It will be interesting to see if Jack Billings plays tomorrow night. Marshall missed the week after he had the same injury.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 7:24pm We’ve got a heap of injuries and three of the emergencies were held back. One will be sub.
Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5813
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: M32
- Has thanked: 816 times
- Been thanked: 765 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8574
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 1526 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Ratten said Marshall would have played if it hadn’t been a five day break. Hopefully 9 days makes a difference.samuraisaint wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 10:34pmIt will be interesting to see if Jack Billings plays tomorrow night. Marshall missed the week after he had the same injury.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Sat 24 Apr 2021 7:24pm We’ve got a heap of injuries and three of the emergencies were held back. One will be sub.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Dunstan is now in that group that are too good for VFL, but not good enough at AFL.
He's been a great soldier over the journey. He's a depth player for us now. He knows it. Will keep working hard like in games like this that were tailor made for his style.
I dont think any of the other listed guys did near enough to be knocking the door down.
He's been a great soldier over the journey. He's a depth player for us now. He knows it. Will keep working hard like in games like this that were tailor made for his style.
I dont think any of the other listed guys did near enough to be knocking the door down.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1383 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Dunstan.....slow, poor disposal. Always been that way. We need to recruit new young midfielders with elite speed and disposal.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1092
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 262 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Does anyone have access to the VFL game stats and can post them, or knows where to find them on the web?
It seems to be an area not done well for those of us interested in emerging players s across the competition.
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Have needed to do so since 2010, they have had 11 drafts and still havent managed to draft an elite midfielder - utter rubbish how many they have got so wrong!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22731
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8640 times
- Been thanked: 3788 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Byrnes and Bytel will be 100 game players. Whether either will ever be elite remains to be seen. Very promising though.Impatient Sainter wrote: ↑Sun 25 Apr 2021 2:55pmHave needed to do so since 2010, they have had 11 drafts and still havent managed to draft an elite midfielder - utter rubbish how many they have got so wrong!
My saints source said Byrnes was the one to watch out for this year, then injury struck.
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
- Location: Level 3
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Name. Disp. G.B. K. M. H. T. HO
Dunstan. 46. 0.1. 23 6. 23. 3. 0
Byrnes. 25. 0.0. 14. 5. 11. 3. 0
Connolly. 19. 0.0. 17. 4. 2. 2. 0
Ryder. 18 1.0. 15 5. 3. 3 32
Kent. 16. 2.1. 9. 4. 7. 5. 0
McKernan. 14. 2.2. 7. 4. 7. 3. 7
Hunter. 13. 2.0. 10. 2. 3. 5. 26
Clavarno. 11. 0.0. 9. 4. 2. 0. 0
Allison. 6. 0.0. 3. 3. 3. 3. 0
There’s a “VFL” app that has match details and player stats for most games .......
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22731
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8640 times
- Been thanked: 3788 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
https://www.saints.com.au/news/920644/r ... 46-touches
BEST
Port Melbourne: Templeton, Signorello, Conway, O’Sullivan, Holmes, Delahunty
Sandringham: Dunstan, Ryder, Byrnes, Connolly, Hunter, McKernan
For those wondering, that was Eli who was BOG.
BEST
Port Melbourne: Templeton, Signorello, Conway, O’Sullivan, Holmes, Delahunty
Sandringham: Dunstan, Ryder, Byrnes, Connolly, Hunter, McKernan
For those wondering, that was Eli who was BOG.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1329 times
- Been thanked: 1338 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
L D has ! senior match in 12 months + (and I think serious injury to recover from), roving to P. Hunter. Jury may be too quick to convict. WCE's Kelly didn't look too flash yesterday. Not that it's an apples/apples comparison, just trying to argue for Luke to get a fair trial.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22731
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8640 times
- Been thanked: 3788 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Will not happen on this forum, unfortunately for Luke and probably the Saints community as a whole.Yorkeys wrote: ↑Sun 25 Apr 2021 4:53pm L D has ! senior match in 12 months + (and I think serious injury to recover from), roving to P. Hunter. Jury may be too quick to convict. WCE's Kelly didn't look too flash yesterday. Not that it's an apples/apples comparison, just trying to argue for Luke to get a fair trial.
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13520
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2012 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Dunstan had a much better game than Hill and many others last week, just some players are untouchable and others whipping boys.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2115
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Never been a huge fan of Dunstan but don't see the point of trading in a foreign legion of midfielders who aren't appreciably better and/or can't get on the park anyway.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1092
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 262 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
thanks for that, great app. Wish it had a few more fields like DE% etc thoughon the outer wrote: ↑Sun 25 Apr 2021 4:23pmName. Disp. G.B. K. M. H. T. HO
Dunstan. 46. 0.1. 23 6. 23. 3. 0
Byrnes. 25. 0.0. 14. 5. 11. 3. 0
Connolly. 19. 0.0. 17. 4. 2. 2. 0
Ryder. 18 1.0. 15 5. 3. 3 32
Kent. 16. 2.1. 9. 4. 7. 5. 0
McKernan. 14. 2.2. 7. 4. 7. 3. 7
Hunter. 13. 2.0. 10. 2. 3. 5. 26
Clavarno. 11. 0.0. 9. 4. 2. 0. 0
Allison. 6. 0.0. 3. 3. 3. 3. 0
There’s a “VFL” app that has match details and player stats for most games .......
- SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 180 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Like Dunstan as a tough insider in the 22. But must be told to handball only. Another one of our poor disposalers. But then again Ratts instructs no system or structures so when Luke gets its a mystery what to do except kicking it long and high to a 1 on 2.
- shrodes
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 747 times
- Been thanked: 396 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
We are already carrying one midfielder like this in Ross. Has been told not to kick and almost always tries to give hands off instead. I don't think we can handle having two players in the side who can't kick.SaintDippa wrote: ↑Mon 26 Apr 2021 1:15pm Like Dunstan as a tough insider in the 22. But must be told to handball only. Another one of our poor disposalers. But then again Ratts instructs no system or structures so when Luke gets its a mystery what to do except kicking it long and high to a 1 on 2.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Dunstan has to play next week or there is no selection integrity.
You have to promote those playing well and his game was dominant.
I’d say Ryder, Byrnes & Dunstan in and Connolly sub.
As long as ‘slips through his fingers’ is not selected.
You have to promote those playing well and his game was dominant.
I’d say Ryder, Byrnes & Dunstan in and Connolly sub.
As long as ‘slips through his fingers’ is not selected.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11480
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2499 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
He’s an inside mid (Dunstan)
Who should be out?? Crouch???
Surely you’re not advocating him playing on a Wing
He’s almost the slowest player on the list, with putrid disposal
How’s that going to cut it on the outside?!
Inside Midfield was good vs port
Equal in clearances and contested ball
It was HBs Wings HF’s we were smashed!!!
Uncontested ball is a huge problem
Both defensive and offensive
Getting picked apart easily while defending and not getting a kick when we have the footy.
Ross, Steele and Crouch were good enough inside
Hill and McKenzie were flogged on the outside
Jonas tore Higgins a new one
Amon gave Hill the mother of all hidings
Houston dominated
Burton beat Billings easily
Then there was the putrid efforts by the KFs
Embarrassed themselves
Who should be out?? Crouch???
Surely you’re not advocating him playing on a Wing
He’s almost the slowest player on the list, with putrid disposal
How’s that going to cut it on the outside?!
Inside Midfield was good vs port
Equal in clearances and contested ball
It was HBs Wings HF’s we were smashed!!!
Uncontested ball is a huge problem
Both defensive and offensive
Getting picked apart easily while defending and not getting a kick when we have the footy.
Ross, Steele and Crouch were good enough inside
Hill and McKenzie were flogged on the outside
Jonas tore Higgins a new one
Amon gave Hill the mother of all hidings
Houston dominated
Burton beat Billings easily
Then there was the putrid efforts by the KFs
Embarrassed themselves
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10934
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3375 times
- Been thanked: 2344 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
Agree with you about the flankers and HF’s.B.M wrote: ↑Mon 26 Apr 2021 5:38pm He’s an inside mid (Dunstan)
Who should be out?? Crouch???
Surely you’re not advocating him playing on a Wing
He’s almost the slowest player on the list, with putrid disposal
How’s that going to cut it on the outside?!
Inside Midfield was good vs port
Equal in clearances and contested ball
It was HBs Wings HF’s we were smashed!!!
Uncontested ball is a huge problem
Both defensive and offensive
Getting picked apart easily while defending and not getting a kick when we have the footy.
Ross, Steele and Crouch were good enough inside
Hill and McKenzie were flogged on the outside
Jonas tore Higgins a new one
Amon gave Hill the mother of all hidings
Houston dominated
Burton beat Billings easily
Then there was the putrid efforts by the KFs
Embarrassed themselves
Membrey did well for the minimal opportunities he had. I think they went to King on far too many occasions and Maxy had a shocker last night. That’s ok though, because when you invest in a number 4 draft pick you have no choice but to play him and give him experience.
Maybe if Dunstan plays, then Ross and Steele can replace some of the others who were poor and their form and confidence is down. Crouch struggled, as did Jones. Lonie isn’t contributing and when he does get it he has been wasteful most of this year.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6264
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 833 times
- Been thanked: 980 times
Re: Sandringham v Port Melbourne
I have been a supporter of Dunny's spot in a best 22 as I always thought he was AFL standard but I was wrong. His game against Richmond was the turning point for me. He was woefully out of his depth and he has had a good enough go at trying to prove himself.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11480
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2499 times