Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4220
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1383 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376041Post cwrcyn »

This thread comes up every couple of months. I think it's been done to death and we're all in agreement that it was a massive mistake by a coach who was more concerned with himself and his short-term gains, rather than the mid to long term future of the club.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376046Post plugger66 »

SaintPav wrote:
dragit wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

I think you find the pies offered us Dick but we had plenty of those type at the time.
I'm still hoping we can snag Dick.
We can use pick 3.

We wanted Nafan Brown but Malthouse said that he was not going to tear the fabric of the club by trading players. Liar.

Lyon f***ed up.

In hindsight he did but remember Ball's form was very ordinary that year. He was dropped twice. Well once so he could just train and not play and the second time he was actually dropped to the reserves. The pies obviously had a better fitness program than us and he also wasnt required to spread like RL wanted him to do. Anyway it matters all of zero as we cant change the past even though a couple on here knew these things would happen.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376069Post Dr Spaceman »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Ball for a Goldsack would have been a classic trade for the Benny Hill humourists amongst us but alas it sounds made up.
Not convinced this Goldsack person even exists. Sounds like a character from an Austin Powers movie :wink:


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376078Post satchmo »

kosifantutti wrote:Whatever was offered, we were only given the opportunity to deal with one team because Bail refused to go anywhere else.
This is what screwed us over. No leverage + a little tampering = screwed.
What round did he do the deal?


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12720
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376123Post Mr Magic »

satchmo wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:Whatever was offered, we were only given the opportunity to deal with one team because Bail refused to go anywhere else.
This is what screwed us over. No leverage + a little tampering = screwed.
What round did he do the deal?
Probably around the time (August I think) when somebody (Connors?) leaked to Greg Denham that Collingwood were prepared to pay Ball's asking price of 500k per season as against Saints reported offer of 350k per season.

Surprisingly Ball nominated 500k per season as his asking price when he put himself in that 'magical' draft.

Many (most?) consider Judd a mercenary but at least he ensured WCE got something back for him.
That great upstanding person of impeccable character on the other hand ensured we got zilch for him.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376167Post sunsaint »

Scoop wrote:We asked for one of Goldsack, Dick or N Brown....Collingwood said no, but offered Wellingham and Pick 30....we said no.

We then tried to get everitt from Foots, who said they wanted a pick lower than 22. The filth then offered Wellingham to North for Pick 25 and were going to on trade that and pick 30 for Ball.

Foots held firm and said Pick 25 for Everitt was not on.....and the rest is history....

:?
That's how i remember it, & your post should be made a sticky
My thought at the time, four way trades never/rarely work, and in the end had to accept a "no club" trade


Seeya
*************
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376173Post dragit »

Brad dick for Luke ball, man that would be depressing... Think I'd prefer the nothing that we ended up with.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7040
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376187Post mad saint guy »

Weren't we trying to get Andrejs Everitt with the pick for Ball at that stage? Collingwood were trying to get a slightly better pick from North in exchange for Wellingham because the Bulldogs wouldn't accept the one on offer, and we were stuck waiting on those negotiations which ended up falling through.


User avatar
stevie
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4898
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376298Post stevie »

dragit wrote:Brad dick for Luke ball, man that would be depressing... Think I'd prefer the nothing that we ended up with.
Yep. Luckily the offer for Dick was withdrawn and we pulled out of the deal.


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376312Post satchmo »

Mr Magic wrote:
That great upstanding person of impeccable character on the other hand ensured we got zilch for him.
This is my enduring memory of Luke. What a shame that is.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
tweedaletomanning
Club Player
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008 2:30am

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376329Post tweedaletomanning »

satchmo wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
That great upstanding person of impeccable character on the other hand ensured we got zilch for him.
This is my enduring memory of Luke. What a shame that is.
Have to agree.

IMHO he is the lowest form of a dog a human can be.

He literally cost us the 2010 flag.


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4517
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376339Post whiskers3614 »

tweedaletomanning wrote:
satchmo wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
That great upstanding person of impeccable character on the other hand ensured we got zilch for him.
This is my enduring memory of Luke. What a shame that is.
Have to agree.

IMHO he is the lowest form of a dog a human can be.

He literally cost us the 2010 flag.
Yeah no worries All Ball's fault nothing to do with "master coach" forgetting him on the bench in '09 GF or giving 1st round DP for that piece 0of Essendon excrement!


Watts the Buzz
Club Player
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun 19 Feb 2012 1:26pm

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376356Post Watts the Buzz »

saintspremiers wrote:Whatever happens it was a disgrace to lose ball for nothing.

What other club recently has had a similar disaster?
Stevens walked from Port Adelaide and went to Carlton.......got nothing for him


User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3136
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Land of the Giants
Has thanked: 480 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack not offered for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376416Post MCG-Unit »

This has been written so many times on here..........

I believe Saints asked Coll for DP14 (Lewis Jetta) - looked ok until Coll traded that for Darren Jolly. From then Saints were never going to get a fair deal for Ball - unless Coll were prepared to give up an 'untouchable' similar type player (my guess, say Beams or Sidebottom).

Ross Lyon said after the Trade Period "....''In the end it was 25 and 62 on the table. We were unlikely to use 62 and, in our view, 25 was not going to get Luke Ball (deal) done,'' Lyon said.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/rfnews/sa ... 12835.html

Fact is, Coll never had DP25 - NM did (Aaron Black) so for it to be 'on the table' - there must have been a deal between Coll & NM. Again speculation was that Coll offered DP30 plus a player (maybe Wellingham) to NM for DP25.

/Ball non-trade


Hold your ground :shock:
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376420Post clarky449 »

whiskers3614 wrote:
tweedaletomanning wrote:
satchmo wrote:


This is my enduring memory of Luke. What a shame that is.
Have to agree.

IMHO he is the lowest form of a dog a human can be.

He literally cost us the 2010 flag.
Yeah no worries All Ball's fault nothing to do with "master coach" forgetting him on the bench in '09 GF or giving 1st round DP for that piece 0of Essendon excrement!
Yep Ross is to blame for the terrible misses by our team in 09! Yep makes sense. The players lost 2009. Some of those misses were disgraceful in such a big game.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4517
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 299 times

Re: Tyson Goldsack for Luke Ball

Post: # 1376429Post whiskers3614 »

Try reading the post I was replying to.
Stated that BALL cost us 2010 flag......
I'm suggesting that Lyon's mis use of Ball in 2009 GF led to Ball going, but then your hero had that "jet" Lovett to throw into the midfield so didn't negotiate a deal with Collingwood for Ball. As big a muck-up trading wise as Stewart/Barrot.


Post Reply