Substance abuse is not a mental health disorder. Although there is comorbidity of disorders, they are distinct.

Well, put it this way: we have a hell of a lot less pretenders saying drug addicts should be "put away" in rehabilitation clinics.

linz wrote:

Riewoldting wrote:Put away where?

Given the question; maybe that's why Ben is flying to LA. And when that fails, he can drop in to a Sydney clinic to clean up. Is there anything out West?

Is there any what out west?

Put away where?

Sorry brat, you're off the Christmas card list

Compulsory in what sense?

Drug use and addiction is often a reflection of society as well as the individual. statistic came out yesterday that 1/4 of the homeless in the US are veterans. Don't always be so quick to jump down peoples throats when it comes to drug addiction/homelessness. P what do homeless war vets and ben co...

n1ck wrote:Ok, if this is the truth, how come it hasnt been on any news websites like reuters, theage.com.au, or anything else?

The Nine Network has a reporter stationed permanently in the United States.

It doesn't mention whether Sam Newman was at all responsible for her cocaine addiction Only if he held a gun to her head. When I say 'responsible', i'd consider doing cocaine on a regular basis around her to be considered unacceptable, but not illegal. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding.... Doing cocaine...

Workshop it

It doesn't mention whether Sam Newman was at all responsible for her cocaine addiction Only if he held a gun to her head. When I say 'responsible', i'd consider doing cocaine on a regular basis around her to be considered unacceptable, but not illegal. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding.... Doing cocaine...

Otiman wrote:It doesn't mention whether Sam Newman was at all responsible for her cocaine addiction

Only if he held a gun to her head.

Can't imagine anything I care about less. Don't really spend my time worrying about junkies, thank you. Why respond then? Don't actually recall it being necessary to have to justify my reasons for posting. How about: because its a free forum and I can post as I see fit too, even though it makes me ...

You're all insane

karnak wrote:the objective is to arrive at our favourite player

How do we determine when we've arrived?

So uh what's the object of the game Armo?

2005 – Round 22 – Beat Brisbane by a club record 139 points, Stephen Milne kicked 11 goals 11 goals STRAIGHT :D Best game I have ever seen :lol: :lol: That was one of the most boring games I have been to. Felt nothing inside after that game....Seriously. I loved it, a massive win and it seemed ...

I really enjoyed 2005 v Footscray as a contest, shame about Harvey's and Riewoldt's injuries And also 2005 v Melbourne as a good old fashioned shellacking :) Beating West Coast and Carlton by 101 and 108 points in subsequent weeks in 2004 wasn't too shabby ... not really our greatest performances th...

Oh When the Saints wrote:1997 - Preliminary Final - beat North Melbourne by a big margin, Heatley kicked 7 or 8

1998 - Round 6 - beat the Eagles at Subiaco by 2 points after being 4 goals down at three-quarter time; one of Harvey's best games

OWTS you bastard

1997 prelim, 1998 vs West Coast at Subi

You want a PM?

Oh When the Saints wrote:Ha ha ... big question from Riewoldting.

I've seen him tear such articles to shreds in a grammatical sense. It's something to behold.

That's different, that was a troll, not a good young St Kilda lad

Do you genuinely want comments SaintBot?

So what's the object of the game again Armo?

Ya still haven't explained how the game is won Armo

Well it's a very bogan look at any age, but at least the under-30s have the folly of youth on their side.

Wear such garments over the age of 30 and you look like you should be on Today Tonight pleading the case for your 16-year-old daughter to take regular smokos in order to pass Year 10.