easier to cop.
Doesn't make the loss any easier to cop.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2269
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 266 times
- Been thanked: 556 times
Re: No Suspensions
Details...
Tom Simpkin, St Kilda, has been charged with a level one bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Sharrod Wellingham, Collingwood, during the fourth quarter of the Round 19 match between St Kilda and Collingwood, played at the MCG on Saturday August 4, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Collingwood Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Contact between St Kilda's Justin Koschitzke and Collingwood's Ben Reid from the second quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The ball is kicked into the St Kilda forward line. Reid is coming back with the flight in an attempt to mark while Koschitzke is leading forward to the ball, ahead of his opponent Nathan Brown. The panel said that Koschitzke had his arm held by opponent and braces for inevitable contact, as he was unable to contest the mark. It was the view of the panel the high contact was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Koschitzke. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda's Stephen Milne and Collingwood's Darren Jolly from the third quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The ball is loose on the ground and player Jolly is heading to the ground to tap the ball forwards. Milne comes to the contest from the side and, as Jolly hits the ball, the St Kilda player attempts to soccer the ball. Milne makes contact to Jolly's leg and chest area. A free kick was paid at the time to Jolly for kicking in danger. It was the view of the panel that Milne was making a genuine attempt to kick the ball. No further action was taken.
Tom Simpkin, St Kilda, has been charged with a level one bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Sharrod Wellingham, Collingwood, during the fourth quarter of the Round 19 match between St Kilda and Collingwood, played at the MCG on Saturday August 4, 2012.
In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea.
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Collingwood Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.
Contact between St Kilda's Justin Koschitzke and Collingwood's Ben Reid from the second quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The ball is kicked into the St Kilda forward line. Reid is coming back with the flight in an attempt to mark while Koschitzke is leading forward to the ball, ahead of his opponent Nathan Brown. The panel said that Koschitzke had his arm held by opponent and braces for inevitable contact, as he was unable to contest the mark. It was the view of the panel the high contact was caused by circumstances outside the control of player Koschitzke. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda's Stephen Milne and Collingwood's Darren Jolly from the third quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The ball is loose on the ground and player Jolly is heading to the ground to tap the ball forwards. Milne comes to the contest from the side and, as Jolly hits the ball, the St Kilda player attempts to soccer the ball. Milne makes contact to Jolly's leg and chest area. A free kick was paid at the time to Jolly for kicking in danger. It was the view of the panel that Milne was making a genuine attempt to kick the ball. No further action was taken.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Re: No Suspensions
Kosi was being held and was pushed......expected him to have no casedragit wrote:Very odd, two high impact head knocks…
They must be feeling sorry for us.
Milne just no case to answer......was pinged for kicking in danger...thats all it was
Simpkin..........found guilty...........reprimamd if accepts
all as they should have been
KOSI should have infact received a free.......................
MRP even support that in their assesment!!
Last edited by chook23 on Mon 06 Aug 2012 5:19pm, edited 1 time in total.
saint4life
Re: No Suspensions
The club threw their season away not anybody else.gringo wrote:They are acting like letting off some players makes up for throwing our season away.
Too many close losses, too far away from the Hawthorn's and Sydneys of the world to seriously contend.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: No Suspensions
Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: No Suspensions
So that would be another free that we missed out on then?Beno88 wrote:The panel said that Koschitzke had his arm held by opponent and braces for inevitable contact, as he was unable to contest the mark.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: No Suspensions
Just maybe it's because the AFL, by letting off these 3, are acknowledging the terrible umpiring against us.plugger66 wrote:Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
Let's face it - it's the least they could do given the way those imbecile maggots treated us on Saturday night.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
Re: No Suspensions
Hooray !!!!!
I reckon simmo was very lucky though !
I reckon simmo was very lucky though !
In red white and black from 73
Re: No Suspensions
saintspremiers wrote:Just maybe it's because the AFL, by letting off these 3, are acknowledging the terrible umpiring against us.plugger66 wrote:Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
Let's face it - it's the least they could do given the way those imbecile maggots treated us on Saturday night.
Of course that is the reason.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: No Suspensions
Only one had a chance to be found guilty and he was. Kosi should of had a free in FACT and a shot from 40 out.plugger66 wrote:Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: No Suspensions
CURLY wrote:Only one had a chance to be found guilty and he was. Kosi should of had a free in FACT and a shot from 40 out.plugger66 wrote:Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
I think you will find a few on here had all 3 out.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: No Suspensions
plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Only one had a chance to be found guilty and he was. Kosi should of had a free in FACT and a shot from 40 out.plugger66 wrote:Funny how the MRP didnt suspend any of our players even though many on here thought maybe all 3 could go. Next time someone is suspended though it will be due to the MRP hating us.
I think you will find a few on here had all 3 out.
Never a chance with Nathan Brown blatantly holding his arm. Odd a AFL umpire missed the free.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5011
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: No Suspensions
How do you think we played on Sat night, did the pressure cause the errors, what syle of footy did we play?joffaboy wrote:The club threw their season away not anybody else.gringo wrote:They are acting like letting off some players makes up for throwing our season away.
Too many close losses, too far away from the Hawthorn's and Sydneys of the world to seriously contend.
How did we throw it away?
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: No Suspensions
Yes, but we see that sort of stuff suspended on a weekly basis.chook23 wrote: all as they should have been
Guaranteed that if any of the recipients had suffered concussion they would have thrown the book at them.
Funny game this suspension assessed via the damage caused…
Wellingham deserved to have his jaw smashed - gutless prick, would have been perfect for him to miss the finals…
Re: No Suspensions
i definitely did, from what i saw on the night.plugger66 wrote:I think you will find a few on here had all 3 out.
the milne one looked like he caught jolly square in the chest or nuts, judging from how long he stayed down. on the replay it was obvious that he didn't actually make that much contact, i'd almost do jolly for staging there.
the kosi one looked very clumsy, but from the other end of the ground obviously it was hard to see reid holding him, and that seems to have been what got him off. without that he'd be due a couple of weeks at least.
the simpkin one probably deserved a suspension and actually got one, but his clean record and early plea scraped him back to a reprimand. i thought wellingham looked pretty woozy but he stayed on the field so that would have been in head's favour. that said, i also thought he was farren ray at the time so that's how reliable i am.
still, lucky to not have at least one of them go - it's always a bit of a raffle when you put yourself in front of the mrp.
Re: No Suspensions
Mr Magic wrote:Any mention of the 2 attempts by Nathan Brown to stomp on Kosi's hand?
Or do the MRP no longer consider 'attempted' as a reportable offence?
They obviously hate us. If anyone does anything against us they always get off.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1544 times
- Been thanked: 1901 times
Re: No Suspensions
chook23 wrote:How pav only a reprimand????
have no idea
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12720
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
Re: No Suspensions
What's your response got to do with my question?plugger66 wrote:Mr Magic wrote:Any mention of the 2 attempts by Nathan Brown to stomp on Kosi's hand?
Or do the MRP no longer consider 'attempted' as a reportable offence?
They obviously hate us. If anyone does anything against us they always get off.
My question was a serious one.
Does 'attempted striking', 'attempted tripping', attempted anything' still exist unde this MROP or do they no longer have validity because 'no force' can be defined by them?.
I can recall when 'attempted' used to be a reportable offence.